12
$\begingroup$

The exercise I'm working on is "Show that $\{x\} \times \{x\} = \{\{\{x\}\}\}$".

The solution I'm seeing says that this is equal to $\{\{\{x\}\}\}$, but I don't get this yet.

Here's what I do understand:

  • $\{x\}\times\{x\}$ should be the set of ordered pairs whose first coordinate is in $\{x\}$ and whose second coordinate is also in $\{x\}$.
  • The only thing in $\{x\}$ is $x$.
  • The cartesian product is a set.
  • An ordered pair is a set.

So if $x$ is the only thing in $\{x\}$, then the only ordered pair of $\{x\} \times \{x\}$ should be $\{x\}$, and the cartesian product should be the set of all of those ordered pairs, i.e. $\{\{x\}\}$.

Any hints as to what I'm missing?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Note that this is a consequence of a standard way of defining an ordered pair. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Nov 27 '17 at 4:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ It's so interesting to me that an ordered pair is defined -- in this standard way -- as a set of sets. I wonder if that's conceptually or even psychologically true, or just a formal trick. Meaning, is our concept of an ordered pair really of a collection of a collection? I'm confused thinking about this. $\endgroup$ – MBP Nov 27 '17 at 4:13
  • $\begingroup$ There are various definitions, see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…. $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Nov 27 '17 at 4:29
  • 10
    $\begingroup$ @MBP Everything in typical set theory (i.e. ZFC) is a set and the only way to get any structure at all is to nest them. The only thing that isn't a set of sets is the empty set (and arguably that's just an empty set of sets...) I would say our concept of an ordered pair isn't a set of sets, but the point of set theory is to show that it (and every other mathematical concept) can be implemented as a set of sets, but no particular implementation is the concept. $\endgroup$ – Derek Elkins Nov 27 '17 at 5:35
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/…, in particular en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ordered_pair#Kuratowski.27s_definition. $\endgroup$ – user236182 Nov 27 '17 at 15:51
30
$\begingroup$

The set $\{x\}\times \{x\}$ is the singleton containing the ordered pair $(x,x)$, i.e. $\{x\}\times\{x\} = \{(x,x)\}$. By definition, $(x,x) = \{\{x\},\{x,x\}\}$. This last set is equal to $\{\{x\},\{x\}\}$ since $\{x,x\} = \{x\}$, and this final set is equal to $\{\{x\}\}$ since $\{x\} = \{x\}$. Hence $\{x\}\times\{x\} = \{\{\{x\}\}\}$.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Thank you! I needed to go back to the definition of an ordered pair. $\endgroup$ – MBP Nov 27 '17 at 4:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.