Fejer's theorem for Fourier transforms of $L^1(\mathbb{R})$ functions I know there is a version of Fejer's theorem stating:"If $f$ is a function in $L^1(\mathbb{(- \pi, \pi)})$ then its Fejer's sums converge to $f$ in $L^1$ norm". 

The question is: is this still true for Fourier transforms? I mean, is it true that 
  $$\lim_{N\to \infty}\frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{-N}^{N} \left(1- \frac{|\phi|}{N} \right) \widehat{f(\phi)} e^{ix \phi} d\phi = f(x)$$
  in $L^1(\mathbb{R})$ for $f \in L^1(\mathbb{R})$? 

I know this is true for continuous functions, and that the proof is very similar for both Fejer's sums and for this integral (you still use a convolution).
The problem here is that for the proof above (both for Fourier series and Fourier transform) you evaluate the $f$ at some point and say it is bounded. So how do you do for $L^1$ functions, whose value is not defined in single points?
 A: 
The answer is yes if $f,\widehat{f} \in L^1(\Bbb R)$

The following results are well known:

Theorem: 1-$f\in L^1(\Bbb R)$ then $\widehat{f} $ is continuous.


2-similarly, $f, \widehat{f} \in L^1(\Bbb R)$ then $f$ is continuous.


3- If $f,\widehat{f} \in L^1(\Bbb R)$ Then, $$ \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{\Bbb R} \widehat{f(\phi)} e^{ix \phi} d\phi =  f(x)$$

Let $f_N(\phi)=   \left(1- \frac{|\phi|}{N} \right) \widehat{f(\phi)} e^{ix \phi}\mathbf1_{(-N,N)}(\phi) \to \widehat{f(\phi)} e^{ix \phi} $
We have,
$$\lim_{N\to\infty}f_N(\phi)=   \lim_{N\to\infty}\left(1- \frac{|\phi|}{N} \right) \widehat{f(\phi)} e^{ix \phi}\mathbf1_{(-N,N)}(\phi) =\widehat{f(\phi)} e^{ix \phi} $$  pointwise and
$$|f_N(\phi)| =   |\left(1- \frac{|\phi|}{N} \right) \widehat{f(\phi)} e^{ix \phi}\mathbf1_{(-N,N)}(\phi)|\le |\widehat{f(\phi)}| \in L^1(\Bbb R). $$
Then by convergence dominated theorem and the above theorem we have,
$$\lim_{N\to\infty} \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{-N}^{N} \left(1- \frac{|\phi|}{N} \right) \widehat{f(\phi)} e^{ix \phi} d\phi \to \frac{1}{2 \pi} \int_{\Bbb R} \widehat{f(\phi)} e^{ix \phi} d\phi =  f(x).$$

Counterexample:
Now if $\widehat{f} \not\in L^1(\Bbb R)$ then it is not always true take

$$f(x) =\mathbf1_{(-1,1)}(x) $$
then, $$\widehat{f}(\phi) =c\frac{\sin\phi}{\phi}\not\in L^1(\Bbb R)$$
You can check that The property fails here.
