Why are complex numbers presented in a 2d panel (graph)? In a normal $2D$ graph the $y$-axis represent the height, $x$-axis the weight. When we want to refer to a certain point on the graph we say $(x, y)$. With complex numbers the case is different, have a look at this graph:
https://i.stack.imgur.com/EVWAF.png
We have now imaginary axis and real axis and that make sense. I however don't understand why points are written like $(1+2i)$? Adding these two points together means that we are converting this $2D$ graph into a $1D$. Why not write them like $(1, 2i)$ instead?
 A: What is happen there is an identifiction. To see the complex numbers as points in a plane you identify $\mathbb{C}$ with $\mathbb{R}^2$ by $x+iy \mapsto (x,y)$.
A: $(a,b)$ and $a+ib$ are strictly equivalent. They express that the complex numbers have two components (the real and imaginary parts). Due to the presence of the $i$ factor, you can always retrieve them from a sum.
The notation $a+ib$, together with the $i^2=-1$ convention is very handy as it allows to use the standard computation rules:
$$(a,b)+(c,d)=(a+c,b+d)\equiv(a+ib)+(c+id)=(a+c)+i(b+d)$$
$$(a,b)\cdot(c,d)=(ac-bd,ad+bc)\equiv(a+ib)\cdot(c+id)=ac+iad+ibc+i^2bd\\
=(ac-bd)+i(ad+bc)$$
You can also consider that you are working with 2D vectors,
$$(a,b)=a\cdot(1,0)+b\cdot(0,1)=a\cdot\mathbb1+b\cdot\mathbb i$$ with
$$\mathbb 1\equiv (1,0),\\\mathbb i\equiv(0,1),$$
and a special product operation such that
$$
\begin{array}{c|cc}\times&\mathbb 1&\mathbb i\\\hline\mathbb 1&\mathbb 1&\mathbb i\\\mathbb i&\mathbb i&-\mathbb 1\end{array}\equiv
\begin{array}{c|cc}\times&(1,0)&(0,1)\\\hline(1,0)&(1,0)&(0,1)\\(0,1)&(0,1)&(-1,0)\end{array}.
$$
This notation is made possible by the fact that $\mathbb C+,\times$ forms a field.
