3
$\begingroup$

In my numerics I need to show the following approximation:

$$ 7<\frac{5\phi e}{\pi}< 7.000069,$$

where $\phi = \dfrac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}$ is the Golden Ratio and $e$ is the Euler's constant as well.

Using an online calculator I got $$\color{red}{\frac{5\phi e}{\pi}\approx 7.000068914.}$$

I have tried using the Taylor series

$$ e=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!},$$

But This is not enough to approximate accurately the whole term.

Does anyone have an idea to approximate $\frac{5\phi e}{\pi}$ ? Some other methods have been used here How to prove that: $19.999<e^\pi-\pi<20$? and here Proving that: $9.9998\lt \frac{\pi^9}{e^8}\lt 10$?

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

Mimicking the approach shown in the mentioned question, both the continued fractions of $\phi$ and $e$ are simple and well-known. About $\frac{1}{\pi}$, one may use Ramanujan's fast convergent series to get $$ \frac{1}{\pi}\approx \frac{13562078735077}{30127364780832 \sqrt{2}}$$ with a relative error which is less than $3\cdot 10^{-8}$. Since $e\approx\frac{23225}{8544}$ with a relative error which is less than $3\cdot 10^{-9}$ and $\phi\approx \frac{4181}{2584}$ with a relative error which is less than $5\cdot 10^{-8}$, we have $$ \frac{5\phi e}{\pi}\approx7+\frac{1}{14690}$$ with a relative error which is less than $10^{-7}$, proving the claim.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

$\phi$ is simply $(1 + \sqrt 5)/2$. Square roots are easily approximable using Newton's method.

For $\pi$ you have lots and lots of very fast algorithms.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Part 1: $\frac{1}{\pi}$

Archimedes obtains: $ \frac{223}{71} < \pi<\frac{22}{7}$
Hence: $ \frac{7}{22} <\frac{1}{\pi}<\frac{71}{223}$
We'll also use a trick: $\pi\approx 3\to\frac{1}{\pi}\approx\frac{7}{21}$

Part 2: $\phi$

$\phi=\frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}\approx 1.618$

The golden ratio is connected to the Fibonacci numbers: 1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89…

And notably: $\phi=\displaystyle\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{F_{n+1}}{F_n}$

Here they are the first approximations:$\frac{2}{1};\frac{3}{2};\frac{5}{3};\frac{8}{5};\frac{13}{8};\frac{21}{13};\frac{34}{21};\frac{55}{34};\frac{89}{55}...$

We'll consider the intervals of: $\frac{21}{13}<\phi<\frac{34}{21}$ and $\frac{55}{34}<\phi<\frac{89}{55}$

Part 3: Euler’s constant

As: $e=\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n!}=\frac{1}{0!}+\frac{1}{1!}+\frac{1}{2!}+\frac{1}{3!}+...$

$e=2.5+\frac{1}{6}+\frac{1}{24}+\frac{1}{120}+\frac{1}{720}+...$

OK, $e$ is bigger than 2.6 (because 1/6 is evident bigger than 1/10) :

$2.6=\frac{26}{10}=\frac{13}{5}$

Euler’s number is also smaller than 2.72 (no proof ; and 2.75 is „too” big):

$2.72=2\frac{72}{100}=2\frac{18}{25}=\frac{68}{25}$

Finally

$5\phi\frac{1}{\pi}e$ :

-Lower part:
Version 1 (with the trick): $5*\frac{21}{13}*\frac{7}{21}*\frac{13}{5}=7 $

Version 2: $5*\frac{55}{34}*\frac{7}{22}*\frac{68}{25}=5*\frac{5*11}{34}*\frac{7}{2*11}*\frac{2*34}{5*5}=7 $

-Biggest part: Our convergence will be slow – we reduce into three tries:

First try: $5*\frac{34}{21}*\frac{7}{22}*\frac{68}{25}=5*\frac{34}{3*7}*\frac{7}{2*11}*\frac{2*34}{5*5}=\frac{34^2}{3*5*11}=\frac{1156}{165}=7.00(60)\approx 7.0061 $

Second try: $5*\frac{55}{34}*\frac{71}{223}*\frac{68}{25}=\frac{2*11*71}{223}\approx 7.0045 $

Third try: $5*\frac{89}{55}*\frac{7}{22}*\frac{68}{25}=\frac{7*34*89}{(5*11)^2}\approx 7.0023 $

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.