In order to simplify the state space model when $x_2 = x_3$ you can just substitute in $x_2 = x_3 = z$ which gives
$$
\begin{bmatrix}
\dot{x}_1 \\ \dot{z} \\ \dot{z}
\end{bmatrix} =
\begin{bmatrix}
A_{11} & A_{12} & A_{13} \\
A_{21} & A_{22} & A_{23} \\
A_{31} & A_{32} & A_{33}
\end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix}
x_1 \\ z \\ z
\end{bmatrix} +
\begin{bmatrix}
B_1 \\ B_2 \\ B_3
\end{bmatrix} u. \tag{1}
$$
Equating both expressions for $\dot{z}$ gives
$$
(A_{21} - A_{31})\,x_1 + (A_{22} + A_{23} - A_{32} - A_{33})\,z + (B_2 - B_3)\,u = 0. \tag{2}
$$
Solving this for $z$ gives
$$
z = (A_{22} + A_{23} - A_{32} - A_{33})^{-1} \left((A_{31} - A_{21})\,x_1 + (B_3 - B_2)\,u\right) \tag{3}
$$
and therefore the dynamics of $x_1$ can also be written as
$$
\dot{x}_1 = \left(A_{11} + (A_{12} + A_{13})\,(A_{22} + A_{23} - A_{32} - A_{33})^{-1} (A_{31} - A_{21})\right)\,x_1 + \left(B_1 + (A_{12} + A_{13})\,(A_{22} + A_{23} - A_{32} - A_{33})^{-1} (B_3 - B_2)\right)\,u. \tag{4}
$$
However equating both expressions for $\dot{z}$ and solving for $z$ does not actually ensure that the two expressions for it are actually equal to the time derivative of $z$. In order to reduce the size of the following expressions I will define the following matrices
$$
A_z = (A_{22} + A_{23} - A_{32} - A_{33})^{-1} (A_{31} - A_{21}) \tag{5}
$$
$$
B_z = (A_{22} + A_{23} - A_{32} - A_{33})^{-1} (B_3 - B_2) \tag{6}
$$
such that $z = A_z\,x_1 + B_z\,u$. Taking the time derivative of this gives
$$
\dot{z} = A_z\,\dot{x}_1 + B_z\,\dot{u}. \tag{7}
$$
Substituting $(4)$ into $(7)$ gives
$$
\dot{z} = A_z\,\left(A_{11} + (A_{12} + A_{13})\,A_z\right)\,x_1 + A_z\,\left(B_1 + (A_{12} + A_{13})\,B_z\right)\,u + B_z\,\dot{u} \tag{8}
$$
which should be equal to one of the expressions for $\dot{z}$ from $(1)$. But since both are equivalent I will just use the first, which gives
$$
\dot{z} = \left(A_{21} + (A_{22} + A_{23})\,A_z\right)\,x_1 + \left(B_2 + (A_{22} + A_{23})\,B_z\right)\,u. \tag{9}
$$
I am not sure what your end goal would be but by equating the right hand sides of $(8)$ and $(9)$ you could either solve for $x_1$, $u$ or $\dot{u}$. But since the context of the question is model reduction I would assume you would want to solve for $x_1$. Doing so gives
$$
x_1 = \left(A_{21} + M\,A_z - A_z\,A_{11}\right)^{-1} \left(\left(A_z\,B_1 - M\,B_z - B_2\right)\,u + B_z\,\dot{u}\right) \tag{10}
$$
with
$$
M = A_{22} + A_{23} - A_z\,(A_{12} + A_{13}). \tag{11}
$$
However equation $(10)$ might have multiple solutions if the dimension of $x_1$ is larger than that that of $z$. But if their dimensions are of equal size and the matrix inverse in $(10)$ exists, then plugging all this into the definition of $y$ gives that $y$ is a direct linear function of $u$ and $\dot{u}$, which would make it a non-causal system (so a system with no proper transfer function).