0
$\begingroup$

On the page on Group Orbit of Wolfram MathWorld the following example is posted:

enter image description here

with the caption

For example, consider the action by the circle group $\mathbb S^1$ on the sphere $\mathbb S^2$ by rotations along its axis. Then the north pole is an orbit, as is the south pole. The equator is a one-dimensional orbit, as is a general orbit, corresponding to a line of latitude.

Is it possible to intuitively think of each color dot as a multiplicative cyclic group with a particular n-th roots of unity generator, $\langle \zeta=e^{\frac{2\pi}{n}i}\rangle,$ one at each latitude? Seemingly the angular distances are preserved between dots...

I am not clear as to whether each dot represents a different group, and I miss intuition as to the effect on the sphere as a set (are the elements of the set $\mathbb S^2$ the different latitudes?) being acted upon (by each dot? All at once?).

Adding interest to the topic, I wonder if it can be connected to the opening statement on the page:

In celestial mechanics, the fixed path a planet traces as it moves around the sun is called an orbit.

Can any parallelism be insinuated between this group action, its orbits, and a planetary system?

If possible, avoiding Lie groups would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

It is not clear to me what you are asking, but I will give it a try.

Each horizontal circle $h$ of the sphere $S^2$ is an orbit. What that means is that, for each $P\in h$, the set $\{\operatorname{rot}_\theta(P)\,|\,\theta\in[0,2\pi]\}$ is equal to $h$. Here, $\operatorname{rot}_\theta$ is the rotation of angle $\theta$ around the $z$-axis; more precisely, it is the map:$$(x,y,z)\mapsto\bigl(x\cos(\theta)+y\sin(\theta),-x\sin(\theta)+y\cos(\theta),z\bigr).$$The set of all these maps together with the composition of functions form a group, isomorphic to $S^1$.

Each horizontal circle is homeomorphic to $S^1$. However, in general, an orbit doesn't have to be homeomorphic to the group. And you have such a case here: the poles are orbits which are not homeomorphic to $S^1$.

So, no, the individual points are not cyclic groups. And no orbit is a cyclic group, or even a group, in general.

The parallelism between this situation and the orbits of planets around the sun is clear. This time, consider $\mathbb{R}^2$ and the action of $S^1$ there given by: if $\theta\in S^1$ and $(x,y)\in\mathbb{R}^2$, the action of $\theta$ on $(x,y)$ is given by$$\bigl(x\cos(\theta)+y\sin(\theta),-x\sin(\theta)+y\cos(\theta)\bigr).$$Then the orbit of each point other than $(0,0)$ is a circle. This is close to the orbits of the planets around the sun.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Lots of gaps (in my understanding). First off, not familiar with the circle group, but it seems clear now that it is not a cyclic group (as you indicate) - the circle group is not finite, and sounds more akin to modular addition of angles. The other idea that is difficult is the sphere $S^2$ as the "set acted on by $G.$" $\endgroup$ – Antoni Parellada Jan 12 '18 at 15:56
  • $\begingroup$ @mathkoan The action of an element $\theta\in S^1$ on $S^2$ is the action that I describe after the words “it is the map:” $\endgroup$ – José Carlos Santos Jan 12 '18 at 15:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.