1
$\begingroup$

I read the following statement:

Let $\mathcal L$ be a line bundle with $(\mathcal L.\mathcal L)>0$ on surface. If $(\mathcal L'.\mathcal L)=0$, then $(\mathcal L'.\mathcal L')\leq0$.

This looks very like the Hodge index theorem, except that the condition $\mathcal L$ being ample is weaken by $(\mathcal L.\mathcal L)>0$. I followed the proof of Hodge index theorem and I think the condition of ampleness is essential (I followed the Hartshorne's book, whose proof is based on Lemma 5.1.7, which I cannot see still holds true if ampleness is replaced by $(\mathcal L.\mathcal L)>0$).

So, how can I prove this statement? Is there any trick to avoid the ampleness in the proof?

Thanks in advance.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

Fix an ample divisor $H$, then $(\mathcal{L}\cdot H)\ne 0$. We may assume that $(\mathcal{L}'\cdot H)\ne 0$ otherwise it is clear. After taking a multiple, we may assume that $(\mathcal{L}\cdot H)=(\mathcal{L}'\cdot H)$. Hence $((\mathcal{L}-\mathcal{L}')\cdot H)=0$. This implies that $(\mathcal{L}-\mathcal{L}')^2\leq 0$ by HIT. Then it is easy to see that $(\mathcal{L}')^2<0$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.