5
$\begingroup$

I was looking at my slide rule earlier today, and happened to notice that the dedicated mark for $\pi$ is right around the middle of the scale:

slide rule with pi circled

Of course, this is because $\log_{10}\pi \simeq 0.4971498$, which is very close to $1\over2$.

Is there a reason or derivation for this, or is it pure coincidence?

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Wow, that brings back memories. I haven't seen a slide rule for years. $\endgroup$ – Robert Israel Feb 13 '18 at 21:57
  • $\begingroup$ @RobertIsrael I've never used it! $\endgroup$ – user Feb 13 '18 at 21:59
  • $\begingroup$ According to Wikipedia, "This coincidence was used in the design of slide rules, where the "folded" scales are folded on $\pi$ rather than $\sqrt{10}$ because it is a more useful number and has the effect of folding the scales in about the same place" $\endgroup$ – David Quinn Feb 13 '18 at 22:27
  • $\begingroup$ That page on Mathematical coincidences also notes that this is the reason the gravitational constant $g\approx10 m/s^2$, because a meter was originally defined as the length of a pendulum with a half period of 1 second, and $T_{1\over2}\approx\pi\sqrt{L\over{g}} \implies g\approx\pi^2$ $\endgroup$ – kgutwin Feb 16 '18 at 20:41
3
$\begingroup$

$\pi^2\approx 10$ is not a coincidence. Since $\zeta(2)=\frac{\pi^2}{6}$ we have $$ \pi^2 = 6+\sum_{n\geq 2}\frac{6}{n^2} \leq 6+\sum_{n\geq 2}\frac{6}{n^2-\frac{1}{4}}=10 $$ and the difference between the RHS and the LHS is $$ 10-\pi^2=\sum_{n\geq 2}\frac{6}{n^2(4n^2-1)}\leq \frac{1}{10}+\sum_{n\geq 3}\frac{24}{(4n^2-9)(4n^2-1)}=\frac{29}{210}. $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ How is the $\sum\limits_{n \geq 2} \frac{6}{n^2-1/4}=4$? $\endgroup$ – Botond Feb 13 '18 at 22:14
  • $\begingroup$ Why it should demonstrate that it is not a coincidence? I don't see the reason. $\endgroup$ – user Feb 13 '18 at 22:15
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Botond: that is a telescopic series. $\endgroup$ – Jack D'Aurizio Feb 13 '18 at 22:15
  • $\begingroup$ @JackD'Aurizio Thanks, I'm going to check it. $\endgroup$ – Botond Feb 13 '18 at 22:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Botond: you may also have a look at the first section of my notes where the identity $\pi^2=\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{18}{n^2\binom{2n}{n}}\approx 10$ is proved through creative telescoping. $\endgroup$ – Jack D'Aurizio Feb 13 '18 at 22:17
6
$\begingroup$

Simply because

$$\sqrt{10}=10^{\frac12}\approx 3.16 \approx \pi$$

indeed

$$y=\log_{10}\pi\iff10^y=\pi$$

thus

$$y\approx \frac12$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I don't feel like this answer addresses OP's core question, "Is there a reason or derivation for this, or is it pure coincidence?" $\endgroup$ – Chris Culter Feb 13 '18 at 22:03
  • $\begingroup$ @ChrisCulter Interesting point! I'll think about it, post also your own answer if you have some idea to share! $\endgroup$ – user Feb 13 '18 at 22:04
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @ChrisCulter I think gimusi showed its reason: $\pi^2 \approx 10$. Maybe the $\Delta \log(a) < \Delta a$ could be added. $\endgroup$ – Botond Feb 13 '18 at 22:05
  • $\begingroup$ @ChrisCulter Anyway I think it is just a coincidence, indeed it is expressed in base-ten (for counting) which is an arbitrary choice. I'm wondering how it should be in base-2 or others. $\endgroup$ – user Feb 13 '18 at 22:09
  • $\begingroup$ @Botond Well, why is $\pi^2\approx10$? A satisfactory explanation would involve some argument beyond rearranging the equation and performing a numerical evaluation. If someone asks you why $\pi\approx3$, you don't evaluate some series and conclude that $3.14\approx3$; you should be drawing a regular hexagon inscribed in a circle. If someone asks why $\pi\approx\frac{22}{7}$, you should start talking about $\int_0^1 \frac{x^4\left(1-x\right)^4}{1+x^2} \, dx$. For $\pi^2\approx10$, Jack D'Aurizio suggests that the answer is implied by $\zeta(2)$; and there could be other explanations as well. $\endgroup$ – Chris Culter Feb 14 '18 at 8:53
3
$\begingroup$

I cannot see a very deep reason why this would be so, but the continued fraction of $\sqrt{10}$ is $3 + \frac{1}{6 + \frac{1}{6 + \cdots}}$ and a continued fraction for $\pi$ is $3 + \frac{1}{6 + \frac{9}{6 + \cdots}}$ so they at least agree to $3 + \frac{1}{6}$, which after all is not too bad of an estimate, being off by only 2 in the second decimal place.

I suppose it is worth noting that a general continued fraction for square roots of the form $\sqrt{a^2 + b} = a + \frac{b}{2a + \frac{b}{2a + \cdots}}$ then there is straightforwardly no better approximation to $\pi$ by the square root of an integer since $a$ is constrained to be $3$ and $b$ is constrained to be $1$ right at the start.

I'm not sure how to consider things "coincidental" at this level of navel gazing.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

$$\pi \approx 3.141592654 \implies log(\pi ) \approx .497149873$$ $$ \sqrt 10 \approx 3.162277660 \implies log \sqrt {10} =.5$$

They are not equal but very close.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your value of pi has a typo. 3.1*4* $\endgroup$ – JTP - Apologise to Monica Feb 14 '18 at 1:09
  • $\begingroup$ @JoeTaxpayer Thanks for the comment. I fixed it per your advice. $\endgroup$ – Mohammad Riazi-Kermani Feb 14 '18 at 1:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.