Proposition 5.38 of the book Cyclotomic Fields by Lawrence Washington is as follows:

Let $m\geq 1$ be square free and assume 3 does not split completely in $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-m})$. If 3 divides the class number of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3m})$ then 3 divides the class number of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-m})$.

The proof uses the 3-adic class number formula and the congruence of integer values of 3-adic L-functions to get $$\big(1-\frac{\chi\omega(3)}{3}\big)\frac{2h\log_3{\epsilon}}{\sqrt{D}}\equiv-(1-\chi(3))B_{1,\chi}\mod 3.$$ Here $\chi$ is the character for $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-m})$, $\chi\omega$ is the character for $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3m})$, $\epsilon,h,D$ are the fundamental unit, class number, and discriminant for $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3m})$.

Then he checks that the left hand side is $h$ times something integral and therefore that if $3|h$, $3|-B_{1,\chi}=h(\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-m}))$. This last step uses that 3 isn't split so that $1-\chi(3)\neq 0$.

Working through the proof, I don't see where any special properties of 3 are used besides it being prime. Am I missing something, or is it true for any prime $p$ in place of 3 with the exact same proof?


You're missing the fact that the cubic unramified extension becomes a Kummer extension over the field you get by adjoining $\sqrt{-3}$, which fails to hold for primes $p > 3$.

  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much for this, it (and your answer here mathoverflow.net/a/75027) have helped me understand why 3 is needed for this theorem. The proof you give is different from Washington's, he uses $p$-adic $L$-functions. I edited my post to sketch his proof. Do you know if your proof can be rephrased in this language? Or where his proof might break down for $p\neq 3$? $\endgroup$ – Peter Dec 28 '17 at 3:02
  • $\begingroup$ I think I see how this affects Washington's proof now. The class number of $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-m})$ is $-B_{1,\chi}$ where $\chi$ is the Dirichlet character corresponding to $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-m})$. We can understand $B_{1,\chi}\mod 3$ via the 3-adic $L$-function corresponding to $\chi\omega$, and because $\mathbb{Q}(\zeta_3)$ is quadratic the character $\chi\omega$ corresponds to the quadratic field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{3m})$ to which we can then apply the $3$-adic class number formula. For any larger prime, $\chi\omega$ will come from some more complicated field, so things will be messier. $\endgroup$ – Peter Dec 29 '17 at 23:59

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.