5
$\begingroup$

My question concerns the definition 1.3 page 2 of Brownian motion and stochastic calculus of Karatzas & Shreve.

Recall that a stochastic process is a collection of random variables (r.v.) $$ X = \{ X_t, t \in [0,\infty) \}. $$ Each of these r.v. is a measurable map from $(\Omega,\mathcal{F})$ (the sample space) to $(S,\mathcal{S})$ the state space.

Then the definition of indistinguishability between two stochastic processes $X$ and $Y$ defined on the same probability space $(\Omega,\mathcal{F}, \mathbb{P})$ is as follows: $X$ and $Y$ are indistinguishable if $$ \mathbb{P} (X_t = Y_t, \forall t \in [0,\infty) ) = 1. $$

I am confused by a measurability issue: Why $\cap_{t \geq 0} \{ X_t = Y_t \} \in \mathcal{F}$? (not countable intersection). I think it is implicitly assumed.

$\endgroup$
4
$\begingroup$

I think it is an excellent question and remark!

In practice, in the sequel, they will consider at least processes mesurables (Definition 1.6), that is $(t,\omega)\mapsto X_t(\omega)$ being mesurable : in this case the definition of indistinguishability has no such measurability issues.

But in the general case, to avoid that problem, we could easily add a condition such as :

There exists $A\in \mathcal{F}$ such that $A\subset \{X_t=Y_t, \ \forall t\geq 0\}$ and $P(A)=1$.

(Maybe that's what they had in mind?)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the clarification. $\endgroup$ – megaproba Feb 4 '18 at 3:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.