1
$\begingroup$

For all polynomials $q\in\mathbb Z[X]$ and all $n\in \mathbb N$ $$\exists k\in\mathbb N: q(p_n)\equiv q(-2k)\pmod{p_{n+1}}$$ Where $p_n$ is the $n$-th prime.

This conjecture is tested for random polynomials and seems to hold. Are there counterexamples? Is it a known conjecture? Is it trivial?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Am I right guessing that $\;p_n\;$ is the $\;n\,-$ th prime? $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Feb 17 '18 at 22:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Please edit your question so that one can understand it without any guesswork. $\endgroup$ – Mariano Suárez-Álvarez Feb 17 '18 at 22:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Maybe the quantifiers are throwing me, but isn't this trivial? After all $q(p_n)\equiv q(p_n+mp_{n+1})\pmod {p_{n+1}}$ for all $m$ so just take $m$ to be any negative number (setting it's parity as needed). $\endgroup$ – lulu Feb 17 '18 at 22:58
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $p_n=p_{n+1}-2k\equiv-2k\,(\textrm{mod }p_{n+1})$, right? So then $q$ of the LHS $\equiv$ $q$ of the RHS, for any $q$. $\endgroup$ – Ant Feb 17 '18 at 23:00
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @JohnChessant: yes of course. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – Lehs Feb 17 '18 at 23:12
4
$\begingroup$

Because $p_n\equiv p_n-p_{n+1}\pmod {p_{n+1}}$, you can take $k=\frac{1}{2}(p_{n+1}-p_n)$, which will give you $p_n-p_{n+1}=-2k$. Thus, $q(p_n)\equiv q(p_n-p_{n+1})=q(-2k)\pmod {p_{n+1}}$.

This doesn't work for $k=1$, but then $q(2)\equiv q(-4)\pmod 3$ and you can take $k=2$, for example.

We have used the fact that $a\equiv b\pmod n$ implies $q(a)\equiv q(b)\pmod n$ for any $a,b,n\in\mathbb Z$, $n\gt 0$ and any $q\in\mathbb Z[x]$.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.