2
$\begingroup$

first post on here!

I have been learning about complex numbers, and how they do not satisfy the trichotomy like real numbers do.

For example, there is no way to say $i<3$, $i>3$, or $i=3$.

But consider this: If $x<y$, then $\sqrt x < \sqrt y$. So let $x=-1$ and $y=9$. Then $-1<9$, so $\sqrt {-1} < \sqrt 9$. In other words, $i<3$.

Can someone explain the flaw in this reasoning?

I imagine that it has something to do with $\sqrt {-1}$ not being real, and so the x,y statement doesn't apply, but I can't think of a way to say why it doesn't apply. It seems like it should, since -1 is real, even if its square root is not.

Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ So would you say that $-i$ is also $<3$? $\endgroup$ – lulu Oct 26 '17 at 19:49
  • $\begingroup$ See here: math.stackexchange.com/questions/1811686/… $\endgroup$ – carmichael561 Oct 26 '17 at 19:51
  • $\begingroup$ Well it depends, do you want only to oder them a set ? Choose any bijection between reals and complexes and you automatically have a total order, however if you hope that your ordering is compatible with arithmetical operations than the answer is you can't (see Peter answer) $\endgroup$ – Renato Faraone Oct 26 '17 at 19:56
  • $\begingroup$ Lulu, I would say that $$-i = i^3 = (\sqrt {-1})^3 = \sqrt {{-1}^3} = \sqrt {-1} < \sqrt {9} = 3$$ $\endgroup$ – Sam Oct 26 '17 at 20:05
  • $\begingroup$ I think you already answered your question when you said the statement $x<y \Rightarrow \sqrt{x} < \sqrt{y}$ is a statement about the real numbers not the complex numbers. By the way i think there probably are useful orderings of the complex numbers (for example set inclusion on the complex numbers would give you a partial ordering --but not sure how useful this is). $\endgroup$ – vkan Oct 28 '17 at 0:37
4
$\begingroup$

Suppose, $i>0$ , then since multiplying with a positive number does not change the sign, we have $i^2>0$, but this is false because of $i^2=-1$

Suppose, $i<0$, then since multiplying with a negative number changes the sign, we have $i^2>0$, again a contradiction.

So, neither $i>0$ nor $i<0$ is consistent with the rules of ordered numbers.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Perhaps the OP should be reminded about what an ordered field is? $\endgroup$ – Pedro Tamaroff Oct 26 '17 at 20:04
  • $\begingroup$ Peter, thanks, this makes sense. Because also if you suppose $i=0$, then $i^2 = -1$, but also $i^2 = 0^2 = 0$, so $-1=0$, which is false. $\endgroup$ – Sam Oct 26 '17 at 20:08
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Sam True, but $i=0$ is already a contradiction. $\endgroup$ – Peter Oct 26 '17 at 20:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.