It is well-known that there are some manifolds which are not oriented (at least for the one I know is Mobius).

Moreover, we have a criterion which asserts that: any nonvanishing m-form $w$ on $M$ determines a unique orientation of $M$ for which $w$ is positively oriented at each point. (M is smooth m-dimensional manifold).

From that, if we define the form as follows :$w=1 dx_{1}\wedge dx_{2}\ldots\wedge dx_{m} $ for m-dimensional manifold smooth M, then the manifold will be oriented. (cause the form is not vanish).

So, please could you let me know that what is wrong here?.

I think that I have some problems with differential forms, I am still not able to distinguish the differences between the differential forms (the same for vector fields) of those-different manifolds. Because in locally, when we are dealing with computations, it is look like the same (formulations).


Your definition of $\omega$ only makes sense locally. So when you write $dx_1 \wedge ... \wedge dx_m$ you are working in local coordinates on your manifold. However, usually your manifold won't have a single chart that covers all of it. Now it is not clear (and not always true..), that you can "glue" those differential forms you've got locally together to form a global differential form.

  • $\begingroup$ Please fix the $d_1\wedge\dots\wedge d_m$. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Feb 25 '18 at 16:59
  • $\begingroup$ Exactly. Your $dx^i$ are constructed from $\partial/\partial x^i$. But not always the set $\{\partial_i\}$ is a basis for all $T_pM$. When that happens, we say M is a parallelizable. Since Parallelizable $\Longrightarrow$ Orientable, you get a volume 1-form. But just because you are imposing a stronger condition. $\endgroup$ – Dog_69 Feb 25 '18 at 19:02

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.