0
$\begingroup$

I changed the title to hopefully clarify a bit: What i am trying to do is find a function that is always at a specific distance from another function i.e. a function where a drawn circle with radius $r=1$ with center on the function will always be tangented by another function. Read below for background info and what i started off writing (not necessary to know).

I want to make a circle run on a given function. What i have in mind is having a circle from the implicit function $(a-x)^2+(b-y)^2=r^2$ where i use $r=1$ and $a$ and $b$ are the $x$ and $y$ coordinates of the center of the circle, respectively. I would like to try with the parabola $f(x)=-x^2+2$ and i am mainly focusing on the interval $-5\leq x\leq 5$. I found it working to use the distance formula, $\sqrt{(a-x)^2+(b-f(x))^2}$ to plot how far away the circle center is from the function $f(x)$ at a given $x$. This may seem chaotic, so here is a picture of what i mean

Purple is the distance formula function while grey is the derivative of that

Now i am currently having a hard time wrapping my head around this, but i think i want to find a b-value (height of the circle center) where the distance at minimum is 1 (i.e. the purple function has a minimum of $y=1$ exactly.) So i want to find a b-value where the purple function is 1 while the grey function is 0. How do i do this? Is there a smarter way?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Your question isn't 100% clear, but are you asking how to construct a parallel curve? $\endgroup$ – Michael Seifert Nov 7 '17 at 21:18
  • $\begingroup$ No, i would like a function g(x) where the closest point to another function f(x) is always the same distance. Imagine a function on which you draw infinitely many circles. Now create a function that is tangent to all of those circles. I want to create that function based on f(x) being a parabola, $\endgroup$ – iBoughtWinrar Nov 7 '17 at 21:28
  • $\begingroup$ You just gave an exact description of a parallel curve; take a look at the link in my previous comment. I'll write up a brief answer to show how it's done in your case, but note that in general there isn't a nice answer of the form $y = g(x)$. $\endgroup$ – Michael Seifert Nov 7 '17 at 21:32
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Ah, my bad, i assumed too much from the word parallel $\endgroup$ – iBoughtWinrar Nov 7 '17 at 21:36
0
$\begingroup$

What you're looking for is a parallel curve. In your case, you would parametrize the parabola as \begin{align} x(t) &= t & y(t) &= -t^2 + 2 \end{align} The parallel curves would then be \begin{align} X(t) &= t - \frac{2rt}{\sqrt{4t^2 + 1}} & Y(t) &= -t^2+2 - \frac{r}{\sqrt{4t^2 + 1}}, \end{align} where $r$ is the desired radius of the circles along the curve. This gives you the parallel curve along one "side" of the original curve; for the other one, flip the sign of $r$ in each of the above equations.

You can plot these curves parametrically, obtaining the following: enter image description here

Note that the curve "inside" the parabola can't be possibly be expressed in the form $Y = g(X)$--there are multiple values of the $Y$ coordinate for some values of $X$. The "outside" parallel curve is better-behaved, but I still suspect that it can't be expressed in a nice form $Y(X)$; at best, you might be able to end up with a relation between $X$ and $Y$ where you can show that some polynomial in $X$ and $Y$ must vanish, but you can't solve it for $X$ or $Y$ explicitly.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ If anyone can figure out what the above-mentioned relation between $X$ and $Y$ should be, feel free to edit this answer to include it or post it as a comment below. $\endgroup$ – Michael Seifert Nov 7 '17 at 21:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.