Good evening,

In the paper "Asymptotic analysis of the linearized Navier-Stokes equations in a channel" (Differential Integral Equations 8, No. 7(1995), 1591-1618) the authors define a cut-off function as follows:

$\rho \in C^{\infty}\left[0, \infty\right), \rho(0) = 1, \text{supp}\space \rho \subset \left[0,1/2\right]$

$\rho^{\eta}\left(y\right) = \rho\left(y/\eta^{1/2}\right), \space y \geq 0 $

$\widetilde{\rho}^\eta = \rho^\eta(y) + \rho^\eta(1-y), \space 0 \leq y \leq 1$

They state some straightforward estimates in the following in the $L^p$ Norm. Afterwards, however, they postulate an estimate in the $H^{-1}$ Norm for $\eta < 1$:

$\left|\widetilde{\rho}^\eta\right|_{H^{-1}\left(0,1\right)} \leq 2 \eta^{3/4} \left|\rho\right|_{L^2\left(\Omega\right)}$

I am not an expert in functional analysis, but isnt $H^{-1}$ the dual space of $H^1_0$? So why does that statement even make sense? The cut-off function is a function and not a functional. So how is the pairing defined? Do they mean the $L^2$ scalar product in that case? If yes, I still dont know how they arrive at that estimate since I only get $\eta^{1/4}$ by using Cauchy-Schwartz and an integral transformation.

Thank you for your help!


I don't have access to the paper, and I'm not quite confident about I'm to write, but I hope it could help you. I think that the pairing you're referring to is $v\mapsto \int uv\,dt$, for $v\in H^1_0$, where $u$ is a function, in this case $u=\tilde{\rho}^\eta$, or for simplicity we can take $u=\rho^\eta$.

Suppose $v$ is smooth, since a limiting argument prove the general statement. Since $v$ is compactly supported in $(0,1)$ we have

$\int \rho^\eta v\,dt = -\int(\int_t^1\rho(\frac{x}{\eta^{1/2}})\,dx)'v\,dt=\int(\int_t^1\rho(\frac{x}{\eta^{1/2}})\,dx)v'\,dt\le \lVert \int_t^1\rho(\frac{x}{\eta^{1/2}})\,dx\rVert_2\lVert v\rVert_{H_0^1}$.

The $L^2$-norm of $\int_t^1\rho(\frac{x}{\eta^{1/2}})\,dx$, which equals $\eta^{1/2}\int_{t/\eta^{1/2}}^1 \rho(x)\,dx$ for $t<\eta^{1/2}$ and zero otherwise, is

$\eta^{1/2}\Big[\int_0^{\eta^{1/2}}(\int_{t/\eta^{1/2}}^1 \rho(x)\,dx)^2\,dt\Big]^{1/2}=\eta^{3/4}\Big[\int_0^1(\int_t^1 \rho(x)\,dx)^2\,dt\Big]^{1/2}\le \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\eta^{3/4}\lVert\rho\rVert_2$.

The other side of $\tilde{\rho}^\eta$ is treated similarly. The term $1/\sqrt{2}$ is superfluous, the autor drops it from the inequality.

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for your answer! Just to clarify: Since the cut-off function is just a special case of a L2 function, i can always identify it's functional via Riesz-Fischer by the L2 scalar product? Could you elaborate a bit on your last estimate? By using Cauchy-Schwartz, setting t=0 in the inner integral and integrating in the outer from 0 to 1/2 (since the inner integral is 0 for t>1/2), the best estimate i can get is or order $\left\Vert \rho \right\Vert_{L^2}^2$ $\endgroup$ – Stefan Litzel Dec 18 '17 at 14:25
  • $\begingroup$ As you mentioned, there is still room for improvements of the constant, but it seems that it doesn't matter for the purposes of the article. In the very last part I did: $\int_0^1(\int_t^1\rho\,dx)^2\,dt\le |\rho|_2^2\int_0^1\int_t^1\,dxdt= \frac{1}{2}|\rho|_2^2$. Concerning your first question, $v\mapsto\int uv$ is the definition of the functional attached to $u$, it doesn't come from Riesz-Thorin. Even a function $u\in L^1$ defines an element in $H^{-1}$ with this pairing. $\endgroup$ – user90189 Dec 19 '17 at 16:20
  • $\begingroup$ Other way you can get this kind of estimates is by Fourier transform. Notice that $|\int u\bar{v}|=|\sum \hat{u}(n)\hat{\bar{v}}(n)|=|\sum \hat{u}(1+|n|^2)^{-1/2}(1+|n|^2)^{1/2}\hat{\bar{v}}|\le\Big( \sum |\hat{u}|^2(1+|n|^2)^{-1}\Big)^{1/2}\Big(\sum|\hat{v}|^2 (1+|n|^2)\Big)^{1/2}\le \Big( \sum |\hat{u}|^2(1+|n|^2)^{-1}\Big)^{1/2}|v|_{H_0^1}$. $\endgroup$ – user90189 Dec 19 '17 at 16:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.