1
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a finite group. For any $\mathbb{C}G$-module $W$ we define its $\textbf{Frobenius-Schur -ndicator}$ to be $$ \iota_W=\frac{1}{|G|}\sum_{g\in G}\chi_W(g^2), $$ where $\chi_W$ is the character of $W$.

My question is whether the following statement is true:

Statement

If $U$ is an irreducible $\mathbb{R}G$-module, then its character has one of the following forms:

  1. $\chi_U$, and $U$ is an irreducible $\mathbb{C}G$-module,
  2. $2\operatorname{Re}\chi_W$, for some irreducible $\mathbb{C}G$-module $W$.

Moreover, for any irreducible $\mathbb{C}G$ module $V$, one of the following is true:

  1. $\iota(V)=1$, then $V$ is an irreducible $\mathbb{R}G$-module,
  2. $\iota(V)\neq 1$, then $2\operatorname{Re}\chi_V$ is a character of some irreducible $\mathbb{R}G$-module.
$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

We can define the inner product

$$\langle \chi_1, \chi_2 \rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g \in G} \overline{\chi_1}(g) \chi_2(g)$$

of characters for representations over $\mathbb{R}$ in the same way as over $\mathbb{C}$ (of course here we have $\overline{\chi} = \chi$). It is still true that

$$\langle \chi_V, \chi_W \rangle = \dim \text{Hom}_G(V, W)$$

but the computation of $\text{Hom}_G(V, W)$ is slightly more complicated. We still have that nonisomorphic irreducibles are orthogonal, but if $V$ is irreducible then

$$\langle \chi_V, \chi_V \rangle = \dim \text{End}_G(V)$$

can take one of three possible values, corresponding to the three finite-dimensional real division algebras over $\mathbb{R}$ (Schur's lemma guarantees that $\text{End}_G(V)$ is a division algebra):

  1. If $\text{End}_G(V) \cong \mathbb{R}$ then $\langle \chi_V, \chi_V \rangle = 1$.
  2. If $\text{End}_G(V) \cong \mathbb{C}$ then $\langle \chi_V, \chi_V \rangle = 2$.
  3. If $\text{End}_G(V) \cong \mathbb{H}$ then $\langle \chi_V, \chi_V \rangle = 4$.

Now, if $V$ is an irreducible real representation, consider the complexification $V \otimes \mathbb{C}$. It has the same character as $V$, and hence $\langle \chi_V, \chi_V \rangle$ takes the same values.

  1. If $\langle \chi_V, \chi_V \rangle = 1$ then $V \otimes \mathbb{C}$ is irreducible.
  2. If $\langle \chi_V, \chi_V \rangle = 2$ then $V \otimes \mathbb{C}$ is the direct sum of two nonisomorphic irreducibles, whose characters must be complex conjugates of each other. These are given by $V$ together with the action of $\text{End}_G(V) \cong \mathbb{C}$, where there are two ways of identifying $\text{End}_G(V)$ with $\mathbb{C}$ related by complex conjugation.
  3. If $\langle \chi_V, \chi_V \rangle = 4$ then $V \otimes \mathbb{C}$ is the direct sum of two isomorphic irreducibles, whose character must be real. These are given by $V$ together with the action of any copy of $\mathbb{C}$ inside $\text{End}_G(V) \cong \mathbb{H}$.

(This does not quite follow from a dimension count but it does follow from the identity $\text{End}_G(V \otimes \mathbb{C}) \cong \text{End}_G(V) \otimes \mathbb{C}$.)

This gives your first statement. The second statement is also true (each of the three cases above corresponds to a possible value of the Frobenius-Schur indicator) but the proof escapes me for the moment.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.