I've read the definition a few times and I am still struggling to understand what these actually mean. As I understand it, a sequence of functions is pointwise bounded if there exists an $M$ for each $x$ such that $f_n(x)<M$, for all $n$, and a function is uniformly bounded if there exists an $M$ such that $f_n(x) < M$ for every $n, x$. This leads to two questions that I have. Firstly, would pointwise convergence imply pointwise boundedness and would uniform convergence imply uniform boundedness? Also are there a few examples that demonstrate some pointwise/uniformly bounded sequences of functions(non trivial, i.e not a constant sequence), particularly perhaps one that is pointwise but not uniformly bounded and why that is the case


Yes it is true that pointwise convergence implies pointwise bounded. A proof is similar to a proof that the convergent sequence of numbers $f_i(x)$ in the index $i$ is bounded for a fixed $x$, except you apply the $\forall x$ quantifier.

No uniform convergence does not imply uniform boundedness. Take $f_i(x)=x^2+1/i$, they converge to $f(x)=x^2$ uniformly, which is not a uniformly bounded function.

The sequence $f_i$ above is pointwise bounded but not uniformly bounded. Given $x$, a bound for the sequence of numbers $f_i(x)$ is $x^2+1$. It is not uniformly bounded because not even any single $f_i$ is bounded.

  • $\begingroup$ Your sequence converges to $x^2$ $\endgroup$
    – GTOgod
    Dec 17 '17 at 9:49
  • $\begingroup$ yes oops I saw it and fixed it, thanks for the catch $\endgroup$ Dec 17 '17 at 9:49

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.