0
$\begingroup$

I don't know if "binary function" is the correct name for the following?

I have the functions $f$, $g$, and their domains are only $1$ or $0$.

What is the correct notation for this?

I have the following (? are $1$ or $0$): \begin{align} f:?\rightarrow \mathbb R \tag 1 \end{align}

And for the vector-valued function $g$: \begin{align} g:?\rightarrow \mathbb R^n \tag 2 \end{align} where $g(?)=(g_1(?), \dots, g_n(?))$.

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ To clarify, the $?$ in your example is the set $\{0,1\}$? $\endgroup$ – Patrick Stevens Feb 6 '18 at 9:14
  • $\begingroup$ Hi @PatrickStevens! I guess it is the correct term. I mean $f$ could only take the values $f(1)$ or $f(0)$ and the same for $g$. $\endgroup$ – JDoeDoe Feb 6 '18 at 9:16
  • $\begingroup$ That's again not quite the same thing, but I think you mean that $f$'s domain is $\{0,1\}$ :P What you just said in your comment is equivalent to the range of $f$ being of size at most $2$. $\endgroup$ – Patrick Stevens Feb 6 '18 at 9:18
  • $\begingroup$ Hi @PatrickStevens Ah, my fault. I mean the domain/input for the function. The range is $\mathbb R$ for $f$. $\endgroup$ – JDoeDoe Feb 6 '18 at 9:24
  • $\begingroup$ A pseudo-boolean function appears to be almost what you want. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pseudo-Boolean_function?wprov=sfla1 $\endgroup$ – Mark Feb 6 '18 at 9:30
0
$\begingroup$

I do not think that the term "binary function" would be appropriate. Indeed, since a binary sequence is a function from $\mathbb{N}$ to $\{0, 1\}$, I would rather see a binary function as a function with range $\{0, 1\}$.

I have no good suggestion for a better name, but you could represent such a function as a pair of reals $(r_0, r_1)$ (where $f(0) = r_0$ and $f(1) = r_1$).

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

These are similar to two-element tuples, with indexes taken from $\{0,1\}$. The elements are reals or vectors.

Such tuples can be called doubles, couples, pairs or duads. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuple#Names_for_tuples_of_specific_lengths)

Then I would suggest duad functions.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ In US English, I've never heard/read duad, and wouldn't be sure what you meant if you had said "dyad" functions either. $\endgroup$ – Mark S. Feb 6 '18 at 10:58
  • $\begingroup$ @MarkS.: this is not US English, this is maths English. Check the Wikipedia entry. $\endgroup$ – Yves Daoust Feb 6 '18 at 11:01
  • $\begingroup$ What I mean to say is that I think this is rare enough to not be a great idea. Monad, triad, tuple, and pair are all relatively common in comparison. Even Wikipedia disagrees on how the greek duad should be used as en.wiktionary.org/wiki/duad suggests it's used in math for unordered pairs (what I've heard called a "doubleton" occasionally). $\endgroup$ – Mark S. Feb 6 '18 at 12:07

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.