I'm interested in the following limit: $$ L = \lim_{N \to \infty} \sum_{a_1 = 1}^\infty \sum_{a_2 = 1}^\infty \cdots \sum_{a_N = 1}^\infty \frac{1}{a_1^2 \, a_2 ^3 \cdots a_N^{N+1}}$$ It can be rewritten as $$ L = \lim_{N \to \infty} \prod_{n = 2}^{N} \zeta (n).$$ or taking log of both sides $$ \ln L = \lim_{N \to \infty} \sum_{n = 2}^{N} \ln \zeta (n). \tag{1}$$ For a long time I couldn't prove/disprove the convergence of $(1)$. First thing to note is that the partial sums are monotonically increasing. My original idea was to prove the upper bound $$ n^2 \,(\zeta(n)-1) < C < \infty \,\,, \forall n \geq 2 \tag{2}$$ Then by some Taylor series manipulation the proof would be done. Question:

$\star$ How could $(2)$ be proven? Mathematica gives that the product $(2)$ should go to zero, but how to prove it mathematically?

$\star$ Or maybe there is a more elegant way to test convergence of $(1)$?

  • $\begingroup$ $1<\zeta(s)<1/(1-2^{1-s})$ for $s>1$, so $$\sum_{n=2}^\infty\ln\zeta(n)>-\sum_{n=2}^\infty\ln(1-2^{1-s})$$and it is easy to check for convergence from here. $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Dec 30 '17 at 15:26
  • $\begingroup$ You meant: $\ln \zeta(n) < -\ln(1 - 2^{1 - n})$, I think? $\endgroup$ – Raito Dec 30 '17 at 15:32
  • $\begingroup$ @Raito Oops, you are right. Though it's too late to edit. $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Dec 30 '17 at 15:33
  • $\begingroup$ The product definitely does not go to zero. Trivially,$$\prod_{n=2}^N\zeta(n)\ge\zeta(2)$$Since every term in the product is greater than $1$. $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Dec 30 '17 at 15:40
  • $\begingroup$ I meant the product of $n^2$ and $\zeta(n)-1$ which I want to bound. $\endgroup$ – DrLRX Dec 30 '17 at 15:49

As an alternative way, notice that for $s \geq 2$ we have

$$ 1 \leq \zeta(s) \leq 1 + \frac{1}{2^s} + \int_{2}^{\infty} \frac{dx}{x^s} \leq 1 + \frac{3}{2^s}. $$

So it follows that

$$ \sum_{s=2}^{\infty} \log \zeta(s) \leq \sum_{s=2}^{\infty} \frac{3}{2^s} < \infty $$

and hence the sum converges by the comparison test. Exponentiating shows that the product also converges.

  • $\begingroup$ I accepted this answer because it doesn't use fancy zeta function identities to prove it. Thank you! :) $\endgroup$ – DrLRX Dec 30 '17 at 19:28

We have the following relationship between the Riemann zeta and the Dirichlet eta functions:




Thus, for $s>1$, we have


and trivially $1<\zeta(s)$.

For any $1<x<y$, we also have $\ln(x)<\ln(y)$, and so


which converges by the ratio test.

  • $\begingroup$ We have $\frac{1}{2}<\eta(s)<1$ for $s>0$. $\endgroup$ – Wojowu Dec 30 '17 at 15:43
  • $\begingroup$ Many typos! x.x luckily they're just typos I think. $\endgroup$ – Simply Beautiful Art Dec 30 '17 at 15:46

Given the prime zeta function $P(s)=\sum_{p}\frac{1}{p^s}$ we have $$\log\zeta(s)=\sum_{n\geq 1}\frac{1}{n}P(ns) = \sum_{n\geq 1}\sum_{p}\frac{1}{n p^{ns}} $$ hence $$ \sum_{s\geq 2}\log\zeta(s) =\sum_{n\geq 1}\sum_p \frac{1}{np^n(p^n-1)}$$ and $$ \prod_{s\geq 2}\zeta(s) = \exp\sum_{n\geq 1}\sum_p \frac{1}{np^n(p^n-1)}$$ is clearly convergent.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.