A projectile launched from $O(0,0)$ at velocity $v$ and launch angle $\theta$, passes through $P(k,h)$. The velocity of the projectile at $P$ is $w$. The slope of $OP$ is $\alpha$, i.e. $\tan\alpha=\frac hk$, and the length of $OP$ is $R$.

$\hspace{4cm}$enter image description here

Let $v^*$ be the minimum launch velocity for the projectile to reach $P$, and $w^* $ the corresponding minimum terminal velocity at $P$. In the course of working out $v^*$, I noticed this neat relationship: $$\color{red}{\boxed{v^*w^*=gk}}\tag{1}$$

which can be proven easily using calculus. The relationship is interesting because of its symmetry and also its independence from $\theta$ and $h$. It also helps simplify the solution of projectile problems relating to minimum velocities, e.g. this question here.

Question 1: Is it possible to derive this relationship given by $(1)$ directly without using calculus but by exploiting some geometric or kinematic symmetry?

Separately, we know that, for a projectile for a given range $R$ (on the same level), the minimum launch velocity is given by $v^*=\sqrt{gR}$. Assume that, for another given range $r$, the minimum launch velocity is $w^*=\sqrt{gr}$. Substituting in $(1)$ gives $k=\sqrt{Rr}$, i.e. $k$ is the geometric mean of $R$ and $r$.

Question 2: Can the relationship given by $(1)$ be derived using the relationships between minimum launch velocity and range shown above, perhaps through a geometric transform of some sort?

  • $\begingroup$ My solution below has been updated to show a derivation of the minimum velocity relationship ${v^*}^2+{w^*}^2=2gR$ without using calculus. $\endgroup$ – Hypergeometricx Mar 21 '18 at 17:26
  • $\begingroup$ See latest solution using vector methods. Much neater. $\endgroup$ – Hypergeometricx Mar 27 '18 at 10:19

Because $w_x=v_x$ and $v_y^2=w_y^2-2gh$, the minimum speed in the origin implies you arrive with the minimum possible speed to point $(k,h)$.

I think the following picture shows a symmetry which could be useful. The minimum possible speed to reach $(k,h)$ is attained when you throw the projectile in the direction bisecting the angle between the $OP$ line and vertical axis. Because this trajectory reaches $P$ with the minimum possible speed, it also solves the "reverse" problem (by reversing the velocity direction), that is, from $P$ to reach $O$ with minimum speed. Therefore, $\vec{w}$ also bisects the angle that $OP$ makes with $\hat{y}$ at $P$, and therefore $\vec{v}\perp\vec{w}$.


By the way, proving that the maximum range in a slope (or minimum speed to a fixed range) is attained in the bisecting direction is a classical and nice problem, and it can be done without using calculus as well (here, for example).

Following with the reasoning, we then have $$ \begin{align}|\vec{v}\times\vec{w}|^2&=v^2w^2\qquad;\vec{v}\perp\vec{w}\\ &=(v_x w_y-w_x v_y)^2\\ &=v_x^2(v_y-w_y)^2\qquad;|v_x|=|w_x|\\ &=v_x^2(g t_f)^2\qquad;\text{where $t_f$ is time of flight}\\ &=(v_xt_f)^2g^2=k^2g^2~~.\\ \end{align} $$

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Very elegant solution! (+1). Thanks. Solution accepted! $\endgroup$ – Hypergeometricx Feb 23 '18 at 15:10
  • $\begingroup$ Would you know if $vw=gk$ is a standard result that is well-known? $\endgroup$ – Hypergeometricx Feb 23 '18 at 15:11
  • $\begingroup$ I personally didn't know it. $\endgroup$ – Enredanrestos Feb 24 '18 at 8:11
  • $\begingroup$ OK thanks. Neither did I, until I worked it out whilst looking for a simple approach to solve the problem here. $\endgroup$ – Hypergeometricx Feb 24 '18 at 15:48

Consider projectile with parameters as shown in diagram below.

$\hspace{4cm}$enter image description here

Let $T$ be the total time taken for the journey of the projectile, and $\beta$ be the angle between the initial and terminal velocities.

enter image description here

Refer to diagrams above. As the projectile is a motion under constant acceleration, it can be modelled as either

(a) First Scenario:-

  • $(1)$ motion at constant velocity $\mathbf v$ from $O$ to $A$ for the first half of $T$ (distance travelled: $\frac {vT}2$),and
  • $(2)$ motion at constant velocity $\mathbf w$ from $A$ to $P$ for the second half of $T$ (distance travelled: $\frac {wT}2$).


(b) Second Scenario**:- as a composite motion of the following:

  • $(1)$ motion at constant velocity $\mathbf v$ from $O$ to $B$ for time $T$ (distance travelled: $vT$) and
  • $(2)$ vertical free fall under gravity from $B$ to $P$ for time $T$ (distance travelled: $\frac 12gT^2$).

(NB - velocity here refers to a vector quantity, i.e. both speed and direction.)

Consider the diagram on the right, which is the left diagram scaled by $\frac 2T$.

$$\begin{align} \triangle O'B'P'= \tfrac 12 \cdot 2v\cdot w\cdot \sin\beta &=\tfrac 12\cdot gT\cdot \tfrac {2R}T\cos\alpha \\ vw\sin\beta&=gR\cos\alpha\\ vw\sin\beta&=gk\\ \color{red}{v^*w^*}&\color{red}{=gk} \end{align}$$

As $g,k, $ are fixed, $v,w$ will be at a minimum when $\sin\beta$ is at a maximum, i.e. $\sin\beta=1 (\beta=\tfrac\pi2)$, hence $v^*, w^* $ are mutually perpendicular. Note that $w^2=v^2-2gh$ per energy conservation, and as $h$ is fixed, minimum $w^*$ corresponds to minimum $v^*$.

EARLIER SOLUTION (posted 21 March 2018)

For minimum velocity (i.e. minimum kinetic energy), $$\begin{align} {v^*}^2+{w^*}^2&=2gR\qquad\qquad\;\tag{1}\end{align}$$ where $^*$ indicates quantities corresponding to the minimum velocity case.
See Footnote for additional details.

Also, from conservation of energy ($V^2=U^2+2AS$), we have, for the general case, $$\begin{align} v^2-w^2&=2gh\color{lightgrey}{=2gR\sin\alpha}\tag{2}\end{align}$$

$\tfrac 12 \big((1)\pm (2)\big)$ : $${v^*}^2=g(R+h)\color{lightgrey}{=gR(1+\sin\alpha)}\\ {w^*}^2=g(R-h)\color{lightgrey}{=gR(1-\sin\alpha)}$$ and it follows that $$\begin{align} {v^*}^2{w^*}^2&=g^2(R^2-h^2)\color{lightgrey}{=g^2R^2(1-\sin^2\alpha)}\ \\&=g^2k^2\qquad\;\;\color{lightgrey}{=g^2R^2\cos^2\alpha}\\ \color{red}{v^*w^*}&\color{red}{=gk\;\blacksquare}\;\;\ \qquad\color{lightgrey}{=gR\cos\alpha}\end{align}$$

$\hspace{5cm}$enter image description here


Using the cosine rule twice,we have

$$\begin{align} R^2 &=\left(\tfrac {vT}2\right)^2+\left(\tfrac {wT}2\right)^2-2\left(\tfrac {vT}2\right)\left(\tfrac {wT}2\right)\cos\beta\qquad \tag{3}\\ \left(\tfrac 12 gT^2\right)^2 &=\left(\tfrac {vT}2\right)^2+\left(\tfrac {wT}2\right)^2-2\left(\tfrac {vT}2\right)\left(\tfrac {wT}2\right)\cos (\pi-\beta) \tag{4}\\ (3)+(4):\hspace{2cm}\\ R^2+\left(\tfrac 12 gT^2\right)^2 &=2\big(\left(\tfrac {vT}2\right)^2+\left(\tfrac {wT}2\right)^2\big) \\ v^2+w^2&=\tfrac 12 \left(g^2T^2+\tfrac {4R^2}{T^2}\right)\\ &=\tfrac 12\underbrace{\left(gT-\tfrac {2R}T\right)^2}_{\ge0}+2gR\\ &\ge 2gR\\ {v^*}^2+{w^*}^2&=2gR \end{align}$$ which is as used in equation $(1)$ above, with $^*$ indicating quantities corresponding to the minimum velocity case.

This occurs when ${T^*}^2=\tfrac {2R}g$, i.e. $\tfrac 12g{T^*}^2=R$. Using this and from the diagram we deduce that $\beta^*=\frac {\pi}2$, i.e. at minimum $v,w$, both $\mathbf v, \mathbf w$ are perpendicular to each other. This is shown in the diagram below.

$\hspace{4cm}$enter image description here

To deduce the values of $\theta$ and $\phi$, consider the triangles shown below.

$\hspace{4cm}$enter image description here

From first triangle, $$\begin{align} (\theta-\alpha)+(\phi+\alpha)&=\tfrac \pi 2\\ \theta+\phi&=\tfrac\pi 2\tag{5} \end{align}$$

From the lower two triangles,

$$\begin{align} (\tfrac\pi2-\theta)+(\phi+\alpha)&=\tfrac\pi2\\ \theta-\phi&=\alpha\tag{6}\\ \tfrac 12 \big((5)\pm (6)\big):\quad\qquad\\ \theta&=\tfrac\pi4+\tfrac\alpha2\\ \phi&=\tfrac\pi4-\tfrac\alpha2 \end{align}$$

which are launch and terminal angles corresponding to the minimum velocity case.

Conversely this also gives the well-known result, where the optimal launch angle to achieve maximum distance in direction $\alpha$ is one that bisects $\alpha$ and the vertical.

** An alternative Second Scenario would be a composite motion of the following:

  • $(1)$ vertical launch at $gT$ under gravity for time $T$ (distance travelled: $\frac 12gT^2$), and
  • $(2)$ motion at constant velocity $\mathbf w$ for time $T$ (distance travelled: $wT$) and

Alternative Interpretation

An alternative interpretation to the results might be given as follows. Refer to the diagram below.

$\hspace{3cm}$enter image description here

Let $A$ be the highest point reached by the particle under the scenario above where it travels half the time at constant initial launch velocity under zero gravity. The vertical distances from $A$ to $O,P$ are $\frac {R+h}2$ and $\frac {R-h}2$ respectively.

For a particle dropped from a height $H$ from the ground and falling vertically under gravity, its velocity upon reaching the ground is $\sqrt{2gH}$. Similarly, a particle under free fall of gravity, when launched vertically upwards at a velocity if $\sqrt{2gH}$, will reach a height of $H$. Here we refer to $\sqrt{2gH}$ as the vertical launch velocity for height $H$.

The magnitudes of the initial and terminal velocities of the projectile, $v^*,w^*$ are equal to the vertical launch velocities for heights $\frac {R+h}2, \frac {R-h}2$ respectively, i.e.

$${v^*}^2=2g\left(\tfrac {R+h}2\right)=g(R+h)\\ {w^*}^2=2g\left(\tfrac {R-h}2\right)=g(R-h)\\$$ which gives $${v^*}^2+{w^*}^2=2gR$$ and also $$v^*w^*=g\sqrt{R^2-h^2}=gk$$

MUCH EARLIER SOLUTION (Not so neat) (Posted 5 March 2018)

Note that $w^2=v^2-2gh$. Since $h$ is fixed, therefore minimum $w$ corresponds to minimum $v$.

Let $v^*, w^*$ be the minimum values of $v, w$ respectively. $$\begin{align} v^2w^2&=v^2(v^2-2gh)\\ &=v^2\left[v^2-2g\left(k\tan\theta-\frac {gk^2}{2v^2}(\tan^2\theta+1)\right)\right]\\ &=v^4-2gkv^2\tan\theta+g^2k^2\tan^2\theta+g^2k^2\\ &=\underbrace{\left(v^2-gk\tan\theta\right)^2}_{\ge 0}+g^2k^2\\ &\ge g^2k^2\\ \color{red}{v^*w^*}&\color{red}{=gk\qquad\blacksquare}\end{align}$$ This occurs when ${v^\ }^2={v^*}^2=gk\tan\theta$.

Additional Note

It can be shown that $\tan\theta=\dfrac {R+h}k$, where $R=\sqrt{k^2+h^2}$.

Hence $${v^*}^2=g(R+h)\\ {w^*}^2=g(R-h)$$

| cite | improve this answer | |

This is a complement to the previously posted answer. While solving this problem I realized that the set-up also serves to prove another interesting fact. That is, the flight times of the optimal trajectories to the target depend only on $R=\sqrt{h^2+k^2}$, independent of inclination.

In the second picture below, when the minimum energy projectile thrown from $A$ reaches $D$, a "projectile" released with zero velocity from $A$ will reach point $G$. In addition, projectiles thrown with parallel velocities (including zero velocity) from the point of origin at the same time remain forming a line parallel to the original velocity at all subsequent times. Therefore, $GD$ (being the line joining the projectiles at $G$ and $D$ at time $t_f$) is parallel to $AX$ (that is, $\vec{v}\parallel AX\parallel GD$), thus, $\angle{BDG}$ is a right angle and $G$ is also in the circumference. Therefore, the flight time for all minimum energy projectiles is the same as an object falling from $A$ to $G$, given by $\sqrt{\frac{2R}{g}}$.


Second, more explicit derivation

Using a bit of trigonometry, we show that the smallest initial velocity $\vec{v}$ of the projectile to reach a distance of $R$ in a direction forming an angle of $\alpha$ with the horizontal is attained when the $\vec{v}$ direction bisects the angle between the vertical and $\alpha$. Part of the interest of this answer is that it does not use calculus either.

First, we calculate the range of the projectile in the direction given by $\alpha$ when being thrown with an arbitrary velocity $\vec{v}$ forming an angle $\theta$ with the horizontal. Following the same reasoning as in the previous diagram, we deduce that is $KH\parallel\vec{v}$ (in the second picture below). We can immediately see that the $\angle AHK=\theta-\alpha$, and $$ \frac{gt_f^2}{2}= \frac{R\sin(\theta-\alpha)}{\cos\theta}~~.\tag{1}$$


Furthermore, it is also clear that, since there is no acceleration in the $\hat{x}$ direction, $$ R\cos\alpha=vt_f\cos\theta~~.\tag{2}$$ From (1) and (2) we deduce $$R=\frac{v^2}{g}\frac{2\cos(\theta)\sin(\theta-\alpha)}{\cos^2\alpha}=\frac{v^2}{g}\frac{(\sin(2\theta-\alpha)-\sin(\alpha))}{\cos^2\alpha}~~,\tag{3}$$ from where it is very clear that the maximum range is given by $2\theta-\alpha=\pi/2~~$ (or $\theta$ bisects the angle between $AH$ and the vertical). In turn, the maximum range is given by $\frac{v^2}{g(1+\sin\alpha)}$.

Concluding, by squaring (1) $$\begin{align} t_f^4&= \left(\frac{2R}{g}\right)^2\frac{\sin^2((\pi/2-\alpha)/2)}{\cos^2((\pi/2+\alpha)/2)}\qquad;\theta=(\pi/2+\alpha)/2\\ &=\left(\frac{2R}{g}\right)^2 \frac{\frac{1-\cos(\pi/2-\alpha)}{2}}{\frac{1+\cos(\pi/2+\alpha)}{2}}\\ &=\left(\frac{2R}{g}\right)^2 \frac{1-\sin\alpha}{1-\sin\alpha}\\ &=\left(\frac{2R}{g}\right)^2~~, \end{align} $$ therefore $t_f=\sqrt{\frac{2R}{g}}$, that is, the same result as in the first answer with $t_f$ independent of $\alpha$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • $\begingroup$ Interesting! (+1). For the free fall case, terminal velocity is $\sqrt{gR}$. For the inclined case, minimum terminal velocity is $w^*=\sqrt{g(R-h)}$, and the corresponding minimum launch velocity is $v^*=\sqrt{g(R+h)}$, the product of which is $v^*w^*=g\sqrt{R^2-h^2}=gk$. Given the additional insight from your new solution, can this be derived using some transformation of the free fall case, or perhaps the horizontal case? $\endgroup$ – Hypergeometricx Mar 1 '18 at 8:47
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks! I am glad you find it interesting. Respect to your question, I am not sure. I'll keep thinking.. $\endgroup$ – Enredanrestos Mar 1 '18 at 9:23
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a missing $\cos^2\alpha$ in the denominator of $(3)$? $\endgroup$ – Hypergeometricx Mar 1 '18 at 10:31
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes there is . Sorry, I'll fix it right away. Fortunately, it does not affect the last derivation. $\endgroup$ – Enredanrestos Mar 1 '18 at 12:59
  • $\begingroup$ Could you please elaborate further on the point in the second paragraph of your solution (first derivation)? $\endgroup$ – Hypergeometricx Mar 13 '18 at 16:51

(Using vectors)

$\hspace{5cm}$enter image description here

Let $\mathbf v,\mathbf w$ be the initial (launch) and terminal velocity vectors of the projectile, and $\beta$ be the angle between them.
$\hspace{5cm}$enter image description here

The projectile motion can be modelled as

(i) EITHER as a composite motion of the following:

  • motion at constant velocity $\mathbf v$ for time $T$ (distance travelled: $vT$) and

  • vertical free fall under gravity for time $T$ (distance travelled: $\frac 12gT^2$).

(ii) OR as a composite motion of the following:

  • upward vertical launch at velocity $gT$ under gravity for time $T$ (distance travelled: $\frac 12gT^2$), and

  • motion at constant velocity $\mathbf w$ for time $T$ (distance travelled: $wT$) and

Let $\mathbf R$ be the direction vector for $\vec{OP}$, and $\mathbf g$ the gravity vector.

Distance equations for both equivalent composite motions above are as follows:

$$\begin{align} \mathbf R&=\mathbf vT+\tfrac 12 \mathbf gT^2\tag{1}\\ \mathbf R&=\mathbf wT-\tfrac 12 \mathbf gT^2\tag{2}\\\\ \tfrac {(1)+(2)}T:\hspace {6.5cm} (\mathbf v+\mathbf w)&=\tfrac 2T \mathbf R\tag{A}\\ \tfrac {(1)-(2)}T:\hspace{6.5cm} (\mathbf v- \mathbf w) &= \mathbf gT\tag{B}\\\\ (\text A)\cdot (\text B):\hspace{5cm} (\mathbf v+\mathbf w)\cdot (\mathbf v-\mathbf w)&=2\mathbf R\cdot \mathbf g\color{lightgrey}{=2(R\sin\alpha) g}\\ v^2-w^2&=2gh\tag{I}\\\\ (\text A)\cdot (\text A):\hspace {1cm} (\mathbf v+\mathbf w)\cdot (\mathbf v+\mathbf w)=v^2+w^2+2vw\cos\beta &=\tfrac {4R^2}{T^2}\tag {IIa}\\ (\text B)\cdot (\text B):\hspace {1cm} (\mathbf v-\mathbf w)\cdot (\mathbf v-\mathbf w)=v^2+w^2-2vw\cos\beta &={g^2T^2}\tag {IIb}\\ \tfrac12\big((\text{IIa})+(\text{IIb})\big):\hspace{4.5cm} v^2+w^2\qquad \qquad \;\; &=\tfrac 12 \big(\tfrac {4R^2}{T^2}+g^2T^2\big)\\ &=\tfrac 12 \underbrace{\big(\tfrac {2R}T-gT\big)^2}_{\ge 0}+2gR\\ &\ge 2gR\\ {v^*}^2+{w^*}^2&=2gR\tag{II}\\ (T^*&=\tfrac{2R}g)\\\\ \tfrac 12 \big((\text{I})\pm(\text{II})\big):\hspace{7.5cm} {v^*}^2&=g(R+h)\\ {w^*}^2&=g(R-h)\\\\ {v^*}^2{w^*}^2&=g^2(R^2-h^2)=g^2k^2\\ \color{red}{v^*w^*}&\color{red}{=gk} \end{align}$$

Alternatively we can bypass steps (I), (II) and arrive at the required result directly from (A), (B) as follows:

$$ \begin{align} (\text{A})\times(\text{B}):\hspace{5cm} (\mathbf v+\mathbf w)\times (\mathbf v - \mathbf w) &=\tfrac 2T \mathbf R \times \mathbf gT\\ 2\big|\mathbf v\times \mathbf w\big| &=2\big|\mathbf R \times \mathbf g\big|\\ vw\sin\beta&=(R\cos\alpha)g\\ &=gk\\ \color{red}{v^*w^*}&\color{red}{=gk}\hspace{1cm} \end{align} $$ with minimum values of $v,w$ occuring when at maximum $\sin\beta(=1)$, i.e. at $\beta=\tfrac {\pi}2$.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.