0
$\begingroup$

"A bridge goes straight across a river at a height of $60$ m. A car on the bridge travelling at $40$ m/sec passes directly over a boat travelling up the river at $15$ m/sec. Find the rate at which the distance between the car and the boat is increasing 3 seconds later."

I don't think I need help on the actual problem itself but I'm a very hard time visualizing this situation. Is is possible for someone to draw me a picture of the situation? I just need to be able to visualize what is going on here.

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I'm no good at drawing pictures, but maybe this will help. Visualize a 3-dimensional coordinate system. The $y$-axis is the river. The bridge is parallel to the $x$-axis, but up at $z=60$. At time zero, the boat is at the origin, while the car is on the bridge, directly above the boat, at $(0,0,60)$. The car is moving to the right along the bridge at 40 m/sec, while the boat is heading up the $y$-axis at 15 m/sec. $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Nov 5 '17 at 23:15
  • $\begingroup$ That's the thing. I'm very skeptical this would be a 3D problem since we're only working with 2 dimensions at most. This isn't multivariable calculus or anything so I am not sure if 3D is required here. $\endgroup$ – Future Math person Nov 5 '17 at 23:17
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The action is taking place in 3D, but you don't need multivariable calculus to solve it. Everything is a function of a single variable, namely, the time. You can work out the position of the car at time $t$, and the position of the boat at time $t$, and then you need a little bit of 3D geometry (actually, just two applications of 2D Pythagoras) to get a formula for the distance between them at time $t$. $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Nov 5 '17 at 23:20
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The position of the bridge doesn't change, but you can't ignore the fact that the bridge is 60 meters up from the river. $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Nov 5 '17 at 23:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Imagine the bridge being a million miles high. Then the distance between car and boat will barely change at all as they move – it will stay very close to a million miles. So the height comes into the formula for the rate of change of the distance. But, look – just write down the formula for the distance, and see for yourself! $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Nov 5 '17 at 23:44
1
$\begingroup$

Here is a rendering of the scene:

the scene

The car travels at $$ r_c(t) = (v_c t, 0, 60) $$ (grey line), the boat at $$ r_b(t) = (0, v_b t, 0) $$ (light blue line). The distance (three difference vectors shown as black arrows) is $$ d(t) = \lVert r_c(t) - r_b(t) \rVert $$ and your task is to find $\dot{d}(t)$ for $t=3\text{s}$.

Hint: $\lVert (x,y,z) \rVert = \sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + z^2}$

Update:

It seems the dot on the $d$ did not get enough attention.

Find the rate at which the distance between the car and the boat is increasing 3 seconds later

A rate is a measure of change. In these context it is often the time derivative.

For convenience I had used $t=0$ as the time when the car is above the boat. But for completeness let us shift that to a time $t_0$ to be a bit more general, though it should lead to the same result.

Then we have $$ r_c(t) = (v_c(t-t_0), 0, 60) \\ r_b(t) = (0, v_b(t-t_0), 0) $$ Then the difference vector is $$ \Delta r(t) = r_c(t) - r_b(t) = (v_c (t-t_0), -v_b(t-t_0), 60) $$ and the length of this vector is the distance between car and boat: $$ d(t) = \lVert \Delta r(t) \rVert $$ Asked is for rate of change of the distance, this is the time derivative of the distance $$ \dot{d}(t) = d'(t) = \frac{d}{dt} d(t) $$ depending on your preference of notation.

And it is wanted 3 seconds later than the meeting time, thus $$ \dot{d}(t_0 + 3) $$ where I left out the physical units for the 3.

Putting everything together we get \begin{align} \dot{d}(t) &= \frac{d}{dt} \sqrt{(v_c (t-t_0))^2 + (-v_b(t-t_0))^2 + 60^2} \\ &= \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{(v_c (t-t_0))^2 + (-v_b(t-t_0))^2 + 60^2}} (2 v_c + 2 v_b) \\ &= \frac{v_c + v_b}{\sqrt{(v_c (t-t_0))^2 + (-v_b(t-t_0))^2 + 60^2}} \end{align} Inserting $t = t_0 + 3$ gives $$ \dot{d}(t_0 + 3) = \frac{v_c + v_b}{\sqrt{9(v_c^2 + v_b^2) + 60^2}} $$

The values for $v_c$ and $v_b$ were given in the task, so there is only one calculation left to do to get the desired rate.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Ohh boy. Well this would essentially collapse down to a 2D problem though no? The height of the bridge is fixed and the only variables I care about is the ship and the car right? $\endgroup$ – Future Math person Nov 5 '17 at 23:27
  • $\begingroup$ @FutureMathperson Correct $\endgroup$ – gen-z ready to perish Nov 5 '17 at 23:33
  • $\begingroup$ It's not a 2D problem – you can't ignore the height of the bridge when calculating the distance, and then you will find that it also comes into the rate of change of the distance. $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Nov 5 '17 at 23:41
  • $\begingroup$ But then is question is quite simple then. It would simply be $d(3) = \sqrt{120^2 + 45^2 + 60^2} = 15\sqrt{89}$ . I would then differentiate $d(t)$ and plug in my values for $x,y,z,x',y',z'$. Since $z' = 0$, that vanishes but everything else stays. Is that the correct intuition? $\endgroup$ – Future Math person Nov 5 '17 at 23:57
  • $\begingroup$ You don't want $d(3)$, you want $d(t)$. $\endgroup$ – Gerry Myerson Nov 6 '17 at 11:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.