I am having some trouble with the following question:

Let $f(x)=(x^5-3)(x^5-7)\in\Bbb Q[x]$. Find the degree of the splitting field of $f$ over $\Bbb Q$, and determine the Galois group of $f$ over $\Bbb Q$.

I noticed that $x^5-3$ and $x^5-7$ are irreducible in $\Bbb Q[x]$, and so their Galois groups are isomorphic to a transitive subgroup of $S_5$. I also found that the splitting fields of these two quintics are $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[5] 3,\alpha)$ and $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[5] 7,\alpha)$ where $\alpha^5=1$. Since $\alpha$ has degree $4$ over $\Bbb Q$ and $\sqrt[5] 3,\sqrt[5] 7$ have degree $5$ over $\Bbb Q$, we have that the degrees of these splitting fields are $20$. Hence, we have $$\operatorname{Gal}(x^5-3/\Bbb Q)\cong F_{20}\cong \operatorname{Gal}(x^5-7/\Bbb Q) $$ But now I'm supposed to use a theorem we proved that $\operatorname{Gal}(f/\Bbb Q)$ is a subgroup of the direct product of the above Galois groups. I am not sure how to do this: i.e., $\color{red}{\text{how to determine which subgroup $\operatorname{Gal}(f/\Bbb Q)$ corresponds to}}$.

For the degree of the splitting field of $f$ over $\Bbb Q$, I argued that it is $100$ since the compositum $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[5] 7,\alpha)\Bbb Q(\sqrt[5] 3,\alpha)=\Bbb Q(\sqrt[5] 3,\sqrt[5] 7,\alpha)$ has degree $5\cdot 5\cdot 4=100$ over $\Bbb Q$. $\color{red}{\text{Does this make sense}}$?

I also had another question to determine the Galois group of $(x^3-2)(x^4-2)$ over $\Bbb Q$. I showed that $x^3-2$ has Galois group $S_3$ and $x^4-2$ has Galois group $D_4$. Then I argued that the intersection of the two splitting fields, $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]2,\omega)\cap\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]2,i)$ is just $\Bbb Q$, so we have $\operatorname{Gal}((x^3-2)(x^4-2)/\Bbb Q)\cong S_3\times D_4$. $\color{red}{\text{Does this make sense}}$? In order to show $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]2,\omega)\cap\Bbb Q(\sqrt[4]2,i)=\Bbb Q$ I just argued that $\sqrt[4]2,i\notin\Bbb Q(\sqrt[3]2,\omega)$, $\color{red}{\text{is this sufficient}}$?

  • $\begingroup$ Can't you use the theorem you just used in the last part to solve the first one? Once that $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]3,\sqrt[5]7)\cap \mathbb{Q}(\alpha)=\mathbb{Q}$, $$Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]3,\sqrt[5]7)\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)/\mathbb{Q})\cong Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]3,\sqrt[5]7)/\mathbb{Q})\times Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)/\mathbb{Q})\cong Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]3)/\mathbb{Q}) \times Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]7)/\mathbb{Q}) \times Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)/\mathbb{Q})\cong \mathbb{Z}_5 \times \mathbb{Z}_5 \times Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)/\mathbb{Q}).$$ $\endgroup$ – TPace Feb 15 '18 at 22:34
  • $\begingroup$ Ah! I think that makes sense, so in this case $\operatorname{Gal}(\Bbb Q(\alpha)/\Bbb Q)\cong C_4$? $\endgroup$ – Dave Feb 15 '18 at 22:40
  • $\begingroup$ It may be $V_4$ too! $\endgroup$ – TPace Feb 15 '18 at 22:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ But if $\alpha $ is a 5th root of unity, wouldn't its galois group just permute the roots of $x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1$ like a 4-cycle, or am I wrong? $\endgroup$ – Dave Feb 15 '18 at 22:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Then you need to write down the effect of the order four generator of $F_{20}$, i.e. the automorphism determined by $\alpha\mapsto\alpha^2,\root5\of3\mapsto\root5\of3, \root5\of7\mapsto\root5\of7$. I didn't fully justify everything, but it looks like you shoud get a semi-direct product $(C_5\times C_5)\rtimes C_4$ as the answer. $\endgroup$ – Jyrki Lahtonen Feb 16 '18 at 6:05

On the first "Does this make sense?": Yes, it pretty much does. Using the tower law, we get that $$[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]3,\sqrt[5]7,\alpha):\mathbb{Q}]=[\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]3,\sqrt[5]7,\alpha):\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]7,\alpha)][\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]7,\alpha):\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)][\mathbb{Q}(\alpha):\mathbb{Q}]=5*5*4=100.$$ On your second "Does this make sense?": Yes, it also does. If $K_1$ and $K_2$ are Galois extensions and $K_1 \cap K_2=F$, $$Gal(K_1K_2/F)\cong Gal(K_1/F)\times Gal(K_2/F).$$ So, if $K_1=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]2,\omega)$ and $K_2=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]2,i)$ and $Gal(K_1/\mathbb{Q})\cong S_3$ and $Gal(K_2/\mathbb{Q})\cong D_4$, we get the result you got. However, I think that you could be more complete when arguing that $K_1\cap K_2=\mathbb{Q}$, explaining it a bit more- even though you're not wrong.

On the first part, as we argued in the comment section, $Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]3,\sqrt[5]7,\alpha)/\mathbb{Q})\cong C_5^2\times C_4$. This is due to the fact that, once $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]3,\sqrt[5]7)\cap \mathbb{Q}(\alpha)=\mathbb{Q},$

$$Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]3,\sqrt[5]7,\alpha)/\mathbb{Q})\cong Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]3,\sqrt[5]7)/\mathbb{Q})\times Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)/\mathbb{Q})\cong Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]7)/\mathbb{Q})\times Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[5]3)/\mathbb{Q})\times Gal(\mathbb{Q}(\alpha)/\mathbb{Q})\cong C_5\times C_5 \times C_4=C_5^2\times C_4 $$

| cite | improve this answer | |
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Really appreciate the help here. How would I show more concretely that $\Bbb Q(\alpha)\cap \Bbb Q(\sqrt[5] 3,\sqrt[5] 7)=\Bbb Q$? $\endgroup$ – Dave Feb 15 '18 at 23:16
  • $\begingroup$ Let $x$ be in the intersection of both splitting fields. If $1,b_1,...,b_n$ are basis elements of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]2,\omega)$ and $1,c_1,...,c_m$ of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[4]2,i)$, then $x=a_0+a_1b_1+...+a_nb_n=d_0+d_1c_1+...+d_mc_m$, where $a_i$ and $b_i$ are rationals. Suppose $a_i,b_i\neq0$. As a consequence, $b_1=\frac{-(a_0+a_2b_2+...+a_nb_n)+d_0+d_1c_1+...+d_mc_m}{a_1}$. This, however, isn't true in this case, so that $a_i=b_i=0, i>0$. This proves what we wanted, in the sense that $x$ must be strictly a member of the rationals. $\endgroup$ – TPace Feb 15 '18 at 23:50
  • $\begingroup$ Does it solve all your questions? $\endgroup$ – TPace Feb 16 '18 at 0:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I am going through my notes and I just realized that we can't really define the Galois group of $\Bbb Q(\sqrt[5] 3)$ or other similar ones as they are not splitting fields of separable polynomials. I understand that we can still talk about their automorphism groups, but in my lectures we cannot classify them as Galois groups. I believe I have made a decent argument to get the result above though. Thanks for the help. $\endgroup$ – Dave Feb 16 '18 at 0:57
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The Galois groups of $x^5-3$ and $x^5-7$ are isomorphic to $F_{20}$. They are definitely not abelian. Hence the sought after Galois group cannot be abelian either. Your mistake is in writing $Gal(\Bbb{Q}(\root5\of3,\root5\of7)/\Bbb{Q})$. That extension is not Galois. The field $K=\Bbb{Q}(\root5\of3,\root5\of7)$ is real, so both $x^5-3$ and $x^5-7$ have a single zero in $K$ only. Therefore $K$ has only a single automorphism - the idenitity. $\endgroup$ – Jyrki Lahtonen Feb 16 '18 at 5:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.