From a mathematical standpoint, I understand and I can solve the following: $$ \lim_{M\rightarrow\infty} \int_1^M \left({1 \over x}\right) \rightarrow \infty $$ Additionally, $$ \lim_{M\rightarrow\infty} \int_1^M \left({1 \over x^2}\right) \rightarrow 1 $$

This all makes mathematical sense to me. It's the geometric parts that confuse me. The family of of $ 1/x^p $ graphs look very similar to me, so it makes me wonder why $ 1/x $ doesn't converge to some value as well.

Especially considering the fact when you rotate $ 1/x $ and calculate the volume of that shape; it converges to some value. Again, mathematically, this makes sense because:

$$ \lim_{M\rightarrow\infty}\int_1^M \left({1 \over x}\right) dx > \lim_{M\rightarrow\infty} \int_1^M \pi\left({1 \over x^2}\right) dx $$

But the geometric implications of this are that a cross-section of such an object has an infinite area but the volume is some finite value.

My questions:

  1. Using an intuitive or geometric explanation, why doesn't $ 1\over x $ converge to some value?
  2. Why is the volume described above finite while the cross-section is infinite?

Edit: Changed $[]$ to $()$

  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Unfortunately, intuitition is not very helpful here. It is difficult to visualize whether a function tends to $0$ fast enough. Take for example $\frac{1}{x^{1.00001}}$. I doubt you can distinguish it visually from $\frac{1}{x}$ $\endgroup$ – Peter Feb 8 '18 at 20:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I noted that as well. Which only raises my curiosity even further. What's the "difference" (for a lack of a better term) between $ 1/x $ and $ 1/x^{1.000 ... 0001} $? Is the difference in area infinite? I struggle to understand that. $\endgroup$ – npengra317 Feb 8 '18 at 20:53
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Some folks use that notation for floor or ceiling. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Feb 8 '18 at 20:55
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ On the other hand, @npengra317, you have no problem visualising the 2D object having infinite width but finite area like the one below the curve $\frac{1}{x^2}$? I guess this should violate intuition in exactly the same way - yet we have all got used to it via years of maths' training. $\endgroup$ – user491874 Feb 8 '18 at 20:56
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ This is known as Gabriel's horn; or also, i believe, as Torricelli's trumpet... $\endgroup$ – Chris Custer Feb 9 '18 at 0:03

Suppose $\lim_{M\rightarrow\infty} \int_1^M \dfrac{dx}{x} $ exists. Letting $L$ be this limit, $\lim_{M\rightarrow\infty} \int_1^M \dfrac{dx}{x} =L$ so that, for any $c>0$ there is a $M(c)$ such that $0 \lt L-\int_1^M \dfrac{dx}{x} \lt c$ for $M > M(c)$. Choosing such an $M$, we also have $0 \lt L-\int_1^{2M} \dfrac{dx}{x} \lt c$ so that $0 \lt L-\int_1^{2M} \dfrac{dx}{x} =L-\int_1^{M} \dfrac{dx}{x}-\int_M^{2M} \dfrac{dx}{x} $ or $\int_M^{2M} \dfrac{dx}{x} \lt L-\int_1^{M} \dfrac{dx}{x} \lt c$.

But $\int_M^{2M} \dfrac{dx}{x} \gt \dfrac{M}{2M} =\dfrac12$.

This is a contradiction for $c < \dfrac12$.

This is, of course, a restating of the standard elementary proof that the harmonic sum diverges.


Here's something that may be helpful geometrically, borrowed from a classic argument about the harmonic series.

One argument for the divergence of the harmonic series goes as follows:

$$ \begin{align} &\frac12 + \frac13 + \frac14 + \frac15 + \frac16 + \frac17 + \frac18 + \dots \\ > &\frac12 + \frac14 + \frac14 + \frac18+ \frac18+ \frac18+ \frac18 + \dots \\ = &\frac12 + \left(\frac14 + \frac14\right) + \left(\frac18+ \frac18+ \frac18+ \frac18\right) + \dots \\ = &\frac12 + \frac12 + \frac12 + \dots \end{align} $$

Let's translate this into our integral. Imagine the area under the curve $\frac1x$. Fit a rectangle of area $\frac12$ between the points $(1,0),(2,0),(1,\frac12),(2,\frac12)$ -- this inside the area of the curve. Fit the next rectangle of area $\frac12$ between the points $(2,0),(4,0),(2,\frac14),(4,\frac14)$. In general the $i$th rectangle will be placed between the points $(2^{i-1},0),(2^i,0),(2^{i-1},\frac1{2^i}),(2^i,\frac1{2^i})$. No two rectangles overlap, and each rectangle has area $\frac12$. Since you can fit infinite rectangles of equal area under the integral, it must diverge.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.