Let $X$ be an integer curve of (arithmetic) genus $g=0$. (the arithmetic genus $g$ is defined by $g:= 1 -\chi_k(\mathcal{O}_X)$ where $\mathcal{O}_X$ is the structure sheaf of $X$ and $\chi_k(\mathcal{O}_X) := \sum _{i \ge 0} (-1)^i dim_k H^i(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$ the Euler-Poincare characteristic of $\mathcal{O}_X$.

Let assump that there exist a $k$-valued point $a \in X(k)$. I wan't to show that the induced Cartier Divisor $\mathcal{O}_X(a)$ is globally generated, therefore for every $x \in X$ there exist a global section $s \in \Gamma(X, \mathcal{O}_X(a)= H^0(X,\mathcal{O}_X(a)) $ such that the stalk $s_x$ at $x$ is not zero:

My attempts:

I firstly considered the exact sequence

$0 \to \mathcal{O}_X \to \mathcal{O}_X(a) \to \mathcal{F} \to 0$

where $\mathcal{F}$ is cokernel of the sequence.

This provides a long exact sequence of $\mathcal{O}_X(X)=H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_X)$-modules

$0 \to H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_X) \to H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_X(a)) \to H^0(X, \mathcal{F}) \to H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_X) \to ...$

Because $g=0$ and $H^i(X, \mathcal{O}_X)=0$ for $i \ge 2$ we conclude $H^1(X, \mathcal{O}_X)=0$.

Futhermore I suppose that $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_X) =k$ (why?)

So I can simplify my sequence to

$0 \to k \to H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_X(a)) \to \to H^0(X, \mathcal{F}) \to 0$

My goal will be to show that $1$ is mapped in the left module morphism to an invertible element in $H^0(X, \mathcal{O}_X(a))$, but I don't know how to conclude it

  • $\begingroup$ You have not used the fact, that you actually know how the cokernel looks like. It is a skyscraper sheaf supported at $a$ with stalk $k$. $\endgroup$ – MooS Nov 30 '17 at 9:59

Let $i: \{a\} \to X$ be the inclusion of your point. Note that $\{a\} = \operatorname{Spec} k$ by the assumption that $a$ is $k$-valued.

Note that your exact sequence comes from the exact sequence

$$0 \to \mathcal O_X(-a) \to \mathcal O_X \to i_* \mathcal O_a \to 0$$

We have $\mathcal O_a = k$, hence the co-kernel is just a skyscraper sheaf supported at $a$ with stalk $k$.

Also note that the first map of the sequence is an isomorphism away from $a$. Now we tensor with $\mathcal O_X(a)$ to obtain

$$0 \to \mathcal O_X \to \mathcal O_X(a) \to k \to 0.$$

Note that the co-kernel does not change, because $\mathcal O_X(a)$ is free of rank $1$ at $a$, i.e. tensoring with it does not change anything locally at $a$.

Of course the first map is still an isomorphism away from $a$. In particular the image of $1 \in H^0(X,\mathcal O_X)$ will generate $\mathcal O_X(a)$ at all points but $a$. To get a global section which generates at the point $a$, we take the long exact sequence and as you have figured out yourself, the genus assumption yields $H^1(X,\mathcal O_X)=0$, i.e. we get

$$0 \to k \to H^0(X,\mathcal O_X(a)) \to k \to 0$$

In particular $\dim H^0(X,\mathcal O_X(a))=2$ and the "other global section besides $1$", i.e. a pre-image of $1$ along the surjective map $H^0(X,\mathcal O_X(a)) \to k$ generates $\mathcal O_X(a)$ at $a$.

  • $\begingroup$ Hi. Thank you for your enlightening answer. Indeed your argument pointed precisely out why the preimage of $1 \in k$ in the map $H^0(X,\mathcal O_X(a)) \to k$ doesn't vanishes at stalk $\mathcal O_X(a)_a$. The only still unclear argument is your phrasing that "the map above is still an isomorphism away from $a$". Do you mean this in sense of restrictions to all stalks at $x \in X$ with $x \neq a$ and under using the fact that $\mathcal O_X$ as structure scheaf is always (?) globally generated? $\endgroup$ – KarlPeter Dec 1 '17 at 12:05
  • $\begingroup$ If you have an isomorphism at stalks (away from $a$), this does not change after tensoring, because tensoring commutes with taking stalks. I do not need any property of the structure sheaf or global generation or whatever for this. $\endgroup$ – MooS Dec 1 '17 at 12:09

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.