I'm trying to expand this expression (for $1 \leq j \leq n+1$)

$$ \prod_{i=1 ; i\neq j}^{n+1} (x-i) $$

in terms of Stirling numbers. The falling factorial $(x)_{n}$ is defined as

$$ (x)_{n}=\prod_{i=0}^{n-1} (x-i)=\sum_{i=0}^{n}(-1)^{n-i} \begin{bmatrix} n\\ i \end{bmatrix}x^i =\sum_{i=0}^{n}s(n,i)x^i $$ where $s(n,i)$ is the Stirling number of the first kind. This gives me the expression.. $$ \prod_{i=1 ; i\neq j}^{n+1} (x-i)=\frac{1}{x-j}\sum_{i=1}^{n+2}s(n+2,i)x^{i-1} $$ Formula fixed.


Formula is fixed, this solution works.


Lets get the definition of the Stirling numbers (of the first kind) in terms of falling factorials right \begin{eqnarray*} (x)_{n}=\prod_{i=0}^{\color{red}{n-1}} (x-i)=\sum_{i=0}^{n}(-1)^{n-i} \begin{bmatrix} n\\ i \end{bmatrix}x^{\color{red}{i}} =\sum_{\color{red}{i=1}}^{n}(-1)^{n-i} \begin{bmatrix} n\\ i \end{bmatrix}x^{i}. \end{eqnarray*} The zeroth term is zero $\begin{bmatrix} n\\ 0 \end{bmatrix}=0$ and can be included or ommited (for convenience.) Have a quick look at the numbers in Wiki https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stirling_numbers_of_the_first_kind#Table_of_values_for_small_n_and_k

In your formula there is no need for $i \neq j$ and it should look like this \begin{eqnarray*} \prod_{i=1}^{n} (x-i)=\sum_{i=1}^{n+1}(-1)^{n+1-i} \begin{bmatrix} n+1 \\ i \end{bmatrix}x^{i-1}. \end{eqnarray*}

Edit : The Stirling numbers satisfy the following recurrence relation \begin{eqnarray*} \begin{bmatrix} m+1 \\ k \end{bmatrix} = m\begin{bmatrix} m \\ k \end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix} m \\ k-1 \end{bmatrix}. \\ \end{eqnarray*} If you wish to omit one of the factors, you will need to omit the associated iteration and define a new sequence of numbers \begin{eqnarray*} \begin{bmatrix} m+1 \\ k \end{bmatrix} = m\begin{bmatrix} m \\ k \end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix} m \\ k-1 \end{bmatrix} \! m=1,\cdots,j-1 \\ \begin{bmatrix} m+1 \\ k \end{bmatrix} = (m+1)\begin{bmatrix} m \\ k \end{bmatrix} + \begin{bmatrix} m \\ k-1 \end{bmatrix} \! m=j,\cdots,n. \\ \end{eqnarray*}

  • $\begingroup$ Oh ok, the article i was referencing redefined the index. Thanks, this makes sense. $\endgroup$ – Baklava Gain Oct 30 '17 at 0:28
  • $\begingroup$ I am trying to get the expression for $i \neq j$ though, i have updated the question with your formulas.. $\endgroup$ – Baklava Gain Oct 30 '17 at 1:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.