16
$\begingroup$

Anyone has an idea to prove the following inequality?

Let $g:\left(0,1\right)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ be twice differentiable and $r\in\left(0,1\right)$ such that $$ r\left(g"\left(x\right)+\dfrac{g'\left(x\right)}{x}\right)\geq\left(g'\left(x\right)\right)^{2},\forall x\in\left(0,1\right). $$ Prove that $$ \left(\intop_{0}^{1}e^{-g\left(x\right)}xdx\right)\left(\intop_{0}^{1}e^{g\left(x\right)}xdx\right)\leq\dfrac{1}{4\left(1-r\right)},\quad\quad {(\star)} $$ provided the LHS is finite.


Further comment: This inequality comes from a contest for undergraduate students in my university.

If we take the function $$ g\left(x\right)=-r\ln\left(-\ln\left(x\right)\right) $$ then we have $$ r\left(g"\left(x\right)+\dfrac{g'\left(x\right)}{x}\right)=\left(g'\left(x\right)\right)^{2},\forall x\in\left(0,1\right). $$ By using Mathematica, we can see that for this function $$ \left(\intop_{0}^{1}e^{-g\left(x\right)}xdx\right)\left(\intop_{0}^{1}e^{g\left(x\right)}xdx\right)=\dfrac{1}{4}\Gamma\left(1-r\right)\Gamma\left(1+r\right). $$ Moreover, we also can check that $$ \dfrac{1}{4}\Gamma\left(1-r\right)\Gamma\left(1+r\right)\leq\dfrac{1}{4\left(1-r\right)},\forall r\in\left(0,1\right). $$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ " the initial data"? I don't understand what you mean. $\endgroup$ – Binjiu Feb 4 '18 at 12:58
  • $\begingroup$ yes $g$ must be defined at 0 or 1 or somewhereelse. for instance what is the value of $g(0)=?$ $\endgroup$ – Guy Fsone Feb 4 '18 at 13:26
  • $\begingroup$ $g$ has a domain (0,1). We don't care g(0) or g(1). $\endgroup$ – Binjiu Feb 4 '18 at 13:34
  • $\begingroup$ I other word cant you solve and ODE without initial data? $\endgroup$ – Guy Fsone Feb 4 '18 at 13:43
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi Kevin, My rep. was subtracted automatically via the system once I offered this. Don't worry about that. If it's not enough, do you think that I am still able to make this offer? $\endgroup$ – Binjiu Feb 9 '18 at 10:14
7
$\begingroup$

This one is quite fun. Allow me to share some reasoning (not an answer yet!), which I believe might be helpful.

First, let's rewrite the ODE inequality in equivalent ways:

$$r\left(g''+\frac{g'}{x}\right)\geq g'^2$$

$$g''- \frac{g'^2}{r}+\frac{g'}{x} \geq 0$$

$$g''e^{-g/r}- \frac{g'^2}{r} e^{-g/r}+\frac{g'}{x} e^{-g/r} \geq 0 $$

Introducing a new function:

$$f(x)=e^{-g(x)/r}$$

We obtain an inequality:

$$x f''+f' \leq 0$$

Or (provided $f' > 0$ for $x \in (0,1)$):

$$( \ln f' )' \leq - \frac{1}{x}$$

Not sure how this might be useful yet, but we'll see.


Now we play with (*). Our inequality becomes:

$$\left( \int_0^1 f^r xdx \right) \left( \int_0^1 f^{-r} xdx \right) \leq \frac{1}{4(1-r)}$$

Changing the dummy variable in the second integral we have equivalent expression:

$$ \int_0^1 \int_0^1 f(x)^r f(y)^{-r} xy~dxdy \leq \frac{1}{4(1-r)}$$

Introducing:

$$u(x,y)=\ln f(x) - \ln f(y)$$

We have:

$$ \int_0^1 \int_0^1 e^{u(x,y)r} xy~dxdy \leq \frac{1}{4(1-r)}$$


Expand both sides as Taylor series in $r$ (since $ r \in (0,1)$ the geometric series converges):

$$\int_0^1 \int_0^1 \left(1+ur+\frac{u^2r^2}{2}+\dots+\frac{u^nr^n}{n!}+\dots \right) xy~dxdy \leq \frac{1}{4} \left(1+r+r^2+\dots +r^n+\dots \right)$$

While not necessary, it is sufficient if each term on the left is $\leq$ than each term on the right for respective powers of $r$. This might be used as proof, in case it turns out to follow from the ODE inequality. (This part is now obsolete, since this condition is indeed too strong, see Update 2 for further details).

First terms are equal:

$$\int_0^1 \int_0^1 x y dx dy=\frac{1}{4}$$

For the other terms we are supposed to somehow use the ODE inequality to show:

$$I_n=\int_0^1 \int_0^1 \left(\ln f(x)-\ln f(y) \right)^n x y ~dx dy \leq \frac{n!}{4} \tag{1}$$

Funny thing is, $r$ kind of disappeared from the problem statement (provided we can prove the inequality by term in the general case).


Update

Let's consider (1) when $n$ is odd. It is quite clear that:

$$I_{2k+1}=\int_0^1 \int_0^1 \left(\ln f(x)-\ln f(y) \right)^{2k+1} x y ~dx dy =0, \qquad k \in \mathbb{N}$$

Proof. Let's introduce a function $\ln f(x)=h(x)$:

$$I_{2k+1}=\int_0^1 \int_0^1 \left(h(x)-h(y) \right) \left(h(x)-h(y) \right)^{2k} x y ~dx dy =$$

$$=\int_0^1 \int_0^1 h(x) \left(h(x)-h(y) \right)^{2k} x y ~dx dy-\int_0^1 \int_0^1 h(y) \left(h(x)-h(y) \right)^{2k} x y ~dx dy$$

But both integrals are the same, since we can always change the dummy variable. Thus:

$$I_{2k+1}=I-I=0$$

Which means we only need to prove the even case of (1):

$$I_{2k}=\int_0^1 \int_0^1 \left(\ln f(x)-\ln f(y) \right)^{2k} x y ~dx dy \leq \frac{(2k)!}{4} \tag{2}$$

Which can be rewritten as:

$$\sum_{l=0}^{2k} \frac{(-1)^l}{(2k-l)!l!} \int_0^1 h(x)^{2k-l} x~dx \int_0^1 h(y)^l y ~ dy \leq \frac{1}{4}$$


Update 2

From a comment by Binjiu below, it is apparent that requrements $(1)$ and $(2)$ are too strong, and they are not true for the example from the OP (as could be checked directly for $k=1$).

I am still leaving that part of the post intact, as it shows which way we can't go.


Now the problem could be reformulated in another way (where we include the odd terms from the right hand side):

Prove that if for $f:\left(0,1\right)\rightarrow\mathbb{R}$ the inequality $x f''+f' \leq 0$ holds for all $x \in (0,1)$ then there exists $r \in (0,1)$ such that:

$$\int_0^1 \int_0^1 \left(\ln f(x)-\ln f(y) \right)^{2k} x y ~dx dy \leq \frac{(2k)!}{4} \left(1+r \right) \tag{3}$$

I believe this can be written without $r$ as just:

$$\int_0^1 \int_0^1 \left(\ln f(x)-\ln f(y) \right)^{2k} x y ~dx dy < \frac{(2k)!}{2}$$

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just a quick observation. Suppose that your idea works then in the end you indeed prove a stronger inequality, instead of $\frac{1}{4\left(1-r\right)}$, with the RHS $\frac{1}{4}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}r^{2k}=\frac{1}{4\left(1-r^{2}\right)}$. However, by the example that I gave, you can check that this bound is not the case. That is, the inequality (2) is not true. $\endgroup$ – Binjiu Feb 9 '18 at 13:10
  • $\begingroup$ @Binjiu, I have edited. Thank you for noticing this. I still think the reformulation of the problem (3) may be helpful. If you notice any more issues, I'd be happy to fix them $\endgroup$ – Yuriy S Feb 9 '18 at 14:36
5
+100
$\begingroup$

Let $f(x)=g(e^{-x})$, then $$r\left(g''(x)+\frac{g'(x)}{x}\right)\ge g'^2(x)\iff rf''\ge f'^2$$ and \begin{align} I&=\left( \int_0^1 e^{-g(x)} xdx \right) \left( \int_0^1 e^{g(x)} xdx \right)\\ &=\left( \int_0^{\infty} e^{-f(t)} e^{-2t}dt \right) \left( \int_0^{\infty} e^{f(t)} e^{-2t}dt \right)\tag{$x=e^{-t}$} \end{align} Let $h(x)=e^{-f(x/2)/r}$, then $$rf''\ge f'^2\iff h''\le0$$ and \begin{align} I&=\frac14\left( \int_0^{\infty} h(s)^r e^{-s}ds \right) \left( \int_0^{\infty} h(s)^{-r} e^{-s}ds \right)\tag{$s=2t$}\\ &=\frac14\int_0^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} \left(\frac{h(t)}{h(s)}\right)^r e^{-t}e^{-s}dtds \end{align} Now the problem becomes

Let $h:\Bbb R_+\to\Bbb R_+$ be a twice-differentiable and concave function, let $r\in(0,1)$, prove that$$J=\int_0^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} \left(\frac{h(t)}{h(s)}\right)^r e^{-t}e^{-s}dtds\le\frac1{1-r}$$

Let $s>0$, since $h$ is concave, we have $$\forall t>0,\ h(t)\le h'(s)(t-s)+h(s)$$ As $t\to0$, since $h$ is positive, we have $$h'(s)\le\frac{h(s)}{s}$$ Note that $h$ is positive and concave so is increasing, we have \begin{align} \forall t>0,\ \frac{h(t)}{h(s)}&\le\begin{cases} 1 & \text{if $t\le s$} \\ t/s & \text{if $t>s$} \end{cases}\\ &\le\frac{t}{s}+1 \end{align} Therefore, \begin{align} J&\le\int_0^{\infty}\int_0^{\infty} (s+t)^r s^{-r}e^{-t}e^{-s}dtds\\ &=\int_0^{\infty}\Gamma(r+1,s) s^{-r}ds\tag{1}\\ &=\frac{1}{1-r}\tag{2} \end{align} $(1):$ Incomplete Gamma function, $$\int_0^{\infty} (s+t)^r e^{-(s+t)}dt=\int_s^{\infty} u^r e^{-u}du\tag{$u=s+t$}$$ $(2):$ Integration by parts, \begin{align} \int_0^{\infty}\Gamma(r+1,s) s^{-r}ds&=\left[\frac{\Gamma(r+1,s) s^{1-r}}{1-r}\right]_0^{\infty}+\int_0^{\infty}s^re^{-s}\frac{s^{1-r}}{1-r}ds\\ &=0+\frac{\Gamma(2)}{1-r} \end{align}


Update:

As mentioned by @Binjiu, we can give a sharper bound by using directly: $$\forall s,t>0,\ \frac{h(t)}{h(s)}\le \begin{cases} 1 & \text{if $t\le s$} \\ t/s & \text{if $t>s$} \end{cases}$$ This yields \begin{align} J&\le\int_0^{\infty}\int_0^{s} e^{-t}e^{-s}dtds+\int_0^{\infty}\int_s^{\infty} t^r s^{-r}e^{-t}e^{-s}dtds\\ &=\frac{1}{2}+\int_0^{\infty}\gamma(1-r,t)t^{r}e^{-t}dt\tag{3}\\ &=1+r\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{n+1-r}\\ &=1+\frac{r}{2}\left(\psi\left(1-\frac r2\right)-\psi\left(\frac {1-r}2\right)\right)\tag{4} \end{align} $(3):$ Lower incomplete Gamma function, $$\gamma (1-r,t)=\int_0^ts^{-r}e^{-s}ds=-r\gamma (-r,t)-t^{-r}e^{-t}$$ $$\gamma (-r,t)=t^{-r}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^{n}t^{n}}{n!(n-r)}$$ $(4):$ Digamma function, $$\psi\left(\frac {z+1}2\right)-\psi\left(\frac {z}2\right)=2\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{n+z}$$ Below is the comparison of these two bounds. The maximum difference is $\ln2$ as $r\to1$. enter image description here

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ That's excellent. $\endgroup$ – Binjiu Feb 11 '18 at 2:10
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ By improving a bit of your method, $$ \dfrac{h\left(t\right)}{h\left(s\right)}\leq1\text{ if }t\leq s;\dfrac{h\left(t\right)}{h\left(s\right)}\leq\dfrac{t}{s}\text{ if }t\geq s, $$ we obtain the sharper estimate in the RHS $$ \dfrac{1}{4}+\dfrac{r}{8}\left(H\left(-\dfrac{r}{2}\right)-H\left(-\dfrac{r}{2}-\dfrac{1}{2}\right)\right). $$ Here $H$ is the "Harmonic Number". (The calculation is due to Mathematica.) $\endgroup$ – Binjiu Feb 11 '18 at 8:57
  • $\begingroup$ @Binjiu Thanks for your comments. I realized that but just thought it could be more "elegant" to get exactly $\frac1{1-r} $ :D $\endgroup$ – Aforest Feb 11 '18 at 11:49
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for this amazing solution. I learned quite a bit. +1 $\endgroup$ – Yuriy S Feb 11 '18 at 13:57
  • $\begingroup$ @YuriyS Thanks to your inspiring substitution $\endgroup$ – Aforest Feb 11 '18 at 17:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.