1
$\begingroup$

Let $a_1,...,a_n $ non negative integers s.t. $a_1+...+a_n=2011$, where $n $ is a positive integer, $n\geq3$ and $a_1\leq |a_2-a_3|$, $a_2\leq|a_3-a_4|$,..., $a_n\leq|a_1-a_2|$.

This problem is similar to What can I say about the minimum and the maximum value of $n $?, only that here the $a_n$ are allowed to be zero.

I have an answer but I am not sure if it is right.

I have to take two cases: $a_3\leq a_2$ or $a_2\leq a_3$.

If $a_3\leq a_2\Rightarrow |a_2-a_3|=a_2-a_3\Rightarrow a_1\leq a_2-a_3\Rightarrow a_1\leq a_2\Rightarrow |a_1-a_2|=a_2-a_1\Rightarrow a_n\leq a_2\Rightarrow a_{n-1}\leq|a_n-a_1|\leq a_2\Rightarrow...\Rightarrow a_4\leq a_2\Rightarrow |a_3-a_4|\leq a_2.$

But $a_2\leq |a_3-a_4|$. Then $|a_1-a_2|=|a_3-a_4|=...=|a_n-a_1|=a_2$.

So $a_1=a_3=a_5=...=0$ and $a_2=a_4=a_6=...$.

Therefore $k\cdot a_2=2011\Rightarrow a_2=1$ and $k=2011$ $\Rightarrow n=4022$.

The other case is similar.

I don't want to post it but I am just curious!!! It is right my argument?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ I do not understand why this is so heavily qownvoted. It is a clear question for proof-verification, showing more effort than many other questions. So pointing out the error ("positive" vs "non-negative") as a comment or answer should be sufficient. $\endgroup$ – Martin R Feb 16 '18 at 20:11
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Problemsolving: I have taken the liberty to edit your question, hoping to make it clearer. Please check the edit. $\endgroup$ – Martin R Feb 16 '18 at 20:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Martin R $a_{n-1}\leq |a_n-a_1|\leq$ max{$a_n,a_1$}$\leq a_2$. $\endgroup$ – Problemsolving Feb 16 '18 at 20:48
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Martin R 1,1,1...,1 is not solution. $\endgroup$ – Problemsolving Feb 16 '18 at 21:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Problemsolving: You are right, that was nonsense. But a 0 can be followed by one or two 1s: "0, 1, 0, 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1, ..." $\endgroup$ – Martin R Feb 16 '18 at 21:15
2
$\begingroup$

The conclusion

Then $|a_1-a_2|=|a_3-a_4|=...=|a_n-a_1|=a_2$.

is not correct, as can be seen by considering the sequence $$ 1, 1, 0, 1, 0, \ldots 1, 0 $$ but I think you were close.

Let $$ x = \max(a_1, \ldots, a_n) $$ The $a_i$ cannot all be equal, so (by rotating the indices if necessary) we can assume that $a_1 = x$ and $a_n \ne x$.

If $a_2 \le a_3$ then $$ x = a_1 \le a_3 - a_2 \le x \Longrightarrow a_2 = 0, a_3 = x \, . $$ Otherwise $$ x = a_1 \le a_2 - a_3 \le x \Longrightarrow a_2 = x, a_3 = 0 $$ which implies $$ x = a_2 \le |a_3 - a_4| = a_4 \le x \Longrightarrow a_4 = x \, . $$ So the sequence starts either with $$ x, 0, x, \ldots $$ or with $$ x, x, 0, x, \ldots $$ Now the same argument can be repeated with $a_3=x$ or $a_4=x$, respectively, and one sees that the entire sequence consists of the “building blocks” $$ x, 0 \quad \text{and} \quad x, x, 0 $$ which can be arbitrarily combined. Finally, since the sum of all elements is $2011$ (which is a prime number), we necessarily have $x = 1$.

Therefore the solutions are exactly the sequences made of the building blocks $$ 1, 0 \quad \text{and} \quad 1, 1, 0 $$ with a total number of $2011$ one's (and rotations thereof).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.