In this thread, I formulated a conjecture about the non-existence of a metric $\rho$ on $\mathbb R^{\infty}$ in such a way that for any $(x_1,x_2,x_3,\ldots)\in\mathbb R^{\infty}$, the restriction of $\rho$ to subspaces of the form \begin{align*} &\;\mathbb R\times\{x_2\}\times\{x_3\}\times\cdots,\\ &\;\{x_1\}\times\mathbb R\times\{x_3\}\times\cdots,\\ &\;\{x_1\}\times\{x_2\}\times\mathbb R\times\cdots, \end{align*} and so forth, essentially coincides with the absolute-value metric.
In that thread, @mechanodroid refuted this conjecture, ingenuously demonstrating that such a metric does exist on $\mathbb R^{\infty}$.
In the current thread, I am asking input toward establishing that the existence result in that other thread is more like the exception than the norm—that is, non-existence persists in general infinite product spaces.
I am looking for a counterexample such that
- for each $n\in\mathbb N$, $(X_n,d_n)$ is a (non-empty) metric space;
- there exists no metric $\rho$ on the product space $X\equiv \prod_{n\in\mathbb N} X_n$ with the following property: if $x,y\in X$ is such that there exists an $i\in\mathbb N$ such that $x_j=y_j$ for all $j\in\mathbb N\setminus\{i\}$, then $\rho(x,y)=d_i(x_i,y_i)$.
Intuitively, this means that general infinite product spaces may not be metrized in such a manner that the “marginal metric” coincides with the respective original metric on each factor space.
Many thanks in advance for any kind of contribution.