# Quotient group $SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2,\mathbb{R})$

I am confused by expressions like $\mathbb{R}/\mathbb{Z}$, especially if I see something of the sort $SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2,\mathbb{R})$. I don't know what to make of it. I understand what a quotient of a group for an equivalence looks like, but I can't get my head around expressions like above.

Is a quotient like this always a group and what do elements in the set $SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2,\mathbb{R})$ look like?

• The elements of $G/H$ are subsets of the form $g H = \{ gh, h \in H\}$ so that $G = \bigcup_{gH \in G/H} gH$. And $G/H$ is a group iff $\forall g \in G, gH= Hg$ ie. $H$ is normal. In this case you can define the group law on $G/H$ : $(g_1 H)(g_2H) = g_1 (Hg_2)H=g_1g_2 HH=(g_1g_2)H$. $\mathbb{R}$ is abelian thus $\mathbb{Z}$ is normal. $SO(2,\mathbb{R})$ is not normal because $g \in SO(2,\mathbb{R})$ ie. $gg^\top = 1$ doesn't mean $(\gamma g \gamma^{-1})(\gamma g \gamma^{-1})^\top = 1$. – reuns Nov 5 '17 at 20:13

They are a lot of questions in one post. I will do my best to answer them.

First, let me recall the notion of group action:

Definition $1$. Let $X$ be a set and let $G$ be a group, a left action of $G$ on $X$ is a map $\cdot\colon G\times X\rightarrow X$ which satisfies the two following axioms:

• $\forall x\in X,e\cdot x=x.$

• $\forall(g,g')\in G\times G,\forall x\in X,g\cdot(g'\cdot x)=gg'\cdot x.$

This definition is equivalent to the following:

Definition $2$. Let $X$ be a set and let $G$ be a group, a left action is group morphism from $G$ to $\mathfrak{S}(X)$.

If $\cdot\colon G\times X\rightarrow X$ is a group action in the sense of definition $1$, then $g\mapsto \{x\mapsto g\cdot x\}$ is a group action in the sense of definition $2$. Conversely, if $\varphi\colon G\rightarrow\mathfrak{S}(X)$ is a group homorphism, then $g\cdot x=\varphi(g)(x)$ is a group action in the sense of definition $1$.

Example 1. If $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, then $H$ acts on $G$ by left translation i.e. $(h,g)\mapsto hg$ is a group action.

Now, let us define the notion of quotient set in this general setup:

Definition $3$. Let $G$ be a group acting on a set $X$, then $G/X$ is the set of all orbits, namely: $$G/X:=\{G\cdot x;x\in X\}$$ where $G\cdot x:=\{g\cdot x;g\in G\}$ is the orbit of $x$.

The set $G/X$ is a collection of subsets of $X$. In all generality, this is not a group, for example, $X$ may not be a group itself.

Example $2$. If $H$ is a subgroup of $G$, then $G/H:=\{gH;g\in G\}$.

Let us investigate the structure of $G/H$ when $G$ is a group and $H$ is a subgroup acting by left translation.

Proposition $1$. Assume that $H$ is normal in $G$ i.e. for all $g\in G$, $gHg^{-1}=H$, then $G/H$ is endowed with a unique group structure such that the canonical projection $\pi\colon G\twoheadrightarrow G/H$ is a group morphism.

Proof. Let define the operation on $G/H$ to be $gH\cdot g'H=gg'H$ or equivalently : $\pi(g)\pi(g')=\pi(gg')$. The key point is that this definition does not depend on the choice of $g$ and $g'$, namely: $$gH=xH,g'H=x'H\Rightarrow gg'H=xx'H.$$ Indeed, there exists $h,h'\in H$ such that $x=gh$ and $x'=g'h'$, therefore, one has: $$xx'H=ghg'\underbrace{h'}_{\in H}H=ghg'H=gg'\underbrace{g'^{-1}hg'}_{\in H}H=gg'H.$$ Now that the operation on $G/H$ is well-defined, I let you check the remaining properties (associativity, existence of identity element, existence of inverse). Whence the result. $\Box$

Conversely, if $G/H$ is a group such that $\pi$ is a group morphism, then $H$ is normal as the kernel of $\pi$.

What I like to emphasize is that when working when quotient sets it is crucial to specify the group action!

Maybe I'll close this answer mentioning a useful result:

Theorem. Let $G$ be a group acting on $X$, then for all $x\in X$, there is a bijective correspondence: $$G/G_x\cong G\cdot x$$ where $G_x:=\{g\in G\textrm{ s.t. }g\cdot x=x\}$.

Proof. Consider $gG_x\mapsto g\cdot x$, in particular, check the well-definedness of this map. $\Box$

Remark 1. The set $G_x$ is a subgroup of $G$, but it may not be normal.

Example 3. $\mathbb{S}^n\cong SO(n+1)/SO(n)$ as sets, but even as smooth manifolds with a much-refined theorem.

Here, the action of $SO(n+1)$ on $\mathbb{S}^n$ is given by $(M,x)\mapsto Mx$ which is transitive, which means that each orbit under $SO(n+1)$ is the whole $\mathbb{S}^n$. If $x=(1,0,\ldots,0)$, then the stabilizer is given by: $$SO(n+1)_x=\left\{\begin{pmatrix}1 & 0\\0& A\end{pmatrix};A\in SO(n)\right\}\underset{\textrm{abusive}}{=}SO(n).$$ Indeed, the first column must be $x$ and by orthogonality the first entry of each other column must be $0$. Whence the result by the theorem.

Coming back to your main question (and guessing what the action you are working with is):

Let $\mathbb{H}$ be the upper-half plane of $\mathbb{C}$, namely the set of points in $\mathbb{C}$ having a strictly positive imaginary part. Let $SL(2,\mathbb{R})$ acts on $\mathbb{H}$ by homography: $$\begin{pmatrix}a&b\\c&d\end{pmatrix}\cdot z=\frac{az+b}{cz+d}.$$ Then this action is transitive and the stabilizer of $i$ is given by: $$SL(2,\mathbb{R})_i=\left\{\begin{pmatrix}a & b\\-b&a\end{pmatrix};a,b\in\mathbb{R}\right\}=SO(2).$$ Whence using the theorem, $SL(2,\mathbb{R})/SO(2)\cong\mathbb{H}$ as sets and again even as smooth manifolds.

• First of all, thank you for your answer. Things are beginning to get clearer for me. I have some questions. In Definition 2, what is the codomain? (I don't know what the symbol stands for). The second question is, since $SO(2,\mathbb{R})$ is not normal, I have to think of it as you mention it a collection of subsets of $SO(2,\mathbb{R})$, or the set of orbits under the left multiplication of the group $SL$, right? – laguna Nov 5 '17 at 20:36
• I believe that the notation I used in definition 2 is not widespread, $\mathfrak{S}(X)$ is the group of bijections from $X$ to $X$, in other words, the permutation group of $X$. Regarding your other question, yes that's exactly it. However, you should specify how $SL$ acts on $SO$ to get a better description of the quotient. – C. Falcon Nov 5 '17 at 20:39
• Is there a possible connection with Iwasawa decomposition ? – Jean Marie Nov 5 '17 at 20:57
• (+1) This is just beautiful! For myself I have had a hard time aswell wrapping my head around the concept of a quotient group. As I learned quite lately about the notion group actions the way of thinking about quotient groups you described above was not available for me yet; but now. This is revealing! Thank you for this :) – mrtaurho Apr 23 at 20:45

This quotient group consists of $2\times 2$ matrices with determinant 1 (because both $SL_2(\mathbb{R})$ and $SO_2(\mathbb{R})$ consist of matrices with determinant 1).

The quotient group is partitioned into equivalence classes of matrices that are not orthogonal, where elements of $SO_2(\mathbb{R})$ are treated as 0, and other elements are conceived of as their remainders mod an element of $SO_2(\mathbb{R})$.

A quotient of two groups $G/H$ is always a group as long as $H$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.

• But $SO(2)$ is not a normal subgroup in $SL(2)$. – Dietrich Burde Nov 5 '17 at 20:35