0
$\begingroup$

$\newcommand{\vertiii}[1]{{\left\vert\kern-0.25ex\left\vert\kern-0.25ex\left\vert #1 \right\vert\kern-0.25ex\right\vert\kern-0.25ex\right\vert}}$ Let $X=\left(\ell_1, \|\cdot\|_2\right)$ and $(\phi_n)_n\subset\mathcal{B}(\ell_1\to \mathbb{R})$ be a sequence of bounded maps, where $\phi_n(x)=\sum\limits_{k=1}^n x_k$. Show that $(\phi_n)_n$ converges pointwise but $\sup_n \vertiii{\phi_n}:=\sup\limits_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\sup\limits_{x\in\ell_1, \|\cdot\|_2\le 1} |\phi_n(x)|=\infty$.

To prove that $(\phi_n)_n$ converges pointwise, let $x\in\ell_1$, then for every $\varepsilon > 0$, $\exists n_\varepsilon \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $n\ge n_\varepsilon\implies \sum\limits_{k=n}^\infty |x_k|<\varepsilon$. Let $\varepsilon>0$ and $n\ge n_\varepsilon$ and consider

$$|\phi_n(x)-\phi(x)|=\left|\sum\limits_{k=1}^n x_k - \sum\limits_{k=1}^\infty x_k \right| = \left| \sum\limits_{k=n+1}^\infty x_k\right|\le \sum\limits_{k+1}^\infty |x_k|<\varepsilon.$$

Hence, $(\phi_n)_n$ converges pointwise.

By the Uniform Boundedness Principle we also know that there exists $Y\subset \ell_1$ such that $\vertiii{\phi_n(x)}$ converges to $\vertiii{\phi(x)}$ for all $x\in Y$.

However, the problem I'm experiencing is that I do not understand how to calculate $\sup_n \vertiii{\phi_n}:=\sup\limits_{n\in\mathbb{N}}\sup\limits_{x\in\ell_1, \|\cdot\|_2\le 1} |\phi_n(x)|=\infty$. That is, I don't see the mechanics behind this definition. It is suggested to use the Hölder's inequality, but I don't even know how, in this case.

$\phi_n(x)$ appears to be a bounded operator, so its norm can probably be calculated as $$\sup\limits_{x\in Y}\frac{|\phi_n(x)|}{\|x\|_2},$$ but here the condition is that $\|x\|_2\le 1$.

Can someone please give me a clue of how to sort this out? And also how is the Uniform Boundedness principle related to the solution of this problem?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The definition of $\phi_n$ on the first line doesn't seem to be right - should it be a sum up to $n$ instead of $\infty$? $\endgroup$ – Nate Eldredge Nov 30 '17 at 3:17
  • $\begingroup$ @NateEldredge Sorry, yes. Editing. $\endgroup$ – sequence Nov 30 '17 at 6:04
1
$\begingroup$

$||\phi_n||=n^{1/2}$. It is clear (by Cauchy -Scwartz inequality) that $||\phi_n|| \leq n^{1/2}$. The maximum is attained when $x_i=n^{-1/2}$ for $i \leq n$ and 0 for $i>n$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Sorry, what does $E\|\phi_n\|$ mean? I haven't seen this notation. Can you please explain this in more detail - where exactly do you apply Cauchy-Schwartz inequality? $\endgroup$ – sequence Nov 30 '17 at 7:56
  • $\begingroup$ Very sorry! Simply delete E in both places. $\endgroup$ – Kavi Rama Murthy Nov 30 '17 at 9:29
  • $\begingroup$ @KaviRamaMurthy: Why not correct it yourself? Use the edit button. $\endgroup$ – Nate Eldredge Nov 30 '17 at 13:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.