For an analytic function $f(z)$ with $z = x+iy$ one can derive the Cauchy Riemann conditions by using the interesting statement $$\frac{df}{d\bar z} = 0$$ I know how to derive the CR conditions from there on but what I don't really understand is why every $f$ must be independent of $\bar z$.
I don't feel it is enough to say that $f$ only depends on $z$ and that is why the statement must be true.
Since $z$ and $\bar z$ themselves both depend on $x$ and $y$ I wonder if there is deeper notion behind it.
My vague idea is that it maybe results from $x$ and $y$ being linearly independent but I can't really finish that thought.

  • $\begingroup$ The key idea of "analyticity" is that $f$ is a pure function of $z$, rather than $z$ and $\overline{z}$ (in which case, we would really be thinking of $f$ as a function of $x$ and $y$ separately). $\endgroup$ – user296602 Feb 13 '18 at 18:32
  • $\begingroup$ Oh, that makes sense. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – P-A Feb 13 '18 at 18:39

Cauchy-Riemann conditions: $\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}=\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}$ and $\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}=-\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}$, then with $\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x}=\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}+i\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}$ and $\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial y}=\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial y}+i\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial y}=-\dfrac{\partial v}{\partial x}+i\dfrac{\partial u}{\partial x}$, then \begin{align*} \dfrac{\partial f}{\partial\overline{z}}=\dfrac{1}{2}\left(\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial x}-\dfrac{1}{i}\dfrac{\partial f}{\partial y}\right)=0. \end{align*}


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.