Setup: I would like to use Cauchy's 1-line notation for permutations to express the following kind of sum more compactly:

\begin{align} C_{1,2} C_{3,4}+C_{1,3}C_{2,4}+C_{1,4}C_{2,3}, \tag{*}\label{*} \end{align} where $C_{i,j}$ are some indexed coefficients. i.e., all the perumutations of $C_{i,j}C_{k,l}$ for $i,j,k,l=1,2,3,4$ with $i<j$, $k<l$, and $i<k$.

Example: If my sum had instead been over products like $C_{i,j}D_{k,l}$ with permutations of $i,j,k,l=1,2,3,4$ with no ordering restriction, then I could compactly write,

\begin{align} \sum_\sigma C_{\sigma(1),\sigma(2)}D_{\sigma(3),\sigma(4)}, \end{align} where $\sigma$ denotes the permutations of $1,2,3,4$.

Question: To generate \eqref{*}, I need to take into account the fact that $C_{i,j}C_{k,l}=C_{k,l}C_{i,j}$ and implement the ordering restriction. Is there a compact way to achieve this using Cauchy's 1-line notation (and perhaps other "standard" combinatoric notation/conventions)?

  • $\begingroup$ Could you maybe explain what $C_{i,j}$ is exactly? $\endgroup$ – Benji Altman Dec 17 '17 at 1:37
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps they could be Plucker coordinates in a quadratic relation $\endgroup$ – Somos Dec 17 '17 at 2:56

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.