4
$\begingroup$

I am not sure about the answer to this question. For a Brownian motion $B_t$ and a process $M$ defined by $M_t=B_{t-s}$ if $t>s$ and 0 else, what is the Quadratic Covariation $[B,M]_t$ ?

I find $(t-s)$ if $t>s$ and $0$ else, but the right answer shall be 0 and I can't figure out where I missed something.

Best regards

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Well, we'd like to show that the following limit

$$\lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{k=0}^{\lfloor 2^n t \rfloor}(M_{(k+1)2^{-n}}-M_{k2^{-n}})(B_{(k+1)2^{-n}}-B_{k2^{-n}})$$ exists a.s., since this would then equal $[B, M]_t$. Rewrite the limit as $$ \lim_{n\to\infty} \sum_{k=\lceil 2^ns\rceil}^{\lfloor 2^n t \rfloor}(B_{(k+1)2^{-n}-s}-B_{k2^{-n}-s})(B_{(k+1)2^{-n}}-B_{k2^{-n}})\\ $$

and see that it's the limit of random variables $X_n$, with $\mathbb{E}(X_n) = 0$ and $\text{Var}(X_n)\to 0$. (Then show convergence in the usual way, with the first Borel-Cantelli lemma.)

When I first tried this question, I didn't do this - I tried to show that $MB$ was a continuous local martingale. The trouble with this - as far as I can see - is that you have to find a filtration with respect to which both $M$ and $B$ are semimartingales. $M$ doesn't seem to be a semimartingale w.r.t. the natural filtration of $B$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.