I need help regarding a question that came up connected to an exercise (I.19 on page 75 in Sheaves on Manifolds by Kashiwara and Schapira) I am currently working on.

Given a left-exact functor $F: \mathcal{A}\rightarrow\mathcal{B}$ between abelian categories, suppose its derived functor $RF$ exists. Then the full subcategory $\mathcal{J}$ of $F$-acyclic objects (i.e. those with $R^k F(X)=0$ for $k\neq 0$) forms an $F$-injective subcategory, hence we can compute $RF$ on complexes in $\mathcal{J}$.

Suppose now $F$ has cohomological dimension $n$. I want to show that, given an exact sequence $$0\rightarrow X_0\rightarrow \cdots \rightarrow X_n\rightarrow 0$$ in $\mathcal{A}$ with $X_i\in \mathcal{J}$ for $i<n$, then $X_n$ is in $\mathcal{J}$ as well.

I came up with a solution that does not seem right to me, but I cannot find out where I'm wrong:

Since $\mathcal{J}$ is $F$-injective, the sequence $0\rightarrow X_0\rightarrow\cdots\rightarrow X_n\rightarrow 0$ defines an $F$-injective resolution for $X_n$, i.e. a quasi-isomorphism $X_\ast \rightarrow X_n$ in $K^+(\mathcal{A})$ where $$X_{\ast} =[ \cdots\rightarrow 0\rightarrow X_0\rightarrow\cdots\rightarrow X_{n-1}\rightarrow 0\rightarrow \cdots ]$$

(here $X_{n-1}$ is at position $0$). Now $R^kF(X_n)=R^kF(X_\ast)=H^kF(X)=0$ for $k>0$, hence $X_n$ is $F$-acyclic as $R^kF(X_n)=0$ for $k<0$ is always true in this case.

My problem is that I did not even use the fact that $F$ has finite cohomological dimension, so I don't think my argument is right.

(Note that in the book, the above sequence is not assumed to be exact on the left, however in class the situation was presented like I wrote it down. The context is the proof of the Poincaré-Verdier duality.)


I don't see any mistakes in your proof. In fact, here is another one which does not use hyperderived functors (so without the fact that $R^kF(X_*)=H^kF(X_*)$ for a complex of acyclic objects) :

Claim : If $X_0\subset X_1$ are $F$-acyclic, then so is $X_1/X_0$. This follows from the long exact sequence associated to the short exact sequence $0\rightarrow X_0\rightarrow X_1\rightarrow X_1/X_0\rightarrow 0$.

Now, in your situation : $0\rightarrow X_0\rightarrow X_1\rightarrow ...\rightarrow X_{n-1}\rightarrow X_n\rightarrow 0$, if every $X_i$ except maybe $X_n$ is acyclic, then so is $X_n$. Indeed, you can split your sequence in short ones : $$ 0\rightarrow X_0\rightarrow X_1\rightarrow \operatorname{Im}d^1\rightarrow 0$$ $$ 0\rightarrow \operatorname{Im}d^1\rightarrow X_2\rightarrow \operatorname{Im}d^2\rightarrow 0$$ $$ 0\rightarrow \operatorname{Im}d^2\rightarrow X_3\rightarrow \operatorname{Im}d^3\rightarrow 0$$ $$...$$ $$ 0\rightarrow \operatorname{Im}d^{n-2}\rightarrow X_{n-1}\rightarrow X_n\rightarrow 0$$ Now by the claim, $\operatorname{Im}d^1$ is acyclic as a quotient of two acyclics, then $\operatorname{Im}d^2$ is acyclic as a quotient of two acyclics, and so on... thus $X_n$ is also acyclic.

However, as you have noted, the sequence is not assumed to be exact on the left. And this is the crucial point ! So let $X_0\rightarrow X_1\rightarrow ...\rightarrow X_{n-1}\rightarrow X_n\rightarrow 0$ be a long exact sequence such that each $X_i$ are acyclic except maybe $X_n$ and assume that $F$ has cohomological dimension $\leq n$. Write $K$ for the kernel of $X_0\rightarrow X_1$, you can again split the long exact sequence into short ones : $$0\rightarrow K\rightarrow X_0\rightarrow\operatorname{Im}d^0\rightarrow 0$$ $$0\rightarrow \operatorname{Im}d^0\rightarrow X_1\rightarrow\operatorname{Im}d^1\rightarrow 0$$ $$...$$ $$0\rightarrow \operatorname{Im}d^{n-2}\rightarrow X_{n-1}\rightarrow X_n\rightarrow 0$$ Let $k>0$, then from the long exact sequences you get : $$0=R^kF(X_{n-1})\rightarrow R^k F(X_n)\rightarrow R^{k+1}F(\operatorname{Im} d^{n-2})\rightarrow R^{k+1}F(X_{n-1})=0$$ $$0=R^{k+1}F(X_{n-2})\rightarrow F^{k+1}F(\operatorname{Im}d^{n-2})\rightarrow R^{k+2}F(\operatorname{Im}d^{n-3})\rightarrow R^{k+2}F(X_{n-2})=0$$ $$...$$ $$0=R^{k+n-1}F(X_0)\rightarrow R^{k+n-1}F(\operatorname{Im}d^0)\rightarrow R^{k+n}F(K)\rightarrow R^{k+n}F(X_0)=0$$ Thus, you have isomorphisms $$R^kF(X_n)\overset{\sim}\rightarrow R^{k+1}F(\operatorname{Im}d^{n-2})\overset{\sim}\rightarrow...\overset{\sim}\rightarrow R^{k+n-1}F(\operatorname{Im}d^0)\overset{\sim}\rightarrow R^{k+n}F(K)$$ But the last object is $0$ since $k+n>n$ and $F$ has cohomological dimension $\leq n$. So $R^kF(X_n)=0$, and this holds for every $k>0$. Therefore $X_n$ is acyclic.

Another proof closer to what you had in mind, but requiring the use of hyperderived functors : Again, let $k>0$, $K$ be the kernel of $X_0\rightarrow X_1$ and $X_*$ be the complex $X_0\rightarrow X_1\rightarrow...\rightarrow X_{n-1}$. You have a short exact sequence of complexes : $$ 0\rightarrow K[n-1]\rightarrow X_*\rightarrow X_n[0]\rightarrow 0$$ Thus, you have a long exact sequence $$ R^kF(X_*)\rightarrow R^k(X_n)\rightarrow R^{k+1}F(K[n-1])\rightarrow R^{k+1}F(X_*)$$ As you said in your post, $R^kF(X_*)=H^kF(X_*)=0$ since $k>0$ and $X_*$ is a complex of acyclics in non positive (cohomological) degree. The same holds for $R^{k+1}F(X_*)=0$. Thus, you have an isomorphism $$R^k F(X_n)\overset{\sim}\longrightarrow R^{k+1}F(K[n-1])=R^{k+n}F(K)$$ But this last object is zero because $F$ is of cohomological dimension $\leq n$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.