0
$\begingroup$

Let $A\subset \mathbb R^n$ be a closed n-dimensional cell and $$X=A\cap\mathbb Q^n=\{x_1,x_2,\dots,x_k,\dots\}$$ be a enumeration of $A\cap\mathbb Q^n$. Define $f\colon A\to\mathbb R$ by $$f(x)\colon\begin{cases}\frac{1}{2^k}, \textrm{ if } x=x_k\in X;\\ 0, \textrm{ if } x\in A-X\end{cases}.$$

Is this function integrable?

My attempt

Since the set of discontinuous points of $f$ is A (which has measure not zero), the function isn't integrable.

But, on the other hand, given $\varepsilon>0$ define $A_\varepsilon=\{x\in A: f(x)\geq \varepsilon\}$. Then $A_\varepsilon=\{x_1, x_2,\dots, {x_k}_\varepsilon\}$ is finite. Define a partition $P_\varepsilon$ of $A$ such that $B_1, B_2,\dots,{B_k}_\varepsilon\in P_\varepsilon$ with $B_i\cap A_\varepsilon=\{x_i\}, 1\leq i \leq k_\varepsilon$ and $$\sum_{i=1}^{k_\varepsilon}vol(B_i)<\varepsilon.$$ Then, $L(f,P_\varepsilon)=0, M_{B_i}\leq 1/2$ and $f(x)<\varepsilon$ for $x\in A-A_\varepsilon$. So $$U(f, P_\varepsilon)-L(f, P_\varepsilon)=\sum_{i=1}^{k_\varepsilon}M_{B_i}vol(B_i) + \sum_{B\in P_\varepsilon, B\neq B_i} M_B vol(B)$$ $$< \frac{1}{2}\sum_{i=1}^{k_\varepsilon}vol(B_i)+\sum_{B\in P_\varepsilon, B\neq B_i} \varepsilon vol(B)$$ $$< \frac{1}{2}\varepsilon+\varepsilon vol(A)=\left(\frac{1}{2}+vol(A)\right)\varepsilon.$$ Thus, $f$ is integrable.

Which solution is correct?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your function is disconnected everywhere (or maybe the indicator function of $X$ is). Nevertheless, it is integrable and its integral is 0. Also the indicator function of X is also integrable of integral 0, simply because $f$ is bounded and the set $X$ has measure $0$. (In this comment, all is with respect to the Lebesgue measure.) $\endgroup$ – Thibaut Dumont Nov 9 '17 at 23:00
  • $\begingroup$ "isn't integrable" with respect to what measure? (riemann vs lebesgue) $\endgroup$ – Max Nov 9 '17 at 23:01
  • $\begingroup$ It should be clear that the OP is thinking "integrable" means "Riemann integrable", but the OP should make this clear $\endgroup$ – zhw. Nov 9 '17 at 23:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Pretty sure your function is continuous at any point that has at least one irrational co-ordinate. $\endgroup$ – JonathanZ Nov 9 '17 at 23:07
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ "Since the set of discontinuous points of $f$ is A" That's false. $\endgroup$ – zhw. Nov 9 '17 at 23:12
1
$\begingroup$

Here's a sketch of how you can show $f$ is continuous at any point $x_0$ that has at least one irrational co-ordinate (which is the same as $ x_0 \in A - X$, in your notation):

Use the basic $\epsilon$-$ \delta$ definition of continuity. Since $f(x_0) = 0 $, if we are given a $ \epsilon > 0 $ we need to find a $\delta$ neighborhood of $x_0$ on which $|f| < \epsilon$. If you take a $N$ large enough so that $1/2^N < \epsilon$, then there are only a finite number of points where $f(x) \ge 1/2^N$, i.e. $\{x_1, ... x_N \}$, the first $N$ points in your enumeration of $A \cap \mathbb{Q}^n$. Make your $\delta$ small enough so that none of those points are in your neighborhood and you're done. (I'm leaving it up to you to write an explicit formula for $\delta$.)

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.