0
$\begingroup$

How many ways can $8$ people be seated on two indistinguishable tables that sit $4$ people each provided that persons $P$ and $Q$ are not seated at the same table?

My current thinking is that I first choose $3$ people to sit at one of the tables and then force $P$ to sit at that table. Then the remaining $4$ people (including $Q$) sit at the other table. Since the tables are indistinguishable, I need to divide my answer by $2$

$$\frac{{6\choose3}\times 3!\times 3!}{2!}=360$$

But I think this answer may be wrong, since the total number of ways of sitting $4$ people at each table with no restrictions is

$$\frac{{8\choose4}\times 3!\times 3!}{2!}=1260$$

But I intuitively feel that this should be double the previous result...

Can anyone see where my logic is not correct?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do we care about where people sit at a table? Is a table with $PABC$ clockwise different from a table with $PACB$? How about symmetry, is a table with $PABC$ clockwise different from one with $PCBA$ clockwise? Once we have a clear question there will be an answer. Your second is clearly wrong as it counts cases where $P$ and $Q$ are at the same table. $\endgroup$ – Ross Millikan Feb 27 '18 at 4:50
  • $\begingroup$ Just call one table $P$ and the other one $Q$, then sit the remaining $6$ people at the two tables. $\endgroup$ – dxiv Feb 27 '18 at 4:50
  • $\begingroup$ @RossMillikan Yes I care about those. This is why those $3!$ are in the answer. $\endgroup$ – Hugh Entwistle Feb 27 '18 at 4:52
  • $\begingroup$ @dxiv If I do that, I still get the same answer $\endgroup$ – Hugh Entwistle Feb 27 '18 at 4:54
  • $\begingroup$ 1260 minus the number of ways that they sit together? This gives $1260-540$ $\endgroup$ – WaveX Feb 27 '18 at 4:57
0
$\begingroup$

Your first answer is almost correct. Seating of $P$ and $Q$ leaves three distinguishable seats at each table. Once you seat them, you have $6 \choose 3$ ways to choose the people at $P$'s table and $3!$ ways to order them, then $3!$ ways to order the ones at $Q$'s table. There is no reason to divide by $2!$ because you can't swap the tables after you seat $P$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.