2
$\begingroup$

If $f_1, f_2, \dots$ are Riemann integrable and $\sum_n \int |f_n| < \infty$ is $f=\sum_n f_n$ Riemann Integrable?

I believe the answer is no, because isn't this sort of scenario the motivation for introducing the Lebesgue integral. I am having trouble synthesizing a counter-example.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If you consider $f_n(x)=x$ for all $n$, then $\sum \int_{-a}^a f_n = 0$ but $f$ doesn't exist. $\endgroup$ – Dog_69 Feb 28 '18 at 16:33
  • $\begingroup$ @Josué Tonelli-Cueto Ok, thanks, I see where I made an error. I delete my answer $\endgroup$ – Kelenner Feb 28 '18 at 16:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Kelenner Your answer is easily corrected... $\endgroup$ – man and laptop Feb 28 '18 at 16:45
5
$\begingroup$

Let $[a,b]\subseteq\mathbb{R}$ be a an interval and let $\{r_1,r_2,r_3,...\}$ be an enumeration of the rational numbers in the set $\mathbb{Q}\cap[a,b]$. Define $$f_n(x):=\chi_n(x)= \begin{cases} 1 & x=r_n \\ 0 & \text{else} \end{cases} $$ Clearly for each $n$ we have $f_n$ is Riemann integrable with Riemann integral $\int_a^bf_n(x)\,dx=0$. Morevoer $$\sum_n\int_a^b|f_n(x)|dx=\sum_n\int_a^bf_n(x)dx=\sum_n 0=0<+\infty$$ But $f(x):=\sum_nf_n(x)$ (pointwise) is the following function $$f(x):=\sum_n\chi_n(x)= \begin{cases} 1 & x\in\mathbb{Q}\cap[a,b]\\ 0 & \text{else} \end{cases}$$ which is not Riemann integrable.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.