I have to find: $$\lim_{x\to0}{\frac{\ln(1+e^x)-\ln2}{x}}$$ and I want to calculate it without using L'Hospital's rule. With L'Hospital's I know that it gives $1/2$. Any ideas?
-
$\begingroup$ maybe try Taylor series? $\endgroup$– E-ADec 21, 2017 at 16:23
-
7$\begingroup$ Something that is missing from all the answers pointing out this is a derivative at $0$, i.e. you are computing $$\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{f(x)-f(0)}{x}$$ for some function $f$: this shows you shouldn't (even cannot) use L'Hopital for that. Why? L'Hopital's rule amounts to saying "compute the derivatives of (i) $g(x) = f(x) - f(0)$ and (ii) $h(x) = x$ on a neighborhood of $0$, and then evaluate $\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{g'(x)}{h'(x)} = \lim_{x\to 0}\frac{f'(x)}{1} $. $\endgroup$– Clement C.Dec 21, 2017 at 16:43
-
5$\begingroup$ But you want to compute... $f'(0)$ in the first place, so using L'Hopital is circular (on top of being overkill): it asks to compute $f'(x)$ in order to compute $f'(0)$. $\endgroup$– Clement C.Dec 21, 2017 at 16:43
8 Answers
I thought it might be instructive to present an approach that does not rely on differential calculus, but rather uses the squeeze theorem and a set of inequalities that can be obtained with pre-calculus tools only. To that end we proceed.
First note that in THIS ANSWER, I showed using only the limit definition of the exponential function along with Bernoulli's Inequality that the logarithm and exponential functions satisfy the inequalities
$$\frac{x-1}{x}\le \log(x)\le x-1\tag 1$$
and for $x<1$
$$1+x\le e^x\le \frac{1}{1-x}\tag2$$
Next, note that $\log(1+e^x)-\log(2)=\log\left(\frac{e^x+1}2\right)$. Hence, applying $(1)$, we can assert that
$$\frac{e^x -1}{e^x +1}\le \log(1+e^x)-\log(2)\le \frac{e^x-1}2\tag3$$
Then, applying $(2)$ to $(3)$ reveals
$$\frac{x}{e^x +1}\le \log(1+e^x)-\log(2)\le \frac{x}{2(1-x)}\tag4$$
Dividing $(4)$ by $x$, letting $x\to 0$, and applying the squeeze theorem yields the coveted limit
$$\bbox[5px,border:2px solid #C0A000]{\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{\log(1+e^x)-\log(2)}{x}=\frac12}$$
Tools Used: The inequalities in $(1)$ and $(2)$ and the squeeze theorem.
-
$\begingroup$ can (1) or (2) be proved without differential calculus? $\endgroup$– daulombDec 21, 2017 at 16:57
-
$\begingroup$ @daulomb Indeed. I provided a link in the solution. Did you not see it? If not, HERE IT IS. $\endgroup$ Dec 21, 2017 at 17:00
-
$\begingroup$ I could not open the link but as I know the proof of Bernoulli's inequality also requires differentiation. Am I wrong? Neverthless your solution is very nice! $\endgroup$– daulombDec 21, 2017 at 17:03
-
$\begingroup$ @daulomb Bernoulli's inequality can also be proved by induction; I agree teh solution is nice but is not simpler than others method $\endgroup$– userDec 21, 2017 at 17:08
-
1$\begingroup$ @daulomb And with Bernoulli's Inequality and the limit definition of the exponential function, one can prove the inequalities in $(1)$ and $(2)$. HERE is the link one more time. $\endgroup$ Dec 21, 2017 at 17:51
Simply differentiate $f(x)=\ln(e^x +1)$ at the point of abscissa $x=0$ and you’ll get the answer. in fact this is the definition of the derivative of $f$!!
Let $y = e^x$
$$L = \lim_{x\to0}{\frac{\ln(1+e^x)-\ln2}{x}} = \lim_{y\to1}{\frac{\ln(1+y)-\ln2}{\ln y}}$$
Let $z = y -1$
$$L = \lim_{z\to0}{\frac{\ln(z + 2)-\ln2}{\ln(z+1)}} = \dfrac12\lim_{z\to0}\frac{\ln(z/2 + 1)}{z/2}\dfrac{z}{\ln(z+1)}= \dfrac12$$
-
$\begingroup$ yes I've seen also that now :) +1 for similar solution $\endgroup$– userDec 21, 2017 at 18:59
This is just the derivative of $\ln\left(\frac{e^x+1}2\right)$ at $0$, which is indeed $\frac12$.
-
3$\begingroup$ Why the extra factor $2$? It is simpler to see it as the derivative of $\ln(1+e^x)$, without the additional division by $2$ (which, given it's inside the logarithm, is an additive term anyway). $\endgroup$ Dec 21, 2017 at 16:29
-
1$\begingroup$ @ClementC. Thats because in order to check that it was indeed an indeterminate form, the first thing I did was the transformation $\ln(e^x+1)-\ln2=\ln\left(\frac{e^x+1}2\right)$. But, yes, there is no need no do that. $\endgroup$ Dec 21, 2017 at 16:33
That's just the derivative of $\ln\left(e^x+1\right)$ at $0$.
If you don't see it, by Taylor's series:
$${\frac{\ln(1+e^x)-\ln2}{x}}={\frac{\ln(2+x+o(x))-\ln2}{x}}=\frac{\ln(1+\frac{x}{2}+o(x))}{x}=\frac{\frac{x}{2}+o(x)}{x}=\frac12+o(1)\to\frac12$$
Solution by standard limits:
set $$1+e^x=2+y \quad y\to 0\implies e^x=1+y \implies x= \ln (1+y)$$
thus
$${\frac{\ln(1+e^x)-\ln2}{x}}=\frac{\ln (2+y)-\ln 2}{\ln(1+y)}=\frac{\ln (1+\frac{y}{2})}{\ln(1+y)}=\frac{\ln (1+\frac{y}{2})}{\frac y2}\frac{y}{\ln (1+y)}\frac12\to 1\cdot 1\cdot \frac12=\frac12$$
-
-
-
$\begingroup$ @123 I've seen it now! Anyway it's slightly different and I think you have to add an $\frac12$ term at the end! $\endgroup$– userDec 21, 2017 at 18:55
There's an amusing way to prove, if the limit exists, it must be $1/2.$ Obviously, not a complete answer, since it doesn't prove the limit exists.)
Letting $f(x)=\log(1+e^x)$ then we have $f(x)=\log(1+e^{x})=\log(e^x)+\log(1+e^{-x})=x+f(-x)$ and thus $f(x)-f(-x)=x.$
So if $L=\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{f(x)-f(0)}{x}$ then $$1=\lim_{x\to 0} \frac{f(x)-f(-x)}{x}=\lim_{x\to 0}\left[\frac{f(x)-f(0)}{x}+\frac{f(-x)-f(0)}{-x}\right]=2L$$
And thus we get $L=\frac{1}{2}$.
A more complete answer uses that we know that:
$$\lim_{y\to 0}\frac{\log(1+y)}{y}=1.$$
Then we can write:
$$\frac{\log(1+e^x)-\log2}{x}=\frac{\log\left(1+\frac{e^x-1}{2}\right)}{\frac{e^x-1}{2}}\cdot \frac{\frac{e^x-1}{2}}{x}$$
Letting $y=\frac{e^x-1}{2}$, we get that $y\to 0$ as $x\to 0$ and $x=\log(1+2y)$ so we get:
$$\lim_{x\to 0}\frac{\log(1+e^x)-\log2}{x}=\lim_{y\to 0}\frac{\log(1+y)}{y}\cdot \frac{2y}{\log(2y+1)}\cdot \frac{1}{2}=1\cdot 1\cdot\frac{1}{2}$$
This is really just a long way of proving the chain rule for the derivative of $\log(e^x+1).$
[Complete answer updated to use the neat trick of gimusi at the end, rather than using $\frac{e^x-1}{x}\to 1$ as well.]
-
$\begingroup$ Nice the second is similar to mine by standard limits, +1 for the first! $\endgroup$– userDec 21, 2017 at 18:07
-
$\begingroup$ I had a slightly more complicated answer for the complete answer, but I added a simplication based roughly on your answer. I was still using $y=\frac{e^x-1}{2}$ all along, I just assumed $\frac{e^x-1}{x}\to 1$ also. So I updated with a rough assist from your answer. Edited to reflect your help. $\endgroup$ Dec 21, 2017 at 18:10
As pointed out by one of the replies on the question, you can notice that $$ \lim_{x\to 0} \frac {ln(1+e^x)-ln2}{x} $$ is written in the format of one of the theoretical definition of derivative at point x : $$ \lim_{h\to 0} \frac {f(x+h) - f(x)}{x} $$ Therefore, x can be evaluated to 0 and $ f(x) = ln(1+e^x)$ Using this function, calculate its derivative which is $$ f'(x) = \frac {1}{1+e^x} (e^x) $$ Then you plug $ x=0 $ to get the answer $$ f'(1) = \frac{e^0}{1+e^0} = \frac{1}{2} $$