0
$\begingroup$

Prove $\operatorname{cf}(\alpha)\leq|\alpha|$ if $\alpha$ is a limit ordinal.

I know every surjection onto α has range unbounded in $α$, but I'm stuck on how to formalize this argument.Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • 5
    $\begingroup$ Please don't delete your question if it has received an answer. $\endgroup$ – Asaf Karagila Dec 13 '17 at 12:46
5
$\begingroup$

This is easier if you prove that the cofinality is always a cardinal.

And it seems you have the tools for that. Let me outline the steps:

  1. $\operatorname{cf}(\operatorname{cf}(\alpha)) = \operatorname{cf}(\alpha)$. This one is easy.

  2. If $\alpha=\operatorname{cf}(\alpha)$, then $\alpha$ is a cardinal. Otherwise, take $f\colon|\alpha|\to\alpha$ to be some bijection, then it has an unbounded range. Depending on how you define cofinality in the first place this might give you a direct contradiction or require you to distill a strictly increasing function. But in either case, you're done.

  3. $|\alpha|$ is the largest cardinal which is $\leq\alpha$.

Combine these and you should be fine.

$\endgroup$
3
$\begingroup$

For a limit ordinal, $\alpha$, the cofinalty is the smallest ordinal $\delta$ such that there is a $\delta$-indexed increasing sequence whose limit is $\alpha$. There is an $\alpha$-indexed sequence whose limit is $\alpha$ because you can just take the sequence that lists every ordinal less than $\alpha$ in increasing order. Since $\alpha$ satisfies the rule and $cf(\alpha)$ is the smallest ordinal that satisfies the rule, we get that $cf(\alpha)\leq|\alpha|$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ But you haven't argued the key issue: that $\operatorname{cf}(\alpha)$ is a cardinal. As written, all the argument tells us is that $\operatorname{cf}(\alpha)\le\alpha$. $\endgroup$ – Andrés E. Caicedo Dec 13 '17 at 12:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.