So I am to prove that, for a measure space $(\Omega,\mathcal{A},\mu)$ and sequences of extended real-valued measurable functions $f_n,g_n$ from $(\Omega,\mathcal{A})$ to the extended real line, such that \begin{equation}\label{1}\tag{1} \lim_{n\to\infty} f_n = f \text{ a.e.}, \quad \lim_{n\to\infty} g_n = g \text{ a.e.}, \quad \forall n \in \mathbb{N}: f_n = g_n \text{ a.e.}, \end{equation}

we have $f=g$ a.e..

As an attempt, I let \begin{equation} A := \{\omega\in\Omega : f(\omega) = g(\omega)\}, \end{equation}

such that for \begin{equation} A_n := \{\omega\in\Omega : g_n(\omega) = f_n(\omega)\}, \end{equation} \begin{equation} B_1 := \{\omega\in\Omega : lim_{n\to\infty} f_n(\omega) = f(\omega)\}, \end{equation} \begin{equation} B_2 := \{\omega\in\Omega : lim_{n\to\infty} g_n(\omega) = g(\omega)\}, \end{equation}

we have \begin{equation} \left(\bigcap_{n=1}^\infty A_n\right) \cap B_1 \cap B_2 \subset A, \end{equation}


\begin{equation} A^c \subset \left[\left(\bigcap_{n=1}^\infty A_n\right) \cap B_1 \cap B_2\right]^c = \left(\bigcup_{n=1}^\infty A_n^c\right) \cup B_1^c \cup B_2^c. \end{equation}

Now, by the subadditivity of measures, and by the assumptions \eqref{1}, $\mu(A^c) = 0$ since \begin{equation} 0 \leqslant \mu(A^c) \leqslant \sum_{n=1}^\infty \mu(A_n)^c + \mu(B_1^c) + \mu(B_2^c) = 0, \end{equation}

so it would follow that $f=g$ a.e.. However, since it is not given that $(\Omega,\mathcal{A},\mu)$ is a complete measure space, we do not know if $A^c\in\mathcal{A}$, so $\mu(A^c)$ may be undefined. Which approach would be appropriate? Thanks in advance!

  • $\begingroup$ In short: even if $A^c$ isn't measurable, it will be contained in some null set which is measurable, and so we treat it as a null set. In fact null-ness can be defined without reference to full-fledged Lebesgue measure theory, as is done in Jordan measure theory. $\endgroup$ – Ian Jan 28 '18 at 15:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ since $f_n\to f $ a.e and $g_n \to g$ a.e and $g_n, f_n$ are measurable functions it follows that the set $A=\{x\in X: f(x)=g(x)\}$ is measurable , so your proof can be complete! $\endgroup$ – dem0nakos Jan 28 '18 at 15:50
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Actually i am wrong the above statement that i told you works only if you have complete measure space . So i think Ian is right you have to go the complete measure space of $(\Omega,\mathcal{A},\mu)$ and find an $E \in \mathcal{A}$ such that $A\subset E$. $\endgroup$ – dem0nakos Jan 28 '18 at 16:01
  • $\begingroup$ But if I were to follow this advice, then I could only prove that $f=g$ a.e. with respect to the completion $\bar\mu$ of $\mu$. Can I assume this is equivalent? The question is not specific about which measure it should concern, so I assume it should be simply $\mu$. $\endgroup$ – User2935032946 Jan 31 '18 at 8:29

$B_1^c$ and $B_2^c$ and each $A_n^c$ is a null set so $D=B_1^c\cup B_2^c\cup (\cup_nA_n^c)$ is a null set, and $f(x)=g(x)$ for every $x\in D^c.$

It may be that $f(x)=g(x)$ for some $x\in D$ but that is moot. We do not want to show that the complement of $S=\{x:f(x)=g(x)\}$ is null. If the measure is incomplete then $S^c$ may be a non-measurable set. What we need is a null set $D\supset S^c$.

  • $\begingroup$ Isn't this exactly what I wrote after substitution S := A? $\endgroup$ – User2935032946 Jan 31 '18 at 8:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.