# Complex Analysis - Harmonic function as real part of holomorphic function [closed]

How would I prove the following?

If $\Omega$ is simply connected, in $\mathbb C$, and if $u$ is a harmonic function in $\Omega$ , prove that there exists a holomorphic function $f$ in $\Omega$ such that $Re(f) = u$.

## closed as off-topic by user296602, Claude Leibovici, kimchi lover, The Phenotype, Davide GiraudoFeb 6 '18 at 14:41

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

• "This question is missing context or other details: Please improve the question by providing additional context, which ideally includes your thoughts on the problem and any attempts you have made to solve it. This information helps others identify where you have difficulties and helps them write answers appropriate to your experience level." – Community, Claude Leibovici, kimchi lover, The Phenotype, Davide Giraudo
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

• Hint: simple-connectedness is sufficient... so using extreme details about rectangles or disks is not to the point... – paul garrett Jan 28 '18 at 0:44

## 1 Answer

We can find such a holomorphic function $f(z)$ as follows: since we know $u(z) = u(x, y)$, and it is harmonic, we may take its derivatives

$u_x(x, y) = \dfrac{\partial u(x, y)}{\partial x}, \; u_y(x, y) = \dfrac{\partial u(x, y)}{\partial y}; \tag 1$

consider the vector field

$V(x, y) = (V_x(x, y), V_y(x, y)) = (-u_y(x, y), u_x(x, y)); \tag 2$

we evaluate

$\nabla \times V(x, y) = \dfrac{\partial V_y(x, y)}{\partial x} - \dfrac{\partial V_x(x, y)}{\partial y} = \dfrac{\partial^2 u(x, y)}{\partial x^2} + \dfrac{\partial^2 u(x, y)}{\partial y^2} = 0, \tag 4$

since $u(x, y)$ is harmonic; since $\nabla \times V(x, y)$ vanishes, $V(x, y)$ is the gradient of some function $v(x, y)$ on $\Omega$:

$V(x, y) = \nabla v(x, y) = (v_x(x, y), v_y(x,y)); \tag 5$

we let $v(z) = v(x, y)$ be the imaginary part of $f(z)$:

$f(z) = f(x, y) = u(x, y) + i v(x, y); \tag 6$

by (2) and (5) we have

$(-u_y(x, y), u_x(x, y)) = V(x, y) = (v_x(x, y), v_y(x,y)); \tag 7$

that is,

$u_x(x, y) = v_y(x, y); \; u_y(x, y) = -v_x(x, y), \tag 8$

which are the Cauchy-Riemann equations for the function $f(z)$; thus $f(z)$ is holomorphic in $\Omega$, and it is evident that

$u(x, y) = \Re(f(x, y)); \; v(x, y) = \Im(f(x, y)), \tag 9$

as per request.

Note Added in Edit, Saturday 27 January 2018 6:12 PM PST: In fact, $v(x, y)$ may be explicitly presented as follows: let $z_0 = x_0 + i y_0 \in \Omega$ be fixed and $z = x + iy \in \Omega$ be arbitrary. Let $\gamma(t):[0, 1] \to \Omega$ be any differentiable path joining $(x_0, y_0)$ and $(x, y)$, i.e.,

$\gamma(0) = (x_0, y_0),\; \gamma(1) = (x, y); \tag{10}$

then we have

$v(x, y) - v(x_0, y_0) = \displaystyle \int_0^1 \dfrac{dv(\gamma(t))}{dt} = \int_0^1 \nabla v \cdot \gamma'(t) dt = \int_0^1 (-u_y, u_x) \cdot \gamma'(t) dt, \tag{11}$

which in principle allows us to compute $v(z) = v(x, y)$ for any $z \in \Omega$; $v(x_0, y_0)$ may be arbitrarily specified. End of Note.