The set of polynomials over a field, $\Bbb F[x]$, has many properties of a field, but doesn't have multiplicative inverses. If we define a set $\Bbb W$ which has elements of $\Bbb F[x]\,mod\,h(x)$ where $h(x)$ is an irreducible non constant polynomial in $\Bbb F[x]$ (can't be split into non constant factors), then we can show this is a field. For example, $(x+1)(x^2+1)+3\ mod\ (x^2+1) = x+4$
All the addition axioms are obvious and simple to check with the addition identity being the $0$ polynomial and the inverse of $f(x)$ given by $-f(x)$.
We use the division algorithm for polynomials which states that $\forall f(x),\ g(x) \in \Bbb F[x], \exists\ a(x),\ b(x) \in \Bbb F[x]$ such that $f(x)=a(x)g(x)+b(x)$ and $deg(b(x)) < deg(g(x))$ where $g(x) \neq 0$. Using this with $g(x) = h(x)$ we see that multiplication is closed as in $\Bbb W$, $f(x)$ would be $b(x)$. Multiplication is clearly commutative, associative and has identity $1$.
Using the division algorithm it is possible to show that $\forall f(x),\ g(x) \in \Bbb F[x] \backslash \{0\},\ \exists\ a(x),\ b(x) \in \Bbb F[x]$ such that $a(x)f(x) + b(x)g(x) = gcd(f(x), g(x))$. We can use this to show the existence of a multiplicative inverse.
Take $f(x) \in \Bbb W$ and assume $f(x)=c$ is a constant function. Then it's inverse is given simply by $\frac 1c$. For the non trivial case assume $f(x) \neq constant$. As $f(x) \in \Bbb W$ we know that h(x) doesn't divide $f(x)$, and as $h(x)$ is irreducible it can't divide $f(x)$. This means that $gcd(f(x), h(x)) = 1$, and we use the result above to get $a(x),\ b(x)$ such that $$a(x)f(x)+b(x)h(x)=1\\a(x)f(x)=1-b(x)h(x)\\a(x)f(x)=1$$ as $b(x)h(x)=0$ in $\Bbb W$. This means that $a(x)$ is a multiplicative inverse of $f(x)$.
The distributive laws also hold and are simple to check, and so $\Bbb W$ is a field. We could find some trivial vector spaces such as $\Bbb W^n$ or if you wanted something more interesting then maybe the set $\Bbb W[y]$ which is the set of polynomials with coefficients in $\Bbb W$, or the set of matrices with elements in $\Bbb W$. When checking the vector space axioms you don't use any specific properties of the field, you only need the axioms of a vector space, and so any vector space you can think of will work under any field.