1
$\begingroup$

Let us assume that $$A=\left[\begin{array}{rrr}2&-1&-1\\-1&2&-1\\-1&-1&2\end{array}\right].$$

Then, eigenvalues of $A$ is $0, 3, 3$.

For $\lambda_1=0$, I could find its eigenvector as $\begin{bmatrix}1\\ 1\\ 1\end{bmatrix}$.

For $\lambda_1=3$, I could find its eigenvector as $\left[\begin{array}r0\\ 1\\ -1\end{array}\right]$ and $\left[\begin{array}r0\\ -1\\ 1\end{array}\right]$.

Thus, I set $S=\left[\begin{array}{rrr}1&0&0\\1&1&-1\\1&-1&1\end{array}\right]$ and $\Lambda=\begin{bmatrix}0&0&0\\0&3&0\\0&0&3\end{bmatrix}$.

The problem is $S\times \Lambda \times S^{-1}$ does not give $A$.

By matlab, $S$ is given as $\left[\begin{array}{rrr}0.5774&0.7634&0.2895\\0.5774&-0.6325&0.5164\\0.5774&-0.1310&-0.8059\end{array}\right]$

Using $S$ given by matlab, $S\times \Lambda \times S^{-1}$ gives $A$.

The textbook said the $i$th column of $S$ must be the eigenvector corresponding the $i$th eigenvalue of $A$.

I think this problem happens because two lambdas are same as $3$.

How can I find correct $S$?

|cite|improve this question|||||
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Observe that the two eigenvectors you take for $\;\lambda=3\;$ are linearly dependent ... $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Nov 26 '17 at 7:32
2
$\begingroup$

Directly:

$$|xI-A|=\begin{vmatrix} x-2&1&1\\ 1&x-2&1\\ 1&1&x-2\end{vmatrix}=(x-2)^3+2-3(x-2)=x^3-6x^2+9x\implies$$

the eigenvalues are $\;0,\,3\;$, the last one of multiplicity two, and a basis for the corresponding eigenspaces is

$$\left\{\,\begin{pmatrix}1\\1\\1\end{pmatrix}\,,\;\begin{pmatrix}1\\\!-1\\0\end{pmatrix}\,,\;\begin{pmatrix}1\\0\\\!-1\end{pmatrix}\,\right\}$$

Try to take it from here now.

|cite|improve this answer|||||
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, I got it. I should have chosen independent columns. May I ask one more thing? If I find $S$ such that $S^{-1}=S^{\text{T}}$ and $S\Lambda{S^{-1}}=A$, then $A=(S\sqrt{\Lambda})\times (S\sqrt{\Lambda})^\text{T}=K\times K^\text{T}$. Can I find all possible $T$? $\endgroup$ – Danny_Kim Nov 26 '17 at 7:54
  • $\begingroup$ @Danny_Kim You can find $\;S\;$ s.t. $\;S^{-1}=S^T\;$ ... I understand you haven't yet studied the spectral theorem in linear algebra? And what do you mean whether you can find all possible $\;T\;$ ?? What is $\;T\;$ for you in your comment? $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Nov 26 '17 at 8:00
  • $\begingroup$ If I use Gram-Schumit formula, I can find $S$ such that $S^TS = I$, isn't it? I am ultinately wondering if we can find all possible matrix $T$ such that $A=T^TT$ $\endgroup$ – Danny_Kim Nov 26 '17 at 8:02
  • $\begingroup$ @Danny_Kim Yes, use GS on the eigenvectors' basis...and don't use the very same letter for both a matrix and its transpose. It is highly confusing...and observe that any orthogonal $\;S\;$ that diagonalizes $\;A\;$ , and there are infinitely many ones ones, will give you $\;A=SS^t\;$ . $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Nov 26 '17 at 8:04
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, thank you for giving good comments. I just want to specify a set of matrices of $S$'s that satisfy $A=SS^\text{T}$ $\endgroup$ – Danny_Kim Nov 26 '17 at 8:08

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.