1
$\begingroup$

Problem:

Let (A) $x_1,x_2,...,x_k$ be linearly independent vectors in a vector space $V$. Prove that the vectors (B) $x_2, x_3,...,x_k$ are also linearly independent.

My thoughts:

Okay. To start off I know that since (A) is linearly independent, then $c_1x_1 + c_2x_2,+...,+c_kx_k = 0$ implies that $c_1 , c_2, ... c_k = 0$. Since only one of the vectors is omitted from (B) then since the vectors are still not linear combinations of each other then their coefficients still must be $0$ so that they can equal zero thus B is linearly independent.

Are my thoughts on the correct path to solving this?

Edit:

Given (B), we have $c_2x_2 + c_3x_3 +\dots +c_kx_k = 0 $ which has an equivalent equation of $c_2x_2 + c_3x_3 +\dots +c_kx_k + 0x_{k+1} = 0 $

Since this is a zero linear combination of a linearly independent collection, all the coefficients must be zero. Is this any better?

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Surely you mean they are linearly INdependent in (B)? $\endgroup$ – Alfred Yerger Feb 26 '18 at 5:16
  • $\begingroup$ "are also linearly dependent"... ?! $\endgroup$ – Mark Twain Feb 26 '18 at 5:17
  • $\begingroup$ Something something matroid theory $\endgroup$ – MCT Feb 26 '18 at 5:17
  • $\begingroup$ Yes typo sorry. $\endgroup$ – Adagio Feb 26 '18 at 5:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "then $c_1x_1$, $c_2x_2$, $\ldots$, $c_k x_k$ implies that $c_1$, $c_2$, $\ldots$, $c_k=0$" does not make sense. Fix the beginning. $\endgroup$ – Mark Twain Feb 26 '18 at 5:19
1
$\begingroup$

Suppose $c_2x_2+\ldots+c_nx_n=0$, where not every $c_i$ is zero. Now extend this sum to $c_1x_1+c_2x_2+\ldots+c_nx_n$, where $c_1=0$.

I think that's the idea of your proof. Note: this is proving the contraposition.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.