1
$\begingroup$

I was looking for an elementary proof of the following assertion:

Let $n\in \mathbb{N}$ and let $G$ be a free abelian group of finite rank $n$. Let $H\subset G$ be a subgroup of rank $n$. Then $G$ has a generating set $\left \{\beta_1,\cdots ,\beta_n\right \}$ such that (for appropriate integers $d_i$) $\left \{d_1\beta_1,\cdots ,d_n\beta_n\right \}$ is a generating set of $H$.

I found a proof which does not convince me. I suspect there must be some errata which I cannot find, or maybe I am just not understanding the proof. It goes as follows:

We can prove this by induction on $n$. This is rather clear for $n=1$, so assume the result for $n-1$.

For any basis $\alpha_1,\cdots ,\alpha_n$ of $G$ look at all elements $h\in H$ which, when expressed in this basis, have positive coefficient of $\alpha_1$. Of all possible bases and elements of $H$ choose these which make this coefficient the least possible, say equal to $d_1$. We claim that every element of $H$ has every coefficient with respect to this basis divisible by $d_1$. We first prove this for $h$: if $h$ had a coefficient $a$ of $\alpha_i$ not divisible by $d_i$, then we could write $a = qd_i + r$, $0 < r < d_i$. But then if we replaced the basis $\alpha_1,\cdots ,\alpha_n$ with $\alpha_1+q\alpha_i,\cdots ,\alpha_n$ (easily seen to be another basis), then we easily see the coefficient of $\alpha_i$ would be $r$, so rearranging the basis would contradict the choice of $d_1$. Hence $\beta_1 = \frac{\alpha_1}{d_1}\in G$.

Similarly, we establish that for every $h_0 \in H$, the coefficient of $\alpha_1$ is divisible by $d_1$, say it’s $qd_1$. Then $h_0 − qh$ is contained in the group $G_1$ generated by $\alpha_2,\cdots ,\alpha_n$. Let $H_1 = H\cap G_1$. Also, let $H_0$ be the group generated by $\alpha_1$. It follows that $H = H_0\oplus H_1$. By induction, there is a basis $\beta_2,...,\beta_n$ for $G_1$ and integers $d_2,\cdots ,d_n$ such that $d_2\beta_2,\cdots ,d_n\beta_n$ are a basis for $H_1$. Then $\beta_1,\cdots ,\beta_n$ and $d_1,\cdots ,d_n$ work for $G$ and $H$.

I have several questions about this proof.

1) I think we did not prove that "every element of $H$ has every coefficient with respect to this basis divisible by $d_1$", but "$h$ has every coefficient with respect to this basis divisible by $d_1$ and the other elements of $H$ have their first coefficient divisible by $d_1$". Am I right?

2) What is the meaning of $\beta_1=\frac{\alpha_1}{d_1}$? We are in an abelian group, we cannot divide by natural numbers, unless the element was originally multiplied by $d_1$, right?

3) Why is $H=H_0\oplus H_1$? We had defined $H_0$ to be the group generated by $\alpha_1$. Why it is even a subgroup of $H$? This makes no sense to me.

As I said, maybe I am just not understanding the proof, but I think there must be some errata which I do not know how to fix. I would like to have the complete corrected proof. Any help would be appreciated.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ You might find a proof of this in the context of free $\Bb{Z}$-modules. $\endgroup$ – G Tony Jacobs Nov 11 '17 at 16:43
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you, but I am not looking for another proof. I am trying to understand this one. $\endgroup$ – solomeo paredes Nov 11 '17 at 16:47
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that’s why I posted this as a comment, and not as an answer. Even if you don’t find it helpful, another reader might. :) $\endgroup$ – G Tony Jacobs Nov 11 '17 at 16:48
  • $\begingroup$ I'm looking over this more carefully, and I think you're right that there are some problems. Where did you find this proof? $\endgroup$ – G Tony Jacobs Nov 12 '17 at 16:09
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much, I was worried because noone answered. :( This is exercise 27(b) of the second chapter of Dr. Daniel Marcus' book on Number Fields, and I found the solution of all exercises of the first two chapters here: wojowu.files.wordpress.com/2016/10/number-fields-solutions.pdf $\endgroup$ – solomeo paredes Nov 12 '17 at 18:41
1
$\begingroup$

1) What we have shown is that, for every element of $H$, the coefficient of $\alpha_1$ is a multiple of $d_1$. We don't know anything about the other coefficients of $h$, as is clear from an example:

Let $G$ be $\Bbb{Z}\times\Bbb{Z}$, let $H$ be generated by $(3,0)$ and $(0,4)$, let $\alpha_1=(1,0),\alpha_2=(0,1)$, and $h=(3,4)=3\alpha_1+4\alpha_2$. Clearly, we have $d_1=3$, and the second coefficient of $h$ has nothing to do with that.

2) I think you're right, that $\frac{\alpha_1}{d_1}$ is incoherent. We should be setting $\beta_1=\alpha_1$.

3) At this point, it looks like we want to let $H_0$ be generated by $d_1\alpha_1$, not by $\alpha_1$. I think the author got the first basis element for $H$ and the first basis element for $G$ confused, which would also explain the strange quotient in your second question.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ For the first one: remember that we had chosen both $h$ and the basis so that the first coefficient is minimized (the basis, in this sense, is an ORDERED basis). Therefore the basis $\left \{\alpha_1,\alpha_2\right \}$ is not a valid one, instead we should choose the basis $\left \{\alpha_2,\alpha_1\right \}$. In this sense, I suspect that the assertion that ALL coefficients are divisible by $d_1$ is a true assertion (in your example, $d_1=1$). Am I right? $\endgroup$ – solomeo paredes Nov 12 '17 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, good point. Let me alter my example. $\endgroup$ – G Tony Jacobs Nov 12 '17 at 19:06
  • $\begingroup$ Hrmm. No, I've got to think about that part more. Choosing over all possible bases of $H$ is more complicated. $\endgroup$ – G Tony Jacobs Nov 12 '17 at 19:08
  • $\begingroup$ That doesn't even make sense. If we're writing elements of $H$ in terms of the basis of $G$, why does it matter which basis of $H$ we have in mind? Either way, see my edit. $\endgroup$ – G Tony Jacobs Nov 12 '17 at 19:13
  • $\begingroup$ It is still a wrong example. $H$ is fixed to be $<(3,0),(0,4)>$. Once $H$ is fixed, we have to choose $h$ and the basis of $G$ properly. For example, your basis $\left \{(1,0),(0,1)\right \}$ is not a good one, because $\left \{(-1,0),(1,1)\right \}$ is a better one for the $h$ you chose (we again obtain $d_1=1$). $\endgroup$ – solomeo paredes Nov 12 '17 at 19:22

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.