Suppose $M^m$ and $N^n$ are smooth, connected, closed, oriented manifolds, with $m\ge n$.If we have a smooth map $f:M\rightarrow N$, we can define a graph as the submanifold $\Gamma=\{(x, f(x))\mid x\in M\}\subset M\times N$.

Is there an explicit description of the Poincare dual $\eta_\Gamma\in H^n(M\times N)$ of $\Gamma$?

Here, I'm thinking about a Poincare dual in the sense of Bott-Tu: it is the equivalence class $[\eta_\Gamma]\in H^n(M\times N)$ of a closed $n$-form $\eta_\Gamma$ with the property that, if $[\omega]\in H^m(M\times N)$ is any $m$-form, there is an equality $$ \int_\Gamma \omega_{|\Gamma}=\int_{M\times N}\omega\wedge\eta_\Gamma$$

My gut instinct was that $\eta_\Gamma=\pi_2^\ast\alpha$, where $\alpha\in H^n(N)$ is nonzero, and $\pi_2:M\times N\rightarrow N$ is projection. But this seems wrong, since it doesn't even mention $f$.

However, by taking $\omega=\pi_1^\ast\beta$ above (where $\beta\in H^m(M)$ is nonzero), it would seem that $\eta_\Gamma=\pi_2^\ast\alpha+\cdots$.

Is there an explicit representation of $\eta_\Gamma$ in terms of $\alpha$, $\beta$, and the various maps mentioned earlier?

  • $\begingroup$ Have you understood how to do this when $N=M$ and $\Gamma = \Delta$ is the graph of the identity? That's an important example to understand. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Nov 6 '17 at 19:05
  • $\begingroup$ @TedShifrin: No, I don't think I understand that example. Do you have a reference? $\endgroup$ – Steve D Nov 6 '17 at 19:22
  • $\begingroup$ Bott/Tu work it out carefully somewhere! Try p. 126-127. $\endgroup$ – Ted Shifrin Nov 6 '17 at 19:25
  • $\begingroup$ @TedShifrin: Ok, I'll find it! Are there difficulties in going from this "base" case to the general one? Is it even possible to say generally what $\eta_\Gamma$ looks like? I realize I'm asking this before I even look at your reference, so feel free to not answer right away. :) $\endgroup$ – Steve D Nov 6 '17 at 20:02
  • $\begingroup$ @TedShifrin: Thanks again for the pointer. I think I've worked out the general (somewhat ugly) case; I'd be grateful if you'd take a look and check for mistakes. $\endgroup$ – Steve D Nov 7 '17 at 0:54

After @TedShifrin gave me the hint in the comments, I followed the exposition in Bott-Tu, and came up with the following:

$$ \eta_\Gamma=\sum_{\deg(\alpha_i)+\deg(\beta_j)=n} c_{ij}\pi_1^\ast\alpha_i\wedge\pi_2^\ast\beta_j$$

where $\alpha_i$ are a basis for $H^\ast(M)$ and $\beta_j$ are a basis for $H^\ast(N)$. If $\overline{\alpha}_i$ denotes a Poincare-dual basis to $\alpha_i$, and $\overline{\beta}_j$ denotes a Poincare-dual basis to $\beta_j$, then we can write the $c_{ij}$ as

$$ c_{ij} = (-1)^{\deg(\overline{\beta}_j)}\int_M\overline{\alpha}_i\wedge f^\ast\overline{\beta}_j$$

This seems to agree with the case that $\Gamma=\Delta$ is the diagonal, and $f$ is the identity map from $M$ to $N=M$.

I'll also mention this agrees with the case I'm more familiar with, where $N=S^2$. Then if $\beta\in H^2(S^2)$ is the volume form, we should have $$ \eta_\Gamma=\pi_1^\ast f^\ast\beta + \pi_2^\ast\beta $$ and this agrees with the formula above.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.