1
$\begingroup$

I'm trying to prove this isomorphism. I defined this function

$$ \psi: M \rightarrow Hom(\mathbb{N}^{+}, M) \\ m \mapsto \phi(n) $$ where $$ \phi(n) = \begin{cases} e_M, & \text{if }n\text{ is even} \\ m, & \text{if }n\text{ is odd} \end{cases} $$

$\psi$ is obviously injective, and this shows that $|Hom(\mathbb{N^{+}}, M)| \ge |M|$. I have yet to show surjectivity, I've been told to use right inverse definition of surjectivity but I don't quite understand what to do.

edit- $\phi$ is definitely not a homomorphism, oops.

So the question is how would one define this homomorphism and then prove bijectivity.

$\endgroup$
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Are you sure $\phi$ is a monoidhommorphism $\mathbb N^+\to M$? $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Dec 21 '12 at 23:37
  • $\begingroup$ @HagenvonEitzen Huh, $\phi$ is clearly not a monoid homomorphism, not sure how I messed up that badly. $\endgroup$ – Herp Derpington Dec 21 '12 at 23:46
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a difference between $\mathbb{N}^+$ and plain old $\mathbb{N}$ here? $\endgroup$ – MartianInvader Dec 21 '12 at 23:55
  • $\begingroup$ @MartianInvader Just to be more explicit that it's $\mathbb{N} \cup 0$ $\endgroup$ – Herp Derpington Dec 21 '12 at 23:56
  • $\begingroup$ @HerpDerpington Actually, the notation $\mathbb N^+$ would suggest (to me at least) rather that $0\notin\mathbb N^+$, whereas $\mathbb N_0$ would sucggest $0\in \mathbb N_0$. In the context of (additive) mopnoids, however, it should clearly be $\mathbb N\cap\{0\}$. $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Dec 22 '12 at 6:33
3
$\begingroup$

The map $\psi$ cannot possibly be surjective. When $M = \mathbb{N}^+$, what element of $M$ would map to the identity of $\mathbb{N}^+$?

There is a standard isomorphism for these structures. Let $Hom_{mon}(A,B)$ stand for the set of monoid homomorphisms $A \to B$ where $A$ and $B$ are monoids, and let $\mathbb{N}^+ = \{0, 1, 2, 3, \ldots\}$ be the natural numbers as an additive monoid.

$$ \psi : M \to Hom_{mon}(\mathbb{N}^+, M) $$ where $\psi(m) : \mathbb{N}^+ \to M$ is the map defined by $\psi(m)(n) = n\cdot m = \underbrace{m + m + m +\cdots + m}_n$.

It should be fairly straightforward to show both injectivity and surjectivity of this mapping.

Hope this helps!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ $0 \mapsto id_{Hom(\mathbb{N}^{+}, M)}$. I don't see the problem? $\endgroup$ – Herp Derpington Dec 21 '12 at 23:40
  • $\begingroup$ @HerpDerpington No, according to your definition, $0$ maps to the homomorphism that takes each $n$ to $0$ (since both $e_M$ and $m$ are zero in this case). More importantly, it takes $1$ to a function that is not a homomorphism $\mathbb{N}^+ \rightarrow \mathbb{N}^+$. $\endgroup$ – MartianInvader Dec 21 '12 at 23:43
  • $\begingroup$ Two problems: $0 \notin \mathbb{N}^+$, and according to your definition, $0$ would map to the function $\phi$ defined by $\phi(n) = 1$ if $n$ is even, and $\phi(n) = 0$ if $n$ is odd. Then since $\phi(1) \neq 1$ (and in fact $\phi(x) \neq x$ for all $x$), this $\phi$ is not the identity of $\mathbb{N}^+$. $\endgroup$ – Shaun Ault Dec 21 '12 at 23:46
  • $\begingroup$ @ShaunAult Nevermind, this construction is clearly wrong, can you hint me on the right approach? Also surely $0 \in \mathbb{N}^{+}$ since it is the identity. $\endgroup$ – Herp Derpington Dec 21 '12 at 23:50
  • $\begingroup$ @ShaunAult If you're not including zero then $\mathbb{N}^+$ isn't a monoid... I think from context $\mathbb{N}^+$ is meant to be the nonnegative integers. $\endgroup$ – MartianInvader Dec 21 '12 at 23:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.