Let $A,B\in \mathcal M_n(\mathbb{R})$, Prove $\det\begin{pmatrix} A & -B\\ B & A \end{pmatrix}=\bigg|\det(A+iB)\bigg|^2$

My work:

We know:


Here I'm stuck. Can someone help me?


marked as duplicate by anomaly, Cameron Williams, Adriano, The Phenotype, Guy Fsone Jan 28 '18 at 6:06

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • $\begingroup$ Let $A, B$ be 1x1 matrices. Then the left hand side is $A^2 + B^2$, while the right hand side is $(A+iB)^2$, which is not equal to left hand side. $\endgroup$ – xyzzyz Jan 27 '18 at 20:57
  • $\begingroup$ @xyzzyz: It's $|\det|^2$, not $\det^2$ itself. $\endgroup$ – anomaly Jan 27 '18 at 20:58
  • $\begingroup$ it makes no difference to my counterexample. it's probably rather what @Guy Fsone says. $\endgroup$ – xyzzyz Jan 27 '18 at 21:02
  • $\begingroup$ I think there is no need to have de module on the right hand side $\endgroup$ – Guy Fsone Jan 27 '18 at 21:05
  • $\begingroup$ @GuyFsone: The right side isn't even real without the absolute value. $\endgroup$ – anomaly Jan 27 '18 at 21:05

This follows directly from taking determinants of both sides of the following identity $$ \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 \\ i & 1\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix} A & -B \\ B & A\end{pmatrix}\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0 \\ -i & 1\end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix} A + iB & -B \\ 0 & A - iB\end{pmatrix} $$ and noting $\det (A + iB) $ and $\det(A-iB)$ are conjugates.

  • $\begingroup$ That requires computing the determinant of the block matrix on the far right (which behaves as described, by the OP might not have proved that yet.) $\endgroup$ – anomaly Jan 27 '18 at 23:56

Answer: For A and B commuting then we have $$\color{red}{\det \left(\begin{matrix} A& -B\\B&A \end{matrix}\right)= \bigg|\det(A+iB)\bigg|^2 }$$

Similarly like here For every $a \in \mathbb{R}$ evaluate $ \lim_{n \to \infty}\left(\begin{smallmatrix} 1&\frac{a}{n}\\\frac{-a}{n}&1\end{smallmatrix}\right)^{n}.$ by putting ourselves in the complex plan where we identify

$$ 1 \equiv \left(\begin{matrix} 1& 0\\0&1 \end{matrix}\right)~~~\text{and}~~~~ i \equiv \left(\begin{matrix} 0& -1\\1&0 \end{matrix}\right)\implies M=\left(\begin{matrix} A& -B\\B&A \end{matrix}\right)= A+iB$$ Now assume that $A$ is invertible (The case where A is not invertible will follows by density argument ): then from this

If A and B commute we obtain

$$\det \left(\begin{matrix} A& -B\\B&A \end{matrix}\right)=\det(A+BA^{-1}B)\det(A)= \det(A^2+BA^{-1}BA)=\det(A^2+B^2)$$

But we have, $$\color{red}{|A+iB|^2 =(A+iB)(A-iB)= A^2+B^2 }$$

And hence since $|z|^2=z\bar z$ we obtain , $$\det( A^2+B^2)=\det\left((A+iB)\cdot(A-iB)\right)=\det( A+iB)\cdot\det( A-iB) \\=\det( A+iB)\cdot\overline{\det( A+iB)}= \bigg|\det(A+iB)\bigg|^2$$

  • $\begingroup$ Why does $\det$ commute with the map you describe? $\endgroup$ – anomaly Jan 27 '18 at 21:02
  • $\begingroup$ I don't understand your point of view for this proof... If can explain a little more i can be very grateful. $\endgroup$ – Bvss12 Jan 27 '18 at 21:05
  • $\begingroup$ The exercise is fine don't have error. $\endgroup$ – Bvss12 Jan 27 '18 at 21:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Why is it necessary for $A$ and $B$ to commute? Do you have a counterexample? It follows in general just from the abstract nonsense of the map $M_n(\mathbb{C}) \to M_{2n}(\mathbb{R})$ induces on the action of $\mathbb{C}$ on itself by multiplication; the question is basically just showing that the determinant behaves as expected under a change of the ground field. $\endgroup$ – anomaly Jan 27 '18 at 21:37
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The OP's work is wrong. The problem as originally written, presumably from a linear algebra textbook, is correct. $\endgroup$ – anomaly Jan 27 '18 at 21:45

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.