2
$\begingroup$

I know this question has been asked before, but the answers I have come across I need a little more help understanding how to implement. I came across this answer here, but the cited link does not appear to be valid anymore. Also searching elsewhere says it is not possible, or is very hard to find how to do this, or is so heavily filled with mathematical lingo, so please help!

https://math.stackexchange.com/q/302145

I have a cubic Bezier curve that passes through 6 points. The knowns are

t0 = 0, t5 = 1, P0 = xy0, P3 = xy5, xy0-xy5

Unknowns are

t1, t2, t3, t4, P1, P2

I know how to create the curve by merging two bezier curves each with 4 control points, but I only want one curve with 4 control points and I know it exists.

I have 8 unknown equations for t values and 2 control points. Can I solve this using matrices and how would I set it up?

C(t0) = po(1-t0)³ + p1(3*t0(1-t0)²) + p2(3*t0²(1-t0)) + p3(t0³) = x0, P0
C(t1) = po(1-t1)³ + p1(3*t1(1-t1)²) + p2(3*t1²(1-t1)) + p3(t1³) = x1
C(t2) = po(1-t2)³ + p1(3*t2(1-t2)²) + p2(3*t2²(1-t2)) + p3(t2³) = x2
C(t3) = po(1-t3)³ + p1(3*t3(1-t3)²) + p2(3*t3²(1-t3)) + p3(t3³) = x3
C(t4) = po(1-t4)³ + p1(3*t4(1-t4)²) + p2(3*t4²(1-t4)) + p3(t4³) = x4
C(t5) = po(1-t5)³ + p1(3*t5(1-t5)²) + p2(3*t5²(1-t5)) + p3(t5³) = x5, P3

I am implementing in code, so can use a solver, but need to know the beginning steps and logic and how I would go about solving in the right way.

Update 11/15

So I thought I would post my working code. I actually had 7 points, not 6. Its not the prettiest, as Im on time constraints, but it works. Thx Bubba. and the link is working for me now.

from scipy.optimize import fsolve

#define x0-x6 and y0-y6

def solveEquations(params):
    t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,xp1,yp1,xp2, yp2  = params
    t0 = 0
    t6 = 1

    return (   x0*(1-t1)**3 + xp1*(3*t1*(1-t1)**2) + xp2*(3*t1**2*(1-t1)) + x6*(t1**3) - x1,
               x0*(1-t2)**3 + xp1*(3*t2*(1-t2)**2) + xp2*(3*t2**2*(1-t2)) + x6*(t2**3) - x2,
               x0*(1-t3)**3 + xp1*(3*t3*(1-t3)**2) + xp2*(3*t3**2*(1-t3)) + x6*(t3**3) - x3,
               x0*(1-t4)**3 + xp1*(3*t4*(1-t4)**2) + xp2*(3*t4**2*(1-t4)) + x6*(t4**3) - x4,
               x0*(1-t5)**3 + xp1*(3*t5*(1-t5)**2) + xp2*(3*t5**2*(1-t5)) + x6*(t5**3) - x5,

               y0*(1-t1)**3 + yp1*(3*t1*(1-t1)**2) + yp2*(3*t1**2*(1-t1)) + y6*(t1**3) - y1,
               y0*(1-t2)**3 + yp1*(3*t2*(1-t2)**2) + yp2*(3*t2**2*(1-t2)) + y6*(t2**3) - y2,
               y0*(1-t3)**3 + yp1*(3*t3*(1-t3)**2) + yp2*(3*t3**2*(1-t3)) + y6*(t3**3) - y3,
               y0*(1-t4)**3 + yp1*(3*t4*(1-t4)**2) + yp2*(3*t4**2*(1-t4)) + y6*(t4**3) - y4,

        )
t1,t2,t3,t4,t5,xp1,yp1,xp2, yp2 = fsolve(solveEquations, (.2,.4,.6,.7,.9,9,5,5,-8))

print xp1, yp1, xp2, yp2
$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ I changed the link to the Kozak/Krajnc paper. $\endgroup$
    – bubba
    Nov 13, 2017 at 1:54

1 Answer 1

2
$\begingroup$

It seems to me that your list of "knowns" might have typos.

Suppose we use $Q_0, \ldots, Q_5$ to denote the 6 points that the cubic curve must pass through. We need to find 4 control points $P_0, P_1, P_2, P_3$ and 6 parameter values $t_0, \ldots, t_5$ such that $C(t_i) = Q_i$ for $i=0,1,\ldots,5$.

We can assume that $t_0 =0$ and $t_5 = 1$. Then we know immediately that $P_0 = Q_0$ and $P_3 = Q_5$. So the remaining unknowns are $P_1$, $P_2$ and $t_1,t_2,t_3,t_4$. Is that correct? If so, that's $8$ unknowns, and we can calculate these (in principle) from the $8$ equations $C(t_i) = Q_i$ for $i=1,2,3,4$.

The answer you cited gives you two brute-force methods of solving this problem, which should be fairly easy to implement in code, assuming that you have good numerical methods already available. However, note that you need to solve non-linear equations or do non-linear optimization, so you need more than just a linear system solver. You ask "can I solve this with matrices". If I understand your question correctly, the answer is "no".

The smarter way to construct the curve is by using the approach given in the Kozak/Krajnc paper, but that requires more mathematical background than the brute-force methods.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ bubba yes! I had my fingers crossed hoping you would answer. I do admit my question was a bit sloppy, please forgive me, my brain is way past its overload point but I have to get this done. Unfortunately it still seems the pdf links wont work to that site, but you did steer me in the right direction. I ended up using fsolve , which outputs my control points beautifully. Thank you for taking the time to answer, you never know how many people you impact. $\endgroup$
    – ksmith
    Nov 13, 2017 at 19:21

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .