Initially I wanted to compute $$\int_{0}^{1/e} \frac{\log \left(\frac{1}{x}\right)}{(\log^2 (x)-1)^{3/2}} \mathrm{dx}$$ but it seems that Mathematica says that the integral diverges. I thought of
some variable change, but I also wonder if there is something easy to prove
it diverges. Any hint / suggestion here would be precious to me. Thanks!


Try substituting $x=e^{-u-1}$ to get $$ \int_0^\infty\frac{u+1}{(u^2+2u)^{3/2}}e^{-u-1}\mathrm{d}u =\int_0^\infty\color{#00A000}{\frac{u+1}{(u+2)^{3/2}e}}\color{#C00000}{u^{-3/2}}\color{#0000FF}{e^{-u}}\mathrm{d}u $$ The part in green is bounded over the positive reals. $e^{-u}$ would be integrable at $\infty$, but the factor of $u^{-3/2}$ is not integrable at $0$.

Therefore, the integral does not converge.

  • $\begingroup$ Nice answer (+1) $\endgroup$ – user 1591719 Dec 26 '12 at 18:14

Making the change of variables $ x=e^{-(t+1)} $ gives

$$ \int _{0}^{\infty }\!{\frac { \left( t+1 \right) {{\rm e}^{-t-1}}}{{ t}^{3/2} \left( t+2 \right) ^{3/2}}}{dt}. $$

The integrand behaves as $c\,t^{-3/2}$ as $t \to 0 $.

  • $\begingroup$ Nice answer (+1) $\endgroup$ – user 1591719 Dec 26 '12 at 18:15
  • $\begingroup$ @Chris'ssister: You are welcome. $\endgroup$ – Mhenni Benghorbal Dec 26 '12 at 18:25

$\newcommand{\+}{^{\dagger}} \newcommand{\angles}[1]{\left\langle\, #1 \,\right\rangle} \newcommand{\braces}[1]{\left\lbrace\, #1 \,\right\rbrace} \newcommand{\bracks}[1]{\left\lbrack\, #1 \,\right\rbrack} \newcommand{\ceil}[1]{\,\left\lceil\, #1 \,\right\rceil\,} \newcommand{\dd}{{\rm d}} \newcommand{\down}{\downarrow} \newcommand{\ds}[1]{\displaystyle{#1}} \newcommand{\expo}[1]{\,{\rm e}^{#1}\,} \newcommand{\fermi}{\,{\rm f}} \newcommand{\floor}[1]{\,\left\lfloor #1 \right\rfloor\,} \newcommand{\half}{{1 \over 2}} \newcommand{\ic}{{\rm i}} \newcommand{\iff}{\Longleftrightarrow} \newcommand{\imp}{\Longrightarrow} \newcommand{\isdiv}{\,\left.\right\vert\,} \newcommand{\ket}[1]{\left\vert #1\right\rangle} \newcommand{\ol}[1]{\overline{#1}} \newcommand{\pars}[1]{\left(\, #1 \,\right)} \newcommand{\partiald}[3][]{\frac{\partial^{#1} #2}{\partial #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\pp}{{\cal P}} \newcommand{\root}[2][]{\,\sqrt[#1]{\vphantom{\large A}\,#2\,}\,} \newcommand{\sech}{\,{\rm sech}} \newcommand{\sgn}{\,{\rm sgn}} \newcommand{\totald}[3][]{\frac{{\rm d}^{#1} #2}{{\rm d} #3^{#1}}} \newcommand{\ul}[1]{\underline{#1}} \newcommand{\verts}[1]{\left\vert\, #1 \,\right\vert} \newcommand{\wt}[1]{\widetilde{#1}}$ $\ds{\int_{0}^{1/\expo{}}{\ln\pars{1/x} \over \bracks{\ln^{2}\pars{x} - 1}^{3/2}} \,\dd x:\ {\large ?}}$

With $\ds{\pars{~x \equiv \expo{-t}\quad\imp\quad t = -\ln\pars{x}~}\quad}$ and $\ds{\quad\Lambda > \expo{}}$: \begin{align}&\color{#c00000}{% \int_{0}^{1/\Lambda}{\ln\pars{1/x} \over \bracks{\ln^{2}\pars{x} - 1}^{3/2}} \,\dd x} =\int_{\infty}^{\ln\pars{\Lambda}}{t \over \pars{t^{2} - 1}^{3/2}}\,\pars{-\expo{-t}\,\dd t} \\[3mm]&=-\int_{t\ =\ \ln\pars{\Lambda}}^{t\ \to\ \infty} \expo{-t}\dd\bracks{\pars{t^{2} - 1}^{-1/2}} ={1 \over \Lambda\root{\ln^{2}\pars{\Lambda} - 1}} -\int_{\ln\pars{\Lambda}}^{\infty}{\expo{-t} \over \root{t^{2} - 1}}\,\dd t \\[3mm]&={1 \over \Lambda\root{\ln^{2}\pars{\Lambda} - 1}} -\int_{\ln\pars{\Lambda}}^{1}{\expo{-t} \over \root{t^{2} - 1}}\,\dd t -\ \underbrace{\int_{1}^{\infty}{\expo{-t} \over \root{t^{2} - 1}}\,\dd t} _{\ds{=\ {\rm K}_{0}\pars{1}}} \end{align} where $\ds{{\rm K}_{\nu}\pars{z}}$ is a Modiffied Bessel Function. See ${\bf\mbox{9.6.23}}$.

The first term, in the right hand side, shows clearly the divergence: $$ {1 \over \Lambda\root{\ln^{2}\pars{\Lambda} - 1}} \sim {1 \over \root{2\expo{}}}\,{1 \over \pars{\Lambda - \expo{}}^{1/2}}\,, \qquad \Lambda \gtrsim \expo{} $$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.